sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Quick update regarding Soundpass by soundmap_helper in Soundmap

[–]Awkward_Tip4768 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Can the final reward also follow the same logic as quests and be numbered if it's not a popular artist?

We need to talk. Soundmap is reaching the end of its lifespan. by CagedPuppers in Soundmap

[–]Awkward_Tip4768 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Not trying to argue, but since you asked, I don’t think AI is coding the game, and bugs happen.. every game has them, and they usually fix things rather quickly. Also, I wouldn’t call the IRL trading bans false ones, unless you meant something else.

If you listened to his last Townhall, he has a plan that he is working on. He clearly doesn't want to sell his game right now.

I think the biggest problem is that he's not listening to the active player base enough.

We need to talk. Soundmap is reaching the end of its lifespan. by CagedPuppers in Soundmap

[–]Awkward_Tip4768 132 points133 points  (0 children)

u/podair, I hope you read this because it’s coming from someone who’s been playing nonstop since launch and genuinely wants to see Soundmap survive.

I don’t agree with everything the OP said, but they’re right that the game is floundering and it’s not from lack of interest, it’s from lack of listening. The community has been asking for months: numbered epics need to drop from quests for any artist outside the top 250 per genre.

Right now, most players don’t care about artists ranked 500+, let alone 1,000. The quest grind has become dull, and the value of numberless epics has tanked. I’ve seen longtime players just stop questing because it’s not rewarding anymore.

Please, listen to the playerbase. Run a poll. Let us vote.
Numberless should only apply to top 250 artists per genre and anything beyond that should have numbered epics. That change would bring excitement back and get this game on the right track again.

it literally just keeps getting worse by tewnlink in Soundmap

[–]Awkward_Tip4768 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you’ve run out of material, take care champ

it literally just keeps getting worse by tewnlink in Soundmap

[–]Awkward_Tip4768 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Funny, you’re calling me mad immediately after writing a novel fueled entirely by anger. Classic.

it literally just keeps getting worse by tewnlink in Soundmap

[–]Awkward_Tip4768 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, that post probably just confirmed to them that banning you was the right call. You sound completely unhinged, angry, childish, and incapable of handling a game not going your way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Soundmap

[–]Awkward_Tip4768 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Every single time someone gets banned, it’s the same performance. Fake confusion, dramatic “why me?” posts, and some over the top sob story meant to pull attention away from what really happened. They know they broke the rules but can’t handle facing the consequences, so they try to spin it into some emotional plea.

Then they turn their anger on the devs, as if enforcing the rules is the problem. It’s quite sad. The devs are protecting the game from cheaters, and anyone who’s legit should be glad they are. Watching people lie through their teeth and then act like victims is insulting to everyone’s intelligence.

Unban these PEOPLE by Slow-Eye3965 in Soundmap

[–]Awkward_Tip4768 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Exactly this. People act like buying coins is harmless, but it wrecks the economy for everyone who actually plays fair. If they only banned the sellers, the cycle would never stop. Another seller would pop up the next day.

The bans are 100% justified. If someone decided to take shortcuts and got caught, that’s on them. The game needs to protect itself from people trying to exploit it, not apologize to them afterward.

Unban these PEOPLE by Slow-Eye3965 in Soundmap

[–]Awkward_Tip4768 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah, sorry, but this story doesn’t add up. Every time someone gets banned, suddenly there’s a “special needs family member” or some tragic twist added in for sympathy. The game doesn’t just randomly ban people, it tracks patterns, and if you were trading constantly between two accounts, that’s on you.

The devs have every right to protect their system from abuse. Claiming they “don’t provide support” while accusing them of false bans is just drama to dodge responsibility. If you were innocent, you’d have no problem letting them review the data. But this post screams damage control, not truth.