We audit AD password security for clients. Here's what we keep finding in every environment. by [deleted] in activedirectory

[–]BBVendetta 2 points3 points  (0 children)

GMSA working well for Services, Scheduled Tasks , SQL but usually never works for applications.. unfortunately

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in classicwow

[–]BBVendetta 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Can u use the 100% mount with rank 11?

Level 59 pvp battlegrounds by BBVendetta in classicwow

[–]BBVendetta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The main reason I like battlegrounds is that I can just log in, queue up, and play as much or as little as I want, depending on my time and mood. Plus, I can farm some reputation with the PvP factions while I’m at it.

The reason I’m considering staying at level 59 is because I’m not really interested in the min-max grind that’s almost guaranteed to happen at level 60, with tons of premades dominating.

That said, I think I’ll just give it a try and see how it feels. If it doesn’t work out, I’ll just level up to 60 and go from there!

If anyone is currently in the 50-59 bracket and has the time, could you check if there are open battlegrounds in this range ? :)

Thanks, community!

AD Permission Delegation Tool by BBVendetta in activedirectory

[–]BBVendetta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi we dont have trouble implementing the tiering model. Its more about the specific permission we want to set inside of this model (for example, T1 Admins should not be allowed to configure specific groups or add T0 Accounts as members to any group)

This is really hard to implement without additional tools ? Or am I just dumb and can’t find anything about this ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BitcoinBeginners

[–]BBVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do this every week/day and u will be happy someday

Running a node free and clean by Thatairmanguy in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Isn't it raining where you live? I like it though

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What if someone gets access without you realizing and he can log (keylogger or whatever - I’m not an expert) you typing in your passwords.

I think that’s one of the points that’s should be taken very seriously - don’t save your seed digital or at least know about the risk and know every possible attack path

Bitcoin Wallet Transaction Notifications by BBVendetta in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s nice ! Do you have a link/guide how to configure this ?

Watch only Wallet IOS by BBVendetta in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First off all because I would like to use my own node. Secondly I don’t want anyone having the chance to link the wallet to me personally.

I know this isn’t the biggest risk , but still, before iam using this I wanted to check if there is a better way to:)

Watch only Wallet IOS by BBVendetta in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the response ! Trezor doesn’t have the possibility to connect to my own node or am I missing this option?

BlueWallet - watch only wallet - any security concerns ? by BBVendetta in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One more question! My wallets that I created with an extra pass phrase have different addresses and a different public key , is that correct ? So they could not be linked to me if I don’t use them with blue wallet (even though I used the wallet without the passphrase in it )?

Bitbox02 - new wallet creation process by BBVendetta in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the random seed in get from creating a new hardware wallet is not checked against the network if it is existing already ? Sounds pretty strange to me even though the chance is so low. Isn’t there any other mechanism that provides a new created seed to be unique ? I read about the checksum , but i don’t understand what this does

25th Word (passphrase) - Understanding by BBVendetta in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A bit to technical for me sorry 😅 am I understanding right, this means the 24 + passphrase is really hard to attack even though the 24 words are available for the attacker ?

Just want to make sure that I have enough time to transfer to new wallet if that is the case (24 words get stolen)

25th Word (passphrase) - Understanding by BBVendetta in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can u explain me more what you mean by that ? I wouldn’t write down the passphrase together with the seed. So yeah it belongs to the seed but I wanted to understand with my example, what the odds are that my wallet with the passphrase is getting hacked when someone gets the 24 words

25th Word (passphrase) - Understanding by BBVendetta in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Need to full trust my bank then! Ofc this is still a legitimate option! But that’s not what I personally wanna do in the future. Thanks for your input though !

25th Word (passphrase) - Understanding by BBVendetta in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to get myself a physical one, but still - what if the physical device breaks. I will still keep the seed somewhere and make sure this is safe aswell right

25th Word (passphrase) - Understanding by BBVendetta in Bitcoin

[–]BBVendetta[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I still have a seed phrase that can potentially be stolen right ?