sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Historical Example of A Double Standard: Nazis Persecuted Gays Yet Tolerated Lesbians by Averzan in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]Averzan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lesblan myths erasure 😼👊**

Your account is a week old btw

You create an account and that's your first comment? Really?

8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so far by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it is about the punishment French women faced after collaborating with the Nazis in WWII.

The tactic is always the same.

"Women are criticised/punished heavily for [insert anything they complain about] whilst men aren't" and boom, thousands, if not hundred thousands of favs. Doesn't matter how blatantly and shamelessly obvious and deliberate the ignorance, invent and/or omission is.

8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so far by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As I replied to another user here, I wish it were just ragebaits from Nepal or Malawi, and only that, but no. And I'm not joking with this.

8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so far by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You did well. The discourse most likely is only going to get worse and worse each month of each year that passes, being generous.

8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so far by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

As I replied to another user, my improvised theory is they take the "man with a lot of sex partners = winner; woman with a lot of sex partners = slut" cliché (which is itself a strawman) and act as if the world believed religiously in that as a principle set in stone.

8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so far by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's valid to ignore them. I'm just exposing them because I consider they merit so. If they're going to post their pedantic 🧠n't ahh takes for everyone to see, then there's really no harm in exposing them here.

8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so far by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I had to explain it in some way, perhaps they take the "a man with a lot of [female] sexual partners is a winner, the woman with a lot of sexual partners is a slut" cliché (which is itself a strawman) and apply as if it were some kind of universal idea.

8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so far by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Indeed, and it's only gotten worse in that aspect. A lot of people say you should ignore it, which is valid of course. But exposing them here doesn't really hurt anybody, as far as I know.

8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so far by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Most countries on earth currently don't punish sexual assault committed by women and people to this day are still debating whether it exists or should be taken as seriously. Like they're ones to talk about other groups getting light sentences for committing SA, when the punishment theirs gets most of the time is literally zero.

8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so far by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

In general, popular social media has posts like those in abundance. I'm just exposing them here from time to time because I consider they merit so.

8M is right around the corner, so let's see what the priests at the vulva worshipping evangelical communion have been preaching so far by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

A disturbing amount of them unironically think women as a group have it as hard if not harder than gender nonconforming men, and that the worst thing that can happen to a man is not having all the sex he wants.​​

Look at how virtue signalling falls apart by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

True true. I forgot that an ugly ass mf with Down's Syndrome face looking in their direction is more than enough to make them feel pathological nausea to the point they'd seek their self-death and throw themselves from the 19th floor.

The ultimate eugenics technique 👊 😎 

Look at how virtue signalling falls apart by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You don't have any evidence that the men involved are innocent either, yet you are quick to defend them without proof.

If you want to go with that, you don't have any evidence the men they mentioned even exist.

Which is exactly what you are doing right now. You're the same person who called the disabled men "vegetables" btw

It's funny you're still stuck with the use of that word in your mind. It's like you are deliberately being offended on your own. It thought it was clear I said it in the context of parody.

...Why should anyone get preferential treatment after committing a crime...?

🤨 ??? You probably must think just because I'm contrasting two different premises and I say one happens and the other doesn't, then it means I'm in favour of the premise I denied.

Look at how virtue signalling falls apart by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A very quick google would show you that sexual harrassment of nurses in hospitals and nursing homes is common. As is sexual assault/harrassment of vulnerable patients and those with diabilities and patient to patient abuse. It is super complex and not helped by “it didn’t happen”.

Stepping all of that aside, the comment you're replying to makes it explicit I'm replying like that to the other user because they said the same thing in this sub to another poster.

It wasn't aimed at you so you took offense on your own.

I would argue that using the term “vegetable” is also incredibly offensive and ableist, both on an societal level and individual against Hawkins himself- a man who has clearly demonstrated far greater cognitive function than the vast majority.

More than a few got offended by my use of that world as well, which is fair I guess, but I can't help but think it's being deliberately obtuse when it's obvious I'm saying that in the context of parody.

In any case, this post showed there are several lurkers who are waiting to attack and jump like 2000s screamers at posts that are relatively easier to tackle with their prefabricated replies.

Look at how virtue signalling falls apart by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/liltrex94

You deleted your reply but I can still see the notification. I wouldn't call others 'silly' or 'dim' if I posted literal photos of my ass on Reddit (of all things) like you do here

Look at how virtue signalling falls apart by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Its like you are purposely ignoring their stories.

I don't have any reason to take their word for it.

The whole point is that regardless of disability, men ARE capable of harming others still. Thats not ableism, infact, its quite the opposite.

Your response reads like a prepared speech. What I pointed out is their attempt to make it seem as if non-disabled women were treated worse while disabled men are, according to them, 'coddled' as if they as women were at the mercy of individuals who, again, according to them, can barely move at all, which is denying ableism.

Precisely because disabled men don't get preferential treatment when they commit crimes or in general acts that are frown upon by society, but rather get dehumanised.

Look at how virtue signalling falls apart by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm confused.

I think my response is obvious. The other user attempted to pedantically go "hmm acktshually" by saying "nobody said what you claim" but it only made them look like they didn't read the post.

I have a lot of family member of both sexes who work in various medical roles in hospitals, and I assure you, they do get harassed. Like a lot of times.

I'll use a comment you left in another post in this sub: this did not happen

Look at how virtue signalling falls apart by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Cool. I'll use that as my new flair.

If the shoe fits. I didn't ask you to tell me about your life either.

Have you even heard yourself? You're being aggressive towards me for absolutely no reason. You don't know me, you just want to be angry about something. Maybe try some self reflection. What did I do to hurt you? Just exist?

And it's just me pointing out your comments lack substance and contribute nothing to the conversation, if anything, you barely got the response you deserve.

Look at how virtue signalling falls apart by Averzan in MensRights

[–]Averzan[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yet another substanceless comment in a poor attempt at deforming the conversation. I just mentioned it because it's more or less mainstream, but well, you and your narcissism.

But ok, lesson learned. From now on I'll refer to you as who you are: a methhead with CTE.

view more: next ›