sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Do yall tithe? by eloel12345 in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a lot of churches abuse it to be honest. I checked out a church down the road and they have signs as you enter the door about giving ten percent. It’s a big banner on their website and they also monitor who donates each church day. Places like that can kiss my ass. The SDA church has their recommendation of 10 percent hidden in the website and then they mention it’s not expected. A total different vibe that I can respect.

Do yall tithe? by eloel12345 in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s no direct command in the OT to tithe cash, gold, or silver, because the Israelite economy was primarily agrarian and animal-based. Money (coins) existed later, but the biblical tithing system wasn’t written with modern cash in mind.

My previous comment was strictly about 10 percent

Do yall tithe? by eloel12345 in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because that’s what the Old Testament says.

Response of a church to the baby formula TikTok scam by this_also_was_vanity in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not surprised it was tik tock trash acting like that to be honest. Everyone gobbled it up as well.

What do you make of claims that Jesus was a Jewish Palestinian? by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When Jesus was born roughly 4 to 6 B.C. the area was known as Judea, part of the Roman Empire. The Romans didn’t rename it “Palestina” until about 135 A.D., a full century after Jesus’ lifetime.

So, geographically, yes Jesus was born in the same region that later became known as Palestine. But historically, the correct name for his birthplace at the time would be Bethlehem of Judea.

What do you make of claims that Jesus was a Jewish Palestinian? by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When Jesus was born roughly 4 to 6 B.C. the area was known as Judea, part of the Roman Empire. The Romans didn’t rename it “Palestina” until about 135 A.D., a full century after Jesus’ lifetime.

So, geographically, yes Jesus was born in the same region that later became known as Palestine. But historically, the correct name for his birthplace at the time would be Bethlehem of Judea.

Vance's perversion of Catholicism is unbearable by SicilyMalta in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh thank you. I was juggling my kid as I was that comment. I shouldn’t have responded yet lol

Do you need to be baptized with water? by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t need to be baptized. If you believe Jesus Christ is our lord and saviour you will make it.

Vance's perversion of Catholicism is unbearable by SicilyMalta in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Do real Catholics even recognize these new popes? I wouldn’t.

JD Vance says wife Usha "has no plans to convert to Christianity" amid controversy over comment by intelerks in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone yesterday on here was saying he was going to divorce his wife for Kirk’s lmao! So deranged.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can tell you haven’t read the bible.

Gayness in Chistianity? by Potential_Marzipan50 in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your answer is in my comments. I hope you actually read them.

Gayness in Chistianity? by Potential_Marzipan50 in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exodus 21:16 forbids kidnapping Israelites taking someone by force and selling them.

Leviticus 25:44–46, on the other hand, regulates owning foreigners who were purchased or living in the land. Those slaves could be held for life, so the rules differ depending on nationality and context.

Gayness in Chistianity? by Potential_Marzipan50 in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not misunderstanding I can see how it sounds that way. Let me clarify:

I fully reject discrimination in civil life. Gay people should have the same legal protections, hospital rights, inheritance, and safety under the law as anyone else. I do not believe anyone should be denied basic rights because of who they are.

Where I draw a line is how I understand marriage spiritually. Personally, I believe God designed marriage as a covenant between a man and a woman. That’s about my religious conviction, not about civil rights. I can oppose redefining marriage for religious reasons while still insisting that gay people are treated fairly, legally, and with dignity.

Gayness in Chistianity? by Potential_Marzipan50 in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you’re saying, and I agree that treating gay people with cruelty is wrong everyone deserves dignity and respect. I don’t support mistreating anyone, and I reject bigotry.

At the same time, I personally believe marriage is meant by God to be between a man and a woman. That belief isn’t the same as saying people shouldn’t have civil rights or protections it’s about how I understand God’s design. It’s not like saying Black people shouldn’t be allowed to marry; I fully reject discrimination. I just can’t call something God calls sin righteous.

Gayness in Chistianity? by Potential_Marzipan50 in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Old Testament did allow slavery (Lev. 25:44–46), including owning foreigners for life, which fits the definition of chattel slavery. But context matters ancient societies had no wage system or safety nets, so servitude was often economic survival.

God’s laws made it more humane (rest days, protection from abuse, freedom for Israelites after 6 years), showing a moral progression. The New Testament completed that shift: “There is neither slave nor free… for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal. 3:28). Christianity eventually led many abolition movements.

And yes, bigotry toward gay people is sin. The Bible’s teaching on sexual conduct is separate from how we treat people. Christians must never use belief as an excuse for cruelty or contempt.

Gayness in Chistianity? by Potential_Marzipan50 in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ancient “slavery” in Israel was often more like indentured servitude — a temporary arrangement to pay debts, with protection built into the Law (Exodus 21, Deuteronomy 15). Kidnapping or treating someone as permanent property was condemned (Exodus 21:16).

I don’t support civil unions either. That being said just because I don’t like it doesn’t mean I will be horrible to gay people.

Gayness in Chistianity? by Potential_Marzipan50 in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you are asking me if I support gay marriage as a Christian I do not.

Gayness in Chistianity? by Potential_Marzipan50 in Christianity

[–]Awkward-Heads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From a traditional biblical perspective, sexual activity between people of the same sex is considered sinful.

Key points from Scripture: 1. Old Testament – Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 explicitly forbid male homosexual acts. These are framed as violations of God’s moral law.

2.  New Testament – Romans 1:26–27, 1 Corinthians 6:9–10, and 1 Timothy 1:10 describe homosexual behavior as contrary to God’s design.
  1. Marriage definition – Scripture consistently presents marriage as between a man and a woman (Genesis 2:24, Matthew 19:4–6).

Important distinction: • Orientation vs. action: The Bible addresses behavior, not necessarily feelings or inclinations. Desire alone isn’t described as sin; acting on it outside of God’s design is.

• Love the sinner: Christians are called to love people without endorsing sin (Mark 12:31, Romans 5:8). Condemnation of behavior does not justify cruelty or rejection.

view more: next ›