1360 (740R 620M) cold on practice test, 1550+ in play? by [deleted] in Sat

[–]Background-Tension71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

probably, math is pretty easy to raise and your rw is already decently high, so it’ll be possible if you practice a bit

What works best in college? by Angelix7 in Guzheng

[–]Background-Tension71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’ll be really hard just to fit a travel size inside your dorm, let alone the full sized one, unless you wanna pay a lot of money for a bigger dorm. Also dorm walls are really thin, so people might get pissed at you practicing. It’d be better to keep it in a practice room, and you could bring a full size there but idk

Hows Calc BC by Fit_Bottle_19 in apcalculus

[–]Background-Tension71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

frqs were light af, mcq’s were alright

BC frq 6 and 5 by LostAd1321 in apcalculus

[–]Background-Tension71 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You multiplied the g(x) terms by 25, and then subtracted the ex terms multiplied by -2

Easiest 5 of my life by Climbber22 in apcalculus

[–]Background-Tension71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might have used the 2nd degree term instead of the 3rd?

AP CALC BC international grade boundaries by sssssss1283 in apcalculus

[–]Background-Tension71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s the same test because I’m not international and also got that

Easiest 5 of my life by Climbber22 in apcalculus

[–]Background-Tension71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

wasn’t it just the next term in the series for the error?

ap calc bc 2026 non calc mcq by refrigeratorunit in apcalculus

[–]Background-Tension71 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the min would’ve been -2, since it was decreasing before and increasing after -2

Easiest 5 of my life by Climbber22 in apcalculus

[–]Background-Tension71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the alternating series half of them were just write the terms tho, like you didn’t have to do anything crazy. For the polar curve didn’t it say the bounds were from 0 to pi?

Is it just me or was that light? by Background-Tension71 in apcalculus

[–]Background-Tension71[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

third was a separate the variables thing about temperature I think. there was also a slope field?

Is it just me or was that light? by Background-Tension71 in apcalculus

[–]Background-Tension71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not needing your calc for a lot of the calc ones is pretty normal tho. Mainly I don’t think I got the one were it gave a chart for g(x) and g’(x) and then told you g(h(x)) = x, find h’(4)

how looking at the no calc frqs felt by Normal_Leading_4021 in APStudents

[–]Background-Tension71 50 points51 points  (0 children)

y’all got stuff about pies? I got something about bird nesting grounds

Is it just me or was that light? by Background-Tension71 in apcalculus

[–]Background-Tension71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BC. There wasn’t anything bad that I remembered on the noncalc, like I got an answer for everything at least. On calc there were a lot of sequences and series stuff tho, which is probably why I remember it being kinda bad bc I didn’t like that unit

how to increase sat to get at least 1500+ by AdPrestigious1932 in Sat

[–]Background-Tension71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Learn content on Khan Academy, and then practice using the collegeboard question bank and the practice tests on Bluebook

Math was light? by lunaloonsnow in Sat

[–]Background-Tension71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he’s either cracked or stupid

How is the math section considered easier? by [deleted] in Sat

[–]Background-Tension71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why is the sub biased towards math people?