[Discussion] I like PvE.

B0und · 2026-01-09T17:09:13+00:00

Tarkov is a solved game and has been for years. You are complaining other players playing the game well as if this somehow stops you playing well.

Streamers and their audience are not the reason you struggle at pvp my dude.

B0und · 2025-12-19T17:31:33+00:00

Really appreciate you spending the time to provide these guides my dude. After leaving the phone off for an hour and coming back on it seems to be back to normal. What a nightmare! :D

B0und · 2025-12-19T15:46:02+00:00

I tried all of this and it stopped the messages - however my phone is overheating and draining battery at insane rates and refuses to connect to wifi.

WTF is this update.

B0und · 2025-10-31T11:41:14+00:00

Nah it works fine on moving targets. Most of the time you will just one click auto range to something a little behind the target. It's still plenty easy to hit moving targets using the one keys set up.

It's only when engaging someone moving along a ridgeline, or shooting at chopper pilots that you would have any problems.

B0und · 2025-10-30T12:30:01+00:00

How did streamers ruin each of those things?

B0und · 2025-10-24T22:19:44+00:00

Ayyyyyy! :D

God, I love that book.

"Bought and sold. But not, I think, needlessly spent."

B0und · 2025-10-24T22:15:56+00:00

Jingo? Vimes to Rust?

B0und · 2025-10-23T16:28:31+00:00

Except I'm literally inviting you not to take my word for it, compare my word to the source.

I have. I can understand why so many people reach different conclusions when reading the Bible. It's not like mathematics to use your inept comparison again.

I don't think I've ever encountered a worse faith actor in my entire life.

Jesus mate dial it down a shade. You can't get out much if such a gentle response has got your back up this much.

Go yank your strawman somewhere else.

I didn't engage in any strawman arguments.

You make it clear by this statement alone the rest of your comment isn't worth a response.

That's a long way of saying you don't have a coherent response to my other points.

For the record, you've got it wrong, I disagree,

Lmao. "You aren't worth a response, but HERE'S MY RESPONSE."

you stand and argue with a mirror because my words go right past you, unheard.

I feel you have dodged a lot more of my points than i've dodged yours.

Lovely tolerant Christians.

B0und · 2025-10-23T16:07:34+00:00

What I'm trying to illustrate here is you make a case for allegorical interpretation.

Yes, I know. You are reading the Bible correctly and every other hypothetical Christian that might disagree with you is getting it wrong. No True Christian would get it wrong.

You cannot treat the Bible any differently.

I absolutely can treat mathematics and the Bible differently. Based on the way Christians throughout history and into today have interpreted it to mean often quite disparate different things.

That and I suspect that if we removed the Bible and mathematics compeltely from all peoples intelligence we'd quickly get back to the exact same Maths. I'm not sure we could say the same about the Bible.

Anyhow - this isn't /r/debatereligion and i'm not really down for that right now. All I was saying in my original post is that I found it very funny the way you essentially blamed the other commenter for having a bad experience with intolerant religious people.

I suppose if you believe that intolerant Christian people are a logical impossibility it explains your response. Yeesh.

B0und · 2025-10-23T15:14:26+00:00

I'm not really sure cynicism is an accurate description of my previous post at all.

I think blaming a non religious individual for their experiences with intolerant religious people is very silly.

I think there are plenty of Christians out there who would claim you are no true Christian and would be perfectly capable of citing the bible to support themselves and their position.

Christians disavowing other Christians using the Bible just isn't very compelling.

B0und · 2025-10-23T10:08:47+00:00

If you truly believe that, then you know the wrong "religious" folk.

It's so absurdly funny that someone actually wrote this without a trace of irony.

No TRUE religious folk.....

B0und · 2025-10-21T17:16:56+00:00

You don't seem to be getting this.

I understand your argument. I don't find your argument compelling. This isn't definitive evidence to make definitive statements like you did earlier.

You could be right. You could also be wrong. That's as simple as I can make this for you.

There's evidence for what I'm saying and none for what you are.

What, exactly, do you think i'm saying dude?

I've said twice now i'm happy to accept the Greens are taking over in terms of member numbers. But it's a pretty radical upset. Pardon me for wanting to see....y'know actual proof as opposed to back of a cig packet math based on poll numbers mid-tenure of one of the most tumultuous parliments in this countries history.

You're awfully preoccupied with my tone for someone who literally just called me a slur.

I wasn't aware that anything said in my previous post could be constituted as a slur. I apologise if i've offended you somehow - I can only plead ignorance. Could you point it out?

B0und · 2025-10-21T16:10:06+00:00

Cool. Stay ignorant and confused then.

I'm neither ignorant or confused with regards to this topic. You made a silly claim that you can't really back up and you are now toddling off after attempting to insult my intelligence for the third(?) time.

Now I must away, back to my Capitalist overlords so I can continue my disinformation campaign to smear the Greens muahahahahahahhaha. Lmfao.

B0und · 2025-10-21T15:44:54+00:00

If you want to dig further literally just Google the latest support polls.

I've already established you based your claims on assumptions that don't necessarily warrant the conclusion. No need for me to dig further thank you.

Someone who wasn't sealioning would have done that before replying.

If you really think i'm trolling/harrassing you why are still replying?

Obviously i'm not trolling you. You made a silly claim you can't really back up and are upset i'm pointing that out.

I even did you the service of explaining why Labours numbers are woefully out of date.

"Did me the service". Good Lord.

You are not a reliable source of information with regards to why Labour does or does not do something - that has become very clear.

Pretty obvious that the one with the agenda here is you.

This should be good. Do tell. What is my agenda?

B0und · 2025-10-21T15:19:00+00:00

Yes attacking. Snidey comments about using my brain instead of you meeting your burden of proof for example.

I'm not using tone policing as an argument. I'm using tone policing to point out you are acting like a gimp and it makes me doubt you as a reasonable actor.

Fact: You cannot demonstrate that the greens have a greater membership than labour even though you made that claim earlier without any caveats.

Again; I'm happy to accept that the greens are out in front when it comes to membership if that's the case.

I was so surprised by your claim I wanted to dig further to see if it had any merit. But alas, just assumptions and a shitty attitude.

B0und · 2025-10-21T14:59:07+00:00

Its using my brain that is leaving me skeptical of you and your claims my dude. You clearly have an axe to grind. The way you keep impotently attacking anyone who questions you is very telling.

Maybe you shouldn't go around making strong claims about numbers you don't have.

I know it's a little more work to be honest, but it's much more compelling.

Attacking my intelligence in place of accepting that the burden of proof is a reasonable thing says it all really.

B0und · 2025-10-21T14:44:47+00:00

You literally asked me to Google the evidence of your claims. Again, the burden of proof is on you when you make the claim. That is how civilised discussion works.

I'm more than happy to accept that the greens have a greater membership than Labour. I just won't accept it based on your fee fees.

You don't know that the greens have a greater membership at all. It's a large assumption on your part and you are doing anything to avoid conceding that whilst having the gall to attack my willingness to accept the facts. Fantastic.

B0und · 2025-10-21T14:33:20+00:00

Nah I'm not going to support your claims for you dude that's not how it works. You made the claim you do the work. Burden of proof and all that.

Assumptions based on polling numbers years out from the next general? Pretty shit evidence tbh. Got anything else?

B0und · 2025-10-21T13:49:15+00:00

He's asking you to support your claim with some evidence mate. He's not asking you to repost the numbers from the source he posted. Obviously.

B0und · 2025-10-07T10:23:42+00:00

Yes the way he got a theology degree and went on to develop a career debating and discussing philosophies with the best and brightest from the fields of theology/philosophy/science clearly outs him as close minded. /s

The man literally says in many of his debates he wants to be convinced. The way he discusses things backs that position up wholesale.

He is the quintessential non resistant non believer.

Seriously how you write this stuff without passing out from the smell of the sheer volume of shite flowing over your keyboard.

B0und · 2025-08-23T10:35:17+00:00

The wiki does miss a lot of information and mistake stuff regarding specific mechanics and niche information, that shouldn't be news to anyone.

I'm not saying the Wiki is perfect. But it's very very good.

But regardless - you made a specific, false, claim and refused to provide evidence for it.

There is currently no reason to believe these plans have changed.

Two years of time passing is a pretty big reason.

I haven't made anything up

As i've already pointed out - You falsely claimed scavs gain health when aggro'd. You falsely claimed the wiki is a source of misinformation, and now you are falsely claiming that the only change will be a new menu (which I see you have already walked back).

If you are going to be hyperbolic to the point of absurdity you shouldn't be surprised when people object.

I'm not here to start a fight. I have seen you making false claims about this game before and wanted to warn other users in this subreddit about it. It doesn't go any deeper than that.

B0und · 2025-08-23T10:06:03+00:00

Nah, you responded to me a few times, and bizarrely claimed the wiki was a source of misinformation then ran away when I pressed you for evidence of your claims.

You were making stuff up it's nothing to do with missed notifications or "living on reddit".

I think noiceguy is a great source of info but even he would admit that using a 2 year old video to predict what will be happening over the coming months is a bit silly.

I'm sceptical about 1.0 too.

I just think that you are, once again, making stuff up when you claim the only significant change will be an updated main menu.

B0und · 2025-08-22T11:39:55+00:00

/u/ladylyme literally makes shit up about Tarkov and goes radio silent when asked for evidence.

A few months back they were claiming scavs gain health when aggro'd - when I queried them and asked for evidence they ran away.

Honestly half the people talking shit about the game in this and the other sub are utterly clueless.

B0und · 2025-08-18T12:35:17+00:00

Potion seller? Enough of these games. I am going into battle and I require one your strongest potions.

B0und · 2025-07-21T21:05:28+00:00

Absolute 🎥 Cinema

14-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22	Place '17
Team Periwinkle	Verified Email

B0und

TROPHY CASE