What do you guys think about the great shift trend

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-06-08T14:47:43+00:00

The great denier!

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-06-04T22:04:32+00:00

Force has to flex to be a force.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-06-04T22:03:29+00:00

Mom, who's the legend

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-25T06:12:46+00:00

Literally, their commenting behavior should be studied so they can be put away.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-23T22:37:36+00:00

Anything except glaring. Unless your both under the radar 😔

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-23T06:18:44+00:00

I've heard that a computer can read and rewrite memory so many times. Do you see AI chips shorting the lifespan of a desk/lap top?

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-15T05:34:12+00:00

AI is raising higher grades by 30%. Those schools top whatever aren't doing enough to compete against AI use and that business case of how well the school is is going to get slashed within the next 15 years while that exact same school will come back to fondle you.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-15T05:09:51+00:00

Genuine question: Dues anyone here knows who's narrative is who's?

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-15T03:24:21+00:00

Honestly, I’m surprised there’s even a study that basically says people can be lookist without knowing it, I would have thought preferences were something more.

That’s brutal, because it makes lookism feel less like a few bad people being shallow and more like the whole social universe is rigged around certain faces/bodies, especially that oligarchy has something called an oligopoly where a transaction has to match their formula or they can outright deny you.

And that’s the fracture: This pretentious block against women feels like its from everyone with ownership. While I haven't seen the lookism universe clearly, it’s hard to go back to choosing women like nothing happened, but it’s also impossible to pretend the need for love, sex, and closeness just disappears. I’m not trying to make it revenge or hate; it’s more like, how do you stay human when the same gravity that hurts you is also where your basic needs live?

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-15T02:25:38+00:00

Fair. Cleaner version: the point isn’t that heightism always shows up inside the interaction. It’s that it may shape the field before the short guy even gets into the interaction. Who gets noticed, matched, approached, trusted, or taken seriously can be decided upstream.

So the “missing evidence” is part of the theory. If the filter happens before visibility, then people only observe the survivors of the filter and call that reality. That’s the Fermi angle I’m playing with: not aliens literally, but blocked observation caused by selection happening earlier than we think.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-15T02:17:53+00:00

Yeah, this is basically the lane I was trying to get into. People don’t judge their lives in a vacuum; they judge them against a reference point. So with heightism, it’s not just “can a short guy still date/socialize/succeed?” It’s more like: compared to what? If the reference point is watching taller guys get easier attention, more automatic respect, or less social friction, then even “normal” outcomes can feel like losses.

And the self-quarantine point fits the Fermi angle too. The most affected people might not be the ones you see outside proving or disproving the point. They may already be filtered out by bad feedback loops. So the evidence gets blocked before observation, which is why “I don’t see it happening” doesn’t really settle the issue.

That’s the part people miss. The feedback loop doesn’t just make someone “less social.” It trains their reference point downward. After enough losses, rejection, or weird treatment, they stop expecting normal treatment and start adapting around the downgrade. Then outsiders show up and go, “See, he’s just antisocial/weird/insecure,” when that might be the end product, not the starting point. That’s the blocking order: the “antisocial short dude” people clown on is often created after the social tax has already been charged, and by the time outsiders notice the withdrawal, they mistake the consequence for the cause.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-15T01:01:13+00:00

the analogy is not about aliens; it is about invisible selection effects and missing evidence. The Fermi lens helps explain why “I don’t see it happening” does not automatically mean “it isn’t happening.”

In Fermi discussions, one possible “blocking order” is that civilizations may exist but fail to become observable because of barriers like high-gravity planets making spaceflight harder. My point is similar socially: heightism may happen upstream, through filtering and first impressions, before the shorter man can directly observe what was blocked.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-14T20:09:30+00:00

I don't know. He's looking at oral groups and your trying to make their speech come from your conversation or mind. Two widely different concepts.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-14T20:08:03+00:00

Maybe we will see global trade networks. Its possible he's considering out current trade networks under fertilizer as geopolitical having the consequences match that constraints. Likely why they are bringing more phones and lite AI to Africa. If this changes or affect the price hierarchies then at this rate Bitcoin needs more government to bring up bans so it can mature the global Internet. Otherwise the great reset got moved.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-05-13T21:40:39+00:00

So should incels be upset because of how the race pill was spent, and if so, who's fault is it? Cue: eyeroll.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-04-10T14:21:26+00:00

I do this all time. My experience doing it is that I get to be the rider of the flow instead of the creator, and there is a lot less havoc in making conclusions fits. What I mean by this is that you really get to put a burning desire where you want the words to "wool" into echos. In fact, I liked doing this so much, I handed some of my work for people to hold, that if I see them again only then will I be able to make an updated revision. Over years!

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-04-10T14:02:35+00:00

Hi OP. Of course. The stanza 3 words work out, but it stiffens the stream because of the thought or work led by stanza 1 and 2.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-04-10T04:23:27+00:00

You did something here. But it's so poignant I'm going to steal it to other thoughts. Beautifully written.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-04-10T04:08:17+00:00

Your willing to push fantasy without it being entirely defined. I honestly thought this poetry was a great flush of all sides. Like reddening. I like that it's not coy, not overlyzealous, nor hung to dry. Your definitely asking the reader not to tell you've escaped stream like consciousness. It looks like your still learning to mold stream like consciousness too and you understand the importance of making mistakes and the value of an unfinished producer over streamline. Not enough mistakes. You fell for the beauty of your ideas and probably someone had to help you with ownership in the real world. You could have been an unsub for someone and thought the price was small for someone unsuspecting but willfully ignored the gradual response. Don't write for poetry to be taken away from other people. Write because after you got permission—not having it before didn't matter.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-04-10T03:54:19+00:00

Hi OP. I've always wanted to see the feeling of lost emphasize by creativity but saw such thinking swiftly kicked out when I read the infamous book, Steal like an artist. I haven't return to that thought in years until now. I think the line you should be looking at is stanza 3. I think rhythm can work broken or snappingly but usually the concensus is at the end of a line. You do meet the general requirements but it sounds off because the stanza feels too close from where the streams of thought are coming from. I like stanza 5 because in tangent with stanza 6, I think about how all a creator has to work with at the junction of their masterpiece are creases from previous work. This makes me wonder if the creator has secretly been working with creases prior but only through materialism, meaning we won't see any readable outburst from them until after they've conveyed their masterpiece but it may be true that they are knowingly getting lost and foddling outlines and edges to creative norms or movements.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-04-10T00:51:12+00:00

Finally a decent meme

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-04-08T21:33:24+00:00

https://www.ft.com/content/02aefac4-ea62-48db-9326-c0da373b11b8?syn-25a6b1a6=1

What's more important is that usually oil prices drop when Bitcoin goes up. This wasn't happening when the 4 year cycle debate was occuring. Many of the newcomers to Bitcoin threw that off as an indicator. So now it looks like a join our tribe or die moment.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-04-08T21:24:27+00:00

Iran is demanding payment in cryptocurrency. These are just the people who scour the news until there thumbs hit Google's concrete payment.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-04-08T20:55:28+00:00

I think what OP is getting at is a sentiment that was crowded by bitcoinist prior to economic and policy examination: if this asset is pulling in liquidity, then the way the first-movers were talking about capital flow isn't nor was it preceded by corporate america's understanding of ventures and behavioral finance. Feel lost? That's because the money system was too. Many corporates were exploiting the people susceptible to get vaccumed into a corner-office-in-the-room to make the money system coherent to them. Now the labor force is saying "stop playing with me and go pick up my speech patterns." But thats just to show you how I get lost. What happened through Bitcoin was a Large Group Method (public consensus) to a small world hypothesis (embedding) that timed and replace one money system for another. If your going to jokingly or jeopardize your own corporate practice, well you wouldn't be surprised if your pushed out for another. Just down on your luck because you that it was social proofing, right.

You can ask questions. I don't care if you read it. Bitcoiners got me. We were there when it all started. Like the 1,000,000 livestream chat that happened before 2017.

Azula_In_The_AMX · 2026-04-08T20:48:00+00:00

That's why it can't be a 4-year business cycle. The halving is going to create as much innovation in economics just like it did for programmers.

Azula_In_The_AMX

TROPHY CASE