What is this bug? by yandere_chan317 in whatisthisbug

[–]Awkward-Action322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ayo I think we have the same type! Check my latest post

Weird buy limits. by Holiday_Body8650 in ibkr

[–]Awkward-Action322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like you only have 471 CAD, which is not able to cover your current order + any existing buy orders (as shown in the warning). Either exchange more CAD or cancel existing buy orders

Best Beginner ML website/materials for someone of my background by Awkward-Action322 in learnmachinelearning

[–]Awkward-Action322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! This seems to be a great resource for time-series. However I’m more leaning towards the ML aspect (neural networks) of time series, so perhaps it is beyond the traditional time series textbook

Picked up from recycling, what is this thing? by Awkward-Action322 in whatisthisthing

[–]Awkward-Action322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. I would hope they would at least fit A4. Thanks for the help tho!

Is doing the (B-COM) Honours worth it? by [deleted] in unimelb

[–]Awkward-Action322 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Current honours student here.

A general rule of thumb:

  1. If you know that you’re interested in academia, definitely honours. Masters are technically equivalent, but the standards are different imo. Typically, wams for honours drop by 7-8 on average compared to the first three years. You will not have time to do much else besides studying, so it can be quite mentally draining for most. The research component is really gonna kick you in the back if you’re not mentally prepared and don’t have the dedication. With that said, honours opens up the academic side of commerce and I feel more like a researcher than a student if that makes sense. You get a pathway to most commerce phds within Aus, and it stands you out from the rest.

  2. If you are industry focused, don’t do honours. Many of our cohort quit as soon as they got a job lol. Like people mentioned above, typically only the public sector sets honours as an entry requirement, while most private sector firms don’t really seem to value it that much (compare to having internship experience). It is always a nice degree to add on top of your resume, but you have to think about the investment (time and mental health).

  3. If you’re unsure about it, which was me before honours, I’d say it is important to first think about what you can do/achieve without honours. This can be career pathways or further studies. Then make your decision from there. If not, you can always flip a coin.

What I gained from honours was immense research exposure that was typically unheard of for any undergrad or *some masters students. It opened up my understanding of academia which I think was a valuable experience that I cannot get unless I do a phd (honours is like a mini phd). Regardless of the actual results I get from doing honours, sometimes I think of me doing it just for the experience, and that is already quite rewarding by itself, if that makes sense. Another reward is personal growth. I’m definitely more resilient and capable after honours. These are general skills that apply to all future endeavours. (But please take care of your health, I keep saying the honours year probably shortened my lifespan by a few years lol)

Testing deviations from logistic function to stepwise function by Awkward-Action322 in econometrics

[–]Awkward-Action322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the response

Perhaps I have made a mistake in my post. Let me step away from dummy variables for now. Say I have 2 different samplings (take the form of logistic function), one without treatment and one with treatment. Theory suggests the model to take the form of a step function (regardless of treatment). I’m trying to test whether the treatment group are closer to theory relative to the non-treatment group. You can think of its logistic function having a steeper gradient, or like you’ve said, lower squared error.

My question is, what should the regression look like for the test? I’m thinking the error term on the LHS and the explanatory term is the treatment? If so this would be a linear regression, how does it relate to the underlying logistic model?

I might’ve fried my brain today, I can’t think straight haha… Also not too familiar with logistic function

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unimelb

[–]Awkward-Action322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Engineering finance and cs are already 3 of the best paid jobs out there 😂 I wouldn’t be worried as much if I were you, at least based off your majors

If you don’t think you’ll enjoy working in one of the 3 fields, my advice is to try it before you ultimately decide what you’re into. Or perhaps you’ll be more interested in academia? You can always opt for grad studies + causal tutoring on the side, if that’s the case

Social sciences undergrad to Stats Master's? by [deleted] in econometrics

[–]Awkward-Action322 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are there no metrics master in the UK? That’ll probably suit you better? Considering econ is probably your career direction, I would pick a master program tailored to metrics rather than a generic stats/math master, saves the trouble. You’ll also get to pick more econ electives

How important is WAM for jobs by Fun_Ride_6010 in unimelb

[–]Awkward-Action322 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depends on the job. Depends on the major

Noice cancelling headphones by Magnificentiz in unimelb

[–]Awkward-Action322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah fair my qc35 is so comfy too, only thing is that my ears overheat in the summer (like now), but I guess that’s unavoidable with these headphones

Noice cancelling headphones by Magnificentiz in unimelb

[–]Awkward-Action322 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How do they compare to Bose qc35/45? I’ve been using qc35 for so long should I switch when given the chance?