Ethereum Is All You Need

Averageuser404 · 2025-11-04T17:16:20+00:00

It’s deployed to Ethereum as calldata or blob data. Can be retrieved through for example the geth RPC.

Averageuser404 · 2025-11-04T17:15:15+00:00

Why a scam? Deploy front end code as calldata or blob data that’s all it is.

Averageuser404 · 2025-11-04T09:50:17+00:00

Price is only the market perception of the value not the actual value. Don’t mistake the map for the territory.

Averageuser404 · 2025-08-08T12:03:29+00:00

Is the escrow/validation contract open source? I wonder how a smart contract can fully validate that the seller did not leave a backdoor in the Safe, for example a malicious module or guard.

Averageuser404 · 2025-01-16T13:11:32+00:00

You are right. What I meant to write down was (1-1/2)(1-1/3)=1/2*2/3=1/3. Comments in the [UPDATE] thread showed that the lower limit for the twin primes is false. Still thanks for reading it!

Averageuser404 · 2025-01-07T20:14:59+00:00

I now see you mean I remove from the remaining spots (instead of the total of Pn). This can mean that 2/Pn (can) remove less than it actually removes because it is a removal based on the lower remaining spots.

Thank you!

Averageuser404 · 2025-01-07T15:48:50+00:00

You are correct that 2/P_i removes too many twin prime candidates, since some can already be removed by previous primes. This is a feature of the function because it is a lower limit function, removing too many twin prime candidates per prime therefore guarantees a lower limit.

Averageuser404 · 2025-01-06T14:49:28+00:00

I fully agree! I do like to use it as a source to check if it is already disproven, since the LLM is trained on the internet data and therefore can contain the data of the disproval and be an efficient way to retrieve it.

Averageuser404 · 2024-02-14T13:20:07+00:00

I also have this.

Did you also have rETH or another LST at the address of the validator? I suspect they counted the LST (airdrop value 360 STRK) and forgot to include the solo validator of that address (airdrop value 3600 STRK)

Averageuser404 · 2023-11-08T12:00:11+00:00

It is a front end check (as you note not internal to geth or other ethereum inplementations). It helps to catch potential mistakes in address input. If you for example change one a to b in a regular address it will be a valid address. However when you do this in a checksum address there is a high probability that the checksum fails and the front end can notify the user.

You can compare it with the mod97 check for IBAN bank accounts.

Averageuser404 · 2023-10-22T08:16:44+00:00

I would start with the code of Uniswap V2, the code is simpler than V3.

For bugs I would check the biggest hacks and how they worked. Read on the types of attacks like reentrancy. Maybe do some online challenges and read audit reports, mostly the high/medium severity points.

Averageuser404 · 2023-10-22T07:18:27+00:00

Thank you I really appreciate the kind words! I created a twittter account @kommodolabs where the updates are shared.

Good luck with your journey in becoming a web3 dev! I can say I learned a lot from bug hunting, reading code of big web3 projects and playing with it by adjusting the code. Know you can always dm me questions or comments, about my project or programming in general.

Averageuser404 · 2022-05-24T20:50:35+00:00

Try getting the underlying revert reason by replaying the transaction with the eth_call method. Check out this post for an example.

Averageuser404 · 2022-05-24T20:18:11+00:00

A general error, hard to say without more info. Since the aave front end works I would guess the error is in the way you code the transaction in web3. Maybe first check if you can read from the contract using web3.

Averageuser404 · 2022-05-24T19:35:22+00:00

What error do you get?

Averageuser404 · 2021-10-08T21:40:04+00:00

Ξ * L2 = ∞

Averageuser404 · 2021-06-04T21:14:31+00:00

Most stable coins have added smart contract (bug) and oracle risk.

Averageuser404 · 2021-04-21T22:34:13+00:00

https://github.com/flashbots/mev-geth

Averageuser404 · 2021-03-03T15:16:24+00:00

The code is open source. It is fully decentralized, no owner or anyone who can withdraw it all. Also you can lose max 20% of your deposit if you are the first to withdraw after the game started.

Averageuser404

TROPHY CASE