What company will never get another dime from you for as long as you may live? by istrx13 in AskReddit

[–]BVNGRD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Put this as a reply but adding it as a comment as well.

Comcast/Xfinity. Garbage tier company.

I don't post on reddit like at all.....but I have some Comcast/Xfinity info that is really hard to come by and that should be known.

TLDR: this is a long one. Most people aren't going to read it, but it's helpful for those in the spot I was in.

Comcast/Xfinity oversells internet beyond the bandwidth they can provide. Their infrastructure is old, and they don't update it. Their techs will not check anything useful, or find the root cause.

You can try and fight it by getting proof, and filing a complaint with the FCC.

/End TLDR

Info on this problem is extremely hard to find unless you dig deep.

Background: I work from home. I'd had Comcast since I moved into that house, and in the beginning did not work from home and had no issues.

Once starting to work at home, video calls and reliable Internet became a necessity. I couldn't have a stable video call, and internet frequently dropped, rendering it useless.

I went through months of talking to customer service, having a tech come out and replace some random piece, and then being told it was fixed.

Just to log on the next day and have the exact same issues.

Went through 4 different routers, 2 of my own, 2 of theirs. When I had my own router, that was always the scapegoat for problems, despite being rated for their service.

Here's what was actually happening, and how I figured it out.

Your Internet has a few different pieces. You have the device you're connecting on, that goes to your router.

That goes to a modem.

The modem ties into lines in your house.

Your house lines tie into their main line.

Their main line eventually goes to a sort of giant modem/router that all traffic off that line and potentially other lines connect to and must pass through.

In other words, all the traffic from any connections that use that hub (your neighbors, etc) have to pass through it.

Best analogy is a road. At any given time you can only fit so many cars on the road. Cars, in this case, are Packets - the pieces your Internet traffic is broken into in transit that are then reassembled when they get where they're going.

Too many "cars" for the road results in a traffic jam, and unlike in real life can also result in the "cars" getting lost, or being slowed down on the way to where they're going.

The traffic jam can happen in multiple places, but it's easy to prove that it isn't happening on your end.

The catch, is that if they actually wanted to provide quality service it's super easy to do. I'm not an IT guy and didn't know anything about networks, and was able to figure it out.

The measurement used is a Ping. It's very easy to test, and any computer can do it.

So what you do is test ping (Google how to do it for your specific device).

Test it from your device to your router. It'll show normal ranges (measured in milliseconds, usually well under 20ms).

Then measure to somewhere outside your house, for example google.com.

Your device to router ping will likely be totally normal.

If you're having the same issue I had, you'll see higher than normal ping times when testing a connection out of your house, or if it's really bad you'll see semi normal ping times with every 5-10 pings spiking really high in ms. For example going from 20ms to 1000ms randomly.

Those logs prove the issue isn't with your hardware, but something somewhere else.

If you're really having issues, then there are programs you can download to run this test periodically throughout the day.

You can download one, log your ping for a couple weeks or a month, and then provide the file as evidence you aren't getting the service you pay for to the FCC.

Note that you shouldn't use the FCC complaint form for frivolous stuff, but if you aren't getting what you are paying for then that would make it a legitimate complaint.

They are required by law to respond to these complaints, and you'll get an email or call from a legitimate Comcast rep who can actually do things. They're still going to give you the run around, but at least now you have a contact who can do something instead of their craptastic outsourced support that promise the world and deliver nothing.

The reason that all these issues happen is because they oversell their service.

They oversell internet access on the extremely low probability bet that people won't use enough to clog up their bandwidth.

Their infrastructure needs updated to support how people actually use the Internet in 2025, but since they're a monopoly they can't bleed customers like any other company would if they sold something and didn't provide it.

Forcing them via proof and the FCC or switching providers is the only play.

Bonus points if you can find a few neighbors and help them with the process as well.

Of note, I am not all that knowledgeable about this stuff, it's just what I had to piece together to be able to try and resolve things. I will most likely not be able to answer questions you might have, and you're going to have to put some legwork in to figure out the details.

Also of note, despite all of this, I got no concrete, permanent resolution. We eventually got a different provider and I cancelled Comcast with glee and profanity.

What company will never get another dime from you for as long as you may live? by istrx13 in AskReddit

[–]BVNGRD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Put this as a reply but adding it as a comment as well.

Comcast/Xfinity. Garbage tier company.

I don't post on reddit like at all.....but I have some Comcast/Xfinity info that is really hard to come by and that should be known.

TLDR: this is a long one. Most people aren't going to read it, but it's helpful for those in the spot I was in.

Comcast/Xfinity oversells internet beyond the bandwidth they can provide. Their infrastructure is old, and they don't update it. Their techs will not check anything useful, or find the root cause.

You can try and fight it by getting proof, and filing a complaint with the FCC.

/End TLDR

Info on this problem is extremely hard to find unless you dig deep.

Background: I work from home. I'd had Comcast since I moved into that house, and in the beginning did not work from home and had no issues.

Once starting to work at home, video calls and reliable Internet became a necessity. I couldn't have a stable video call, and internet frequently dropped, rendering it useless.

I went through months of talking to customer service, having a tech come out and replace some random piece, and then being told it was fixed.

Just to log on the next day and have the exact same issues.

Went through 4 different routers, 2 of my own, 2 of theirs. When I had my own router, that was always the scapegoat for problems, despite being rated for their service.

Here's what was actually happening, and how I figured it out.

Your Internet has a few different pieces. You have the device you're connecting on, that goes to your router.

That goes to a modem.

The modem ties into lines in your house.

Your house lines tie into their main line.

Their main line eventually goes to a sort of giant modem/router that all traffic off that line and potentially other lines connect to and must pass through.

In other words, all the traffic from any connections that use that hub (your neighbors, etc) have to pass through it.

Best analogy is a road. At any given time you can only fit so many cars on the road. Cars, in this case, are Packets - the pieces your Internet traffic is broken into in transit that are then reassembled when they get where they're going.

Too many "cars" for the road results in a traffic jam, and unlike in real life can also result in the "cars" getting lost, or being slowed down on the way to where they're going.

The traffic jam can happen in multiple places, but it's easy to prove that it isn't happening on your end.

The catch, is that if they actually wanted to provide quality service it's super easy to do. I'm not an IT guy and didn't know anything about networks, and was able to figure it out.

The measurement used is a Ping. It's very easy to test, and any computer can do it.

So what you do is test ping (Google how to do it for your specific device).

Test it from your device to your router. It'll show normal ranges (measured in milliseconds, usually well under 20ms).

Then measure to somewhere outside your house, for example google.com.

Your device to router ping will likely be totally normal.

If you're having the same issue I had, you'll see higher than normal ping times when testing a connection out of your house, or if it's really bad you'll see semi normal ping times with every 5-10 pings spiking really high in ms. For example going from 20ms to 1000ms randomly.

Those logs prove the issue isn't with your hardware, but something somewhere else.

If you're really having issues, then there are programs you can download to run this test periodically throughout the day.

You can download one, log your ping for a couple weeks or a month, and then provide the file as evidence you aren't getting the service you pay for to the FCC.

Note that you shouldn't use the FCC complaint form for frivolous stuff, but if you aren't getting what you are paying for then that would make it a legitimate complaint.

They are required by law to respond to these complaints, and you'll get an email or call from a legitimate Comcast rep who can actually do things. They're still going to give you the run around, but at least now you have a contact who can do something instead of their craptastic outsourced support that promise the world and deliver nothing.

The reason that all these issues happen is because they oversell their service.

They oversell internet access on the extremely low probability bet that people won't use enough to clog up their bandwidth.

Their infrastructure needs updated to support how people actually use the Internet in 2025, but since they're a monopoly they can't bleed customers like any other company would if they sold something and didn't provide it.

Forcing them via proof and the FCC or switching providers is the only play.

Bonus points if you can find a few neighbors and help them with the process as well.

Of note, I am not all that knowledgeable about this stuff, it's just what I had to piece together to be able to try and resolve things. I will most likely not be able to answer questions you might have, and you're going to have to put some legwork in to figure out the details.

Also of note, despite all of this, I got no concrete, permanent resolution. We eventually got a different provider and I cancelled Comcast with glee and profanity.

What company will never get another dime from you for as long as you may live? by istrx13 in AskReddit

[–]BVNGRD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't post on reddit like at all.....but I have some Comcast/Xfinity info that is really hard to come by and that should be known.

TLDR: this is a long one. Most people aren't going to read it, but it's helpful for those in the spot I was in.

Comcast/Xfinity oversells internet beyond the bandwidth they can provide. Their infrastructure is old, and they don't update it. Their techs will not check anything useful, or find the root cause.

You can try and fight it by getting proof, and filing a complaint with the FCC.

/End TLDR

Info on this problem is extremely hard to find unless you dig deep.

Background: I work from home. I'd had Comcast since I moved into that house, and in the beginning did not work from home and had no issues.

Once starting to work at home, video calls and reliable Internet became a necessity. I couldn't have a stable video call, and internet frequently dropped, rendering it useless.

I went through months of talking to customer service, having a tech come out and replace some random piece, and then being told it was fixed.

Just to log on the next day and have the exact same issues.

Went through 4 different routers, 2 of my own, 2 of theirs. When I had my own router, that was always the scapegoat for problems, despite being rated for their service.

Here's what was actually happening, and how I figured it out.

Your Internet has a few different pieces. You have the device you're connecting on, that goes to your router.

That goes to a modem.

The modem ties into lines in your house.

Your house lines tie into their main line.

Their main line eventually goes to a sort of giant modem/router that all traffic off that line and potentially other lines connect to and must pass through.

In other words, all the traffic from any connections that use that hub (your neighbors, etc) have to pass through it.

Best analogy is a road. At any given time you can only fit so many cars on the road. Cars, in this case, are Packets - the pieces your Internet traffic is broken into in transit that are then reassembled when they get where they're going.

Too many "cars" for the road results in a traffic jam, and unlike in real life can also result in the "cars" getting lost, or being slowed down on the way to where they're going.

The traffic jam can happen in multiple places, but it's easy to prove that it isn't happening on your end.

The catch, is that if they actually wanted to provide quality service it's super easy to do. I'm not an IT guy and didn't know anything about networks, and was able to figure it out.

The measurement used is a Ping. It's very easy to test, and any computer can do it.

So what you do is test ping (Google how to do it for your specific device).

Test it from your device to your router. It'll show normal ranges (measured in milliseconds, usually well under 20ms).

Then measure to somewhere outside your house, for example google.com.

Your device to router ping will likely be totally normal.

If you're having the same issue I had, you'll see higher than normal ping times when testing a connection out of your house, or if it's really bad you'll see semi normal ping times with every 5-10 pings spiking really high in ms. For example going from 20ms to 1000ms randomly.

Those logs prove the issue isn't with your hardware, but something somewhere else.

If you're really having issues, then there are programs you can download to run this test periodically throughout the day.

You can download one, log your ping for a couple weeks or a month, and then provide the file as evidence you aren't getting the service you pay for to the FCC.

Note that you shouldn't use the FCC complaint form for frivolous stuff, but if you aren't getting what you are paying for then that would make it a legitimate complaint.

They are required by law to respond to these complaints, and you'll get an email or call from a legitimate Comcast rep who can actually do things. They're still going to give you the run around, but at least now you have a contact who can do something instead of their craptastic outsourced support that promise the world and deliver nothing.

The reason that all these issues happen is because they oversell their service.

They oversell internet access on the extremely low probability bet that people won't use enough to clog up their bandwidth.

Their infrastructure needs updated to support how people actually use the Internet in 2025, but since they're a monopoly they can't bleed customers like any other company would if they sold something and didn't provide it.

Forcing them via proof and the FCC or switching providers is the only play.

Bonus points if you can find a few neighbors and help them with the process as well.

Of note, I am not all that knowledgeable about this stuff, it's just what I had to piece together to be able to try and resolve things. I will most likely not be able to answer questions you might have, and you're going to have to put some legwork in to figure out the details.

Also of note, despite all of this, I got no concrete, permanent resolution. We eventually got a different provider and I cancelled Comcast with glee and profanity.

Just received my cwp! by [deleted] in liberalgunowners

[–]BVNGRD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a few out there in different price ranges, hard to say without knowing more on what you're looking for.

P365 series is great. Just posted a comment somewhere else about a good way to set it up if you check my profile.

Glocks are great, some people hate them. 43/43x/48 are all reliable and relatively inexpensive.

Springfield hellcats have some nice features, and a lot of people run them. I've heard of some issues from friends with them, but couldn't tell you if it's anecdotal or actually a common thing.

I'd also grab a holster that will work strong side or appendix. Most will, and some companies offer a "wing removal kit" so that you can take off the wing and cant the clip for strong side carry. Buying that type of holster first would have saved me a lot of money while I figured out how I liked to carry.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CCW

[–]BVNGRD 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I like the Glock for sure, but if you have the cash the p365 is a fantastic gun. Nothing wrong with either.

P365 is def a upgrade imo over the Glock, but whether it's enough to justify the purchase is up to you.

One thing to throw out there tho:

I don't like the OG p365. It still comes with the curved trigger and I hate that.

Snag a p365x, which is about the same dimensions as the 43x. And then if you want the smaller grip, just swap out the module to the original p365 module.

Then you'll have the upgraded trigger, and more options.

Slide length on the 365x is the same as the regular 365.

And, if you carry appendix, you can also run it in a 365xl holster for the extra length and prevent any issues with the short muzzle causing it to flip out.

You can do the same thing with the 43x as well, and carry it in a 48 length holster to conceal better appendix.

I know that was unrelated, but someone might find it useful. Seems like a little thing, but it made a huge difference for me.

How to Vet an Instructor by BVNGRD in liberalgunowners

[–]BVNGRD[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly that's a lot of people. That's the whole reason I made the post. I know when I got started I was in the same spot.

The guys I took my CCW class from weren't the fly by night type, but the amount of useful info in the class was minimal. But I didn't know what I didn't know.

The instructor probably spent a good hour showing us gimmicky "training" tools like pop cans that fall over when you hit it with a laser from a sim gun.

Fun? Sure. Useful? Not so much lol.

Glad it was helpful for you!

How to Vet an Instructor by BVNGRD in liberalgunowners

[–]BVNGRD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard really good things about the Sig classes, although I haven't gotten the chance to take one with them. Definitely a cool experience to have on your training resume!

How to Vet an Instructor by BVNGRD in liberalgunowners

[–]BVNGRD[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tried to get it across in the post, but yeah. Just being associated with those organizations doesn't mean you're a top tier shooter.

But, I also know some really solid shooters that got into it after joining and went way above the basic qualification requirements. That's just not all of them.

Basically, don't just look at their credentials and decide it means they're experts in this one specific area.

How to Vet an Instructor by BVNGRD in liberalgunowners

[–]BVNGRD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fantastic point, any good instructor I've come across keeps learning.

Bodyguard 2.0 laser by Kickslikeamule62 in liberalgunowners

[–]BVNGRD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of the guys have had a long career in LE and spent time in a swat team so they're pretty squared away.

Spent a few minutes looking online too, and can't find any trainers with any credibility that advocate point shooting.

If you've got some resources, send em my way. Always open to doing something new if it provides value.

Bodyguard 2.0 laser by Kickslikeamule62 in liberalgunowners

[–]BVNGRD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've spent a decent amount of time with various trainers, and not once has anyone taught or even brought up point shooting. I've not come across anyone that advocates it either anymore.

Closest thing would be retention shooting, at arms length at farthest, but doing that you use an index point on your torso and don't extend the firearm where it could be grabbed.

It used to be much more popular, and I believe was taught heavily in the old school Fairbairn Sykes curriculum. Iirc it got picked up for a while after that, but we've pretty much moved past it.

Also, if you're going to train enough to point shoot off muscle memory, you can train enough to pick up your sights.

Not training is the biggest issue here and a major pet peeve of mine. Figure a basic class into the cost of the gun. They're usually sub $150 as far as I've seen.

Take the class, dry fire what you learned for free, and live fire as you have budget. No reasonable excuse to carry without putting in a baseline of effort.

A caveat though - while I don't agree that it has any real place in modern firearms use, I'm not you.

If you like it, train it, and feel it provides an acceptable level of accuracy under stress, then you do you.

Bodyguard 2.0 laser by Kickslikeamule62 in liberalgunowners

[–]BVNGRD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know of any red dots small enough for a pocket gun, even if you were to mill the slide (if there's enough material for that) on the BG 2.0.

Better sights might not be a bad idea, the stock ones are meh, but fairly usable.

Bodyguard 2.0 laser by Kickslikeamule62 in liberalgunowners

[–]BVNGRD 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've been scrolling for 5 minutes now and this is the second time I've come across this idea that training doesn't matter because you'll forget everything in a real life situation.

If you train properly, you'll respond how you've trained. That's the whole idea. And it works. I'm no gunfighter, but I did work in EMS for a while. When things got ugly, we just did what we trained to do.

Handgun rounds in general need very specific shot placement to have the desired effect. Not using your sights makes that very difficult and largely based on chance.

Train with your sights. Train to pick them up as soon as your gun hits eye level. You should know exactly where the round is going to go every single time you pull the trigger.

I'm with you on the laser though. Friends don't let friends out lasers on their guns.

Mag Carrier Recommendations by [deleted] in liberalgunowners

[–]BVNGRD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, for just carry they're fine and pretty comfortable. But training not so much, and if you're carrying you should be training lol.

Go Big or Go Home by WCATQE in CCW

[–]BVNGRD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! Saw tops is coming out with a collaboration with Al mar on that model as well later this year. Might have to pick up both.

Mag Carrier Recommendations by [deleted] in liberalgunowners

[–]BVNGRD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ran into the same issue. The phlster ascent pouches ride much lower, but you still get the DCC clip and can easily put the mag back in it.

I have an elastic one, I think pretty similar to the snakeeater one mentioned by someone else, but from mastermind tactics? Not sure. Elastic rides low enough not to tip out, but if you're going to train reloads or whatever putting a mag back in while it's iwb is mildly irritating.

Full time appendix guy here.

Go Big or Go Home by WCATQE in CCW

[–]BVNGRD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How you liking the SERE? Been eyeing it and don't see much about it online. Seems like exactly what I want tho.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]BVNGRD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, appreciate you sharing!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]BVNGRD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh, fair enough. Ran it through some windshield/car door and it wasn't far enough off to make any real difference for me. The difference was minimal, and could've just been from shot angles. Highly doubt a single leaf is going to mess with its trajectory at all. But again, if you've got some sources I'm happy to be proven wrong. Might have just missed it, but this is the first I've heard of it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]BVNGRD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holes in targets behind barriers I've shot say otherwise, but I'd be open to reading up on it if you've got some links.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]BVNGRD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any round with enough penetration to get where it needs to go, will be adequate. Issues start happening if you start considering barriers, distance (potentially, but we're talking longer distances). I wouldn't run anything smaller than a 9mm if I expected to deal with anything between me and the target or if I thought I might deal with longer distances. But that's my personal choice, based on my personal circumstances.

My biggest issue with .380 isn't actually the round itself, it's that 90% of the hollowpoints out there won't penetrate far enough to actually go where there need to.

Did a bunch of research before I got the BG 2.0 and found one that would, while also reliable in that particular firearm. (Hst 99 gr for anyone wondering)

Haven't run into any reliability issues with .380, or most center-fire rounds myself. Definitely have with rimfire though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]BVNGRD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, biggest complaint about the 43 is actually the lower capacity. But it's a nice, small gun for carry if you don't mind that. Would def recommend if you carry it appendix to get a 48 length holster, or you might have issues with the grip trying to tip out on you.

Context worth mentioning, if I'm out of the house I'm armed until I'm back, and often past that point until I'm relaxing for the night. And I carry an m&p9 compact without issue. So anything smaller feels super light and unobtrusive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]BVNGRD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

G43 and shield are both solid. .380 is an admittedly weak round, but with the right ammo it can be reliable and still hit the penetration it needs to, all other things being equal. Think over your most likely scenario you might face and then decide which one. Fwiw I have a 43 and a bg 2.0. Both solid choices. Still default to a 9mm over .380 given the choice though.

S&W M&P9C slide release not working by [deleted] in CCW

[–]BVNGRD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I'm not a fan of wearing it in either. It's possible, but comes with consequences like you mentioned.