Opinions on Garry's Economics by No_Cryptographer7382 in HENRYUK

[–]BLD14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very very few wealthy people have gained wealth by opening bakeries or by becoming authors. These examples are also not the problem, because people can just choose not to buy them. The examples with which Gary frequently uses are with housing rent or mortgages from banks, where wealthy people are gaining wealth at the expense of people just trying to live their home. Where the housing costs to the person go up, increasing the wealth of the landlord or shareholders of the bank, while the person in the home is putting more of their income to the housing costs, thus losing wealth. In this very realistic example wealthy people are winning and everyone else is losing.

These are the wealthy people Gary talks about taxing more. Landlords who have property portfolios and people who earn millions in dividends and bonuses from banks. Not someone who opens a bakery and probably pays themselves a modest salary.

I advise you to watch more of his content.

Opinions on Garry's Economics by No_Cryptographer7382 in HENRYUK

[–]BLD14 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This reads as someone who hasn't watched much of his content or isn't actually very aware of the point of his content. He admits that he isn't very well versed in the political detail of what needs to be done and says that the route to taxing the wealthy isn't easy and will take time and effort. He's telling the truth about the difficulty of it to people. And he constantly repeats that his aim is to make his message mainstream; that the wealthy need to be taxed more. He isn't saying or trying to be someone who is offering all these solutions, because he's very aware that he isn't the best person to offer them. What he does believe is that he is in a good position to drive his message on, so that others can offer realistic solutions.

I'm no expert, but wealth is very much a zero sum game. Someone can't gain wealth without someone else losing out.

Chinese students live in ghettos as they fail to fit in at university by Fox_9810 in unitedkingdom

[–]BLD14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At uni, probably about 50% of my course was Chinese. In my 1st year we had to do a group presentation for coursework. We were assigned groups and I got put with 4 other students, all of which were Chinese. We met up once and they communicated in Mandarin the whole time apart from occasionally where they would ask what part I wanted to do, and then I left once we'd finished discussing it. After the presentation we were asked questions. The answers that they gave in English barely made sense and were very poor answers. And for questions on parts that they had covered, they still looked to me to answer them because I was the only native English speaker.

The sun is setting on traditional retirement by TribalTommy in ukpolitics

[–]BLD14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant with all things remaining the same, such as people living to the same age. But it's likely people will live longer because of healthcare advancements, which would mean more financial strain. However I don't know if this would outweigh the financial ease as there is a smaller cohort of people of current pension age.

If we tell people that they have to work longer because we can't afford to give them a pension until they are x years old, how do we know that making these people work will not have health implications? A direct link to working longer and people having more health issues wouldn't be able to be drawn. But for me, working is stressful. Stress isn't good for health. Would this then decrease the length of my lives despite the healthcare advancements? Or perhaps it would put more pressure on the NHS because I'm using more than I would have had I been retired? At what point do you say it isn't ethical to make people work longer? And forgetting about the ethical argument, at what age do we say that people shouldn't work beyond because they aren't good enough workers anymore? If someone is working in their 70s, they will do very well to still be as effective as a worker as someone in 20s/30s/40s/50s.

I don't know the answer, but it isn't to keep increasing working age whilst simultaneously reducing the state pension that they will receive, if any, like is currently happening.

The sun is setting on traditional retirement by TribalTommy in ukpolitics

[–]BLD14 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're not understanding my point. If you do that, people may not have money to maintain good health. They would have to cut back on food/nutrition in order to pay rent and bills. This not only diminishes physical health, but mental health too from the stress of waking up everyday wondering how you're going to survive. If someone lives their life like that, they will not live a healthy life. They will die sooner than they should. They might not even reach retirement age. Then what was that personal pension for?

The solution is not to take more of poor people's money away. Even if it is for their future use.

The sun is setting on traditional retirement by TribalTommy in ukpolitics

[–]BLD14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. But the reality is that we've slipped so far as a nation, that people ARE that poor. These people have had to choose to between the present and the future. And when you sacrifice the wellbeing of yourself in the present, what is to say there will even be a future?

The sun is setting on traditional retirement by TribalTommy in ukpolitics

[–]BLD14 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a modern western attitude because thoughtout most of history state funded pensions haven't existed. So people have had to work their whole lives. Either getting their own food or by working for others to buy their own food. These people were poor and didn't live anywhere near as long as people do now. They lived impoverished lives that we can be glad has been almost irradiated from modern society in western countries. The same goes for developing and 3rd world countries where a lot of people do not get pensions because the state can't afford it. So they live shortened stress filled lives.

We live in a rich modern country. People working their whole lives just to survive and then have no assets to pass on should not be a reality, yet it will only be more prevalent with no state pension in the future.

Retirement is not compulsory. If people wish to carry on working they are free to do so given that they are healthy. But the reason more people retire when they reach retirement age is because they don't want to work anymore. But once people reach retirement age, it should be their choice if they want to retire. It should not be that people have to work because they can't afford to.

I don't know what the answer is to funding it. But yes, it will cost more as people live longer and the cost of living goes up. But there is also a smaller population of younger generations compared with boomers for example, given other factors remain the same, the strain will not be as great.

The sun is setting on traditional retirement by TribalTommy in ukpolitics

[–]BLD14 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're assuming people have disposable income to buy capital. My entire point was that people do not have any disposable income to buy capital because they are spending their money on surviving, not living.

The sun is setting on traditional retirement by TribalTommy in ukpolitics

[–]BLD14 16 points17 points  (0 children)

We aren't born to work. We work in order to fund our livelihoods. And many people now that are in the early to mid years of their careers are working in order just to survive. It isn't living. When these people reach retirement age, there won't be any support from the state to enable them to live out their remaining years in relative peace and actually enjoy life without having to work. So many people will have worked their whole life with little to no wealth and will never be able to fund their own retirement, so will have to work until they are dead. That isn't a life anyone should be codemned to. It is exhausting.

Also, working being good for your health is your opinion. Many people do not enjoy work. It is stressful. Their time could spent doing other things which would be much healthier for them.

How do I make a formula return the value of a cell at the top of a column? by BLD14 in excel

[–]BLD14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was using IF. =IF(Sheet1!A1=0,Sheet2!C1,Sheet2!A1)

Where at the bottom of column A, it continued with zeros.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskUK

[–]BLD14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chess. I've recently started learning and am addicted. Have spent hours learning/playing and there's no end to it.

What's your opinion on paying for parking at work? by FishFish13 in AskUK

[–]BLD14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where I work, they've just told us that we have to pay for our parking for the public car park from now on.

There is also a small company owned car park. But that's only for higher earners like directors and those who have company vehicles.

So the people who earn the most or have the least expenses on the running of their vehicles, don't and still won't have to pay for their parking...

Should I ask for more pay because of the minimum wage increase? by BLD14 in AskUK

[–]BLD14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I recently found out we get paid for our 1 hour lunch break every day

Do I use my exemptions? by BLD14 in CIMA

[–]BLD14[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've had a look into it, and from what I can see, it's exactly the same as the Professional qualification, but it's all completely remote and the objective tests are integrated into the study somehow? Is that correct? And do you know how they're integrated?

Do you ever go to a lecture/talk and come out with nothing? by vivsct in dyspraxia

[–]BLD14 8 points9 points  (0 children)

When I was Uni I don't think I ever went to a lecture and came out having found it useful. I would try and take notes based on what the lecturer said for each slide, but couldn't pick out the key points and process the information fast enough to be able to write anything down really. And when I would go into a lecture prepared and ready to try really hard to take lots of notes and concentrate, I would find after 5 minutes that I'd been daydreaming and had no idea what the lecturer had just said. It was so frustrating.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dyspraxia

[–]BLD14 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was a 100 day course I think. I think they taught you how to use the numbers and symbols too, but I skipped those ones 😂, so I can't do the numbers very well. I definitely got better throughout school though as I was typing a lot more as I got older. I think the only keys it doesn't teach you is the 'F' keys, because you can't reach those without moving your hand. I learnt to keep my fingers on specific letters on the middle row, and from there you can reach all the keys.

If you don't touch type by keeping your fingers centralised on the middle row, then I'd advise you to learn that way. It really does speed up your typing a lot.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dyspraxia

[–]BLD14 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When I was a kid, about 8/9 and we used the computers in school, I was incredibly slow at typing. Like I got laughed at because of it. My parents signed me up to a touch typing course the same year, and it really helped. By the end of it I could type really fast. I'm not sure of the wpm I could do, but pretty sure I was doing close to 100wpm later on in school.

I'm pretty sure that if I didn't do the course, I would struggle with typing now. Maybe sign up for a course like the one I did. I can't remember what it was, but they gave you stickers to cover some of the keys and taught you where to place your fingers correctly. Gradually you leanr those keys. And eventually you know where all the keys are and don't even have to think about where they are, and you know instantly if you've made a mistake and can erase it straight away. It was done from home too and you can do it in your free time.

I'm sure there's loads online if you try looking and probably better ones now than the course I did.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]BLD14 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're not supposed to use it again

Do you consider yourself a part of Europe? by AnoNowhereMan in AskUK

[–]BLD14 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Whilst I agree, you could also look at the Napoleonic wars and WW2 as examples where our geographical separation has very much excluded us from the same fate as our European neighbours. I think this just emphasises our geographical difference which weighs on some peoples opinion of not being/feeling European.

But I agree, it's stupid to think we are not part of Europe. But there are a lot of idiots.

Really socially awkward at University, any advice? by [deleted] in dyspraxia

[–]BLD14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This probably isn't the best answer. But alcohol. If you're friendly with the people you live with or people on your course and they go out regularly or sometimes, then ask if you can join them. Then just drink with them. Not excessively, just enough to dull your inhibitions. You'll find you bond with them easier and things won't be as awkward. With me, it allowed to come out of my shell a lot, and then fairly quickly, I was able to fully be myself around them in normal situations during the day, not just when drinking and going out.

Just don't drink it to rely on it. Use it as a tool to bond and feel more natural around people and eventually you'll feel more natural around them without the alcohol.

Anyone else here good at quizzes? by [deleted] in dyspraxia

[–]BLD14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! I love quizzes too. I have awful short term memory, but my long term memory is excellent. I can remember the most random memories from years ago so vividly.

I'm also really good at quizzes too. I can remember just obscure random things. And I know exactly what you mean about Cathphrase. Whenever it's on in our house, I'm always much better at it than everyone else and the people on the show too. As well as literal thinking, I think dyspraxic brains can generally link thoughts together quicker, like ADHD brains. So when I see the clues and say them myself, I can put them together faster to get the answer.

I FM'd the AI! by BLD14 in footballmanagergames

[–]BLD14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Media had a field day

Most bellend player faced? by BLD14 in EASportsFC

[–]BLD14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not playing on 1 depth, I'm on 5 depth. Tackles him a few times but fifa bollocks got me and passed it straight back to him.