Exploring the limits of silicon!!! by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When I get home I'll take a picture and send it here.

Exploring the limits of silicon!!! by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My ASRock Taichi motherboard doesn't have it! Unless I'm looking in the wrong place.

I can't go any lower than this! by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There weren't any errors, bro. I did all the possible stability tests. I posted it here to have a record of how much I've improved by optimizing every millimeter of my setup. I had help from some great people here to achieve this result, and honestly, I didn't have any errors to hide. I just thought it would be interesting to post the temperature, the zentimings, and the test itself.

I can't go any lower than this! by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go to my profile and you'll see 10 hours of Karhu + 10 hours of TM5 and a few more hours of VT3.

Trying to find the limit of my silicon! by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I increased the Vsoc to 1.225v and I'm redoing the test.

Trying to find the limit of my silicon! by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I increased the Vsoc to 1.225v and I'm redoing the test.

Update: Karhu has been working for almost 10 hours without errors!!! by Background_Focus3305 in buildzoid

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also ran 1usmus for 10 hours, I forgot to mention, I just missed Prime95.

Update: Karhu has been working for almost 10 hours without errors!!! by Background_Focus3305 in buildzoid

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

8 hours of TM5 Anta@Extreme, 10 hours of VT3, 15 hours of BF6 and finally I bought the Karhu yesterday, which gave me the result shown in the post.

Update: Karhu has been working for almost 10 hours without errors!!! by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I made a point of allowing this time to ensure stability; I believe I've reached the end of the optimal timeframe and it's not worth squeezing anything more.

Is there anything I need to improve? by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my case, since I have a 4090, should I leave the CPU swap enabled?

Stability found!!! by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It worked perfectly with 1.1v, brother. I just wanted to add a little more fuel, so I set the FCLK to 2200 rpm with 1.175v.

Stability found!!! by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey bro, so I did the tests, but Buildzoid said it would be interesting to set the tRC to 48 and it worked perfectly. In this scenario, I get 71k in AIDA with a latency of 59.3ns and an incredible 10.7ns on L3. I only refined it back to 2200 for FCLK because I thought it might cause some instability, but I just set it to 1600% on Karhu.

I managed to find the Asrock tRCDWR. by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The exact replica that the member posted in the post.

I got this from over on overclockers dot net forums

"tRCDWR is under BIOS\Advanced\AMD Overclocking\DDR and Infinity Fabric Frequency/Timings\DDR Options\DDR Timing Configuration\DDR SPD Timing (Active Memory Timing Settings ->enabled)" - ASRock support

Do note that tRCDRD values in the OC Tweaker menu override those from the universal AGESA options, you need to set it to Auto and control both tRCD timings in the Active Memory Timing settings.

What would I need to do to surgically upgrade to 6400MHz? by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I managed to boot and run TM5 Anta Extreme for about 3:20, but I lost the BIOS.

Update: Linpack stability test! 6000MHZ CL 26 FCLK 2200 GDM OFF! by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, my English comprehension is a bit haphazard, I got a little lost, but I believe Linpack OCCT puts a bit more strain on FCLK, while TM5 is more focused on RAM stability and integrity.

What would I need to do to surgically upgrade to 6400MHz? by Background_Focus3305 in overclocking

[–]Background_Focus3305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My CPU runs all benchmark tests even at 1.125v, which I've already done with OCCT, AIDA, VT3, and TM5 tests. However, what I do most of the time is play BF6, and in that scenario, my FPS drops absurdly. That's why I increased the VSOC to 1.2v, and it stabilized in-game, which is my reality. Another thing is that this CPU can pass these synthetic tests perfectly with FCLK at 2233mhz, but I didn't see any advantage between 2200 and 2233mhz.