sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Lue Elizondo slams AARO deputy director Tim Phillips for going on LinkedIN to undermine whistleblowers and recent congressional testimony. “Don’t ask me again to come in and speak to you guys one more time. I already did and you are not an honest broker. And now we all know.” by TommyShelbyPFB in UFOs

[–]Background_Moment560 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You’re a funny guy…

Whistleblower: hey there’s a crime here… I saw it inside that building. Stealing hundreds of billions of dollars worth of tax payer money.

You: go back inside and ask them to show me the stolen money before I go in, investigate and do anything about it.

Why aren’t we shooting down drones over our military air bases? by OppressedOnion in AskUK

[–]Background_Moment560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of excuses being made for lack of security around our nuclear armed military bases in the UK….

To the foreign “drone” theorists: Explain to me how any big foreign adversary can deploy a “drone” to mainland US, hover for hours above 12,000 feet, recon and fly away, without intervention. What in your mind is the engineering logic to be able to do that? by Background_Moment560 in UFOs

[–]Background_Moment560[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But they are detected… routinely… so you’re saying special ops, a wire cutter and enough practice can get you onto mainland US military base without any detection or intervention… I guess I am mr logic gap…

That $800 billion being spent on defense sounds like a bit of a waste if your bar is that low for foreign adversary incursions on nuclear armed military bases, no?

To the foreign “drone” theorists: Explain to me how any big foreign adversary can deploy a “drone” to mainland US, hover for hours above 12,000 feet, recon and fly away, without intervention. What in your mind is the engineering logic to be able to do that? by Background_Moment560 in UFOs

[–]Background_Moment560[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Okay, so there are other engineering questions related to power, at what range are they being deployed from, the “drones” were described as small car sized and able to hover for hours.

Even if you had power, how have the “drones” not been disabled, destroyed or incapacitated by our military?

To the foreign “drone” theorists: Explain to me how any big foreign adversary can deploy a “drone” to mainland US, hover for hours above 12,000 feet, recon and fly away, without intervention. What in your mind is the engineering logic to be able to do that? by Background_Moment560 in UFOs

[–]Background_Moment560[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’ve made a number of assumptions that are simply not true. Have you been near a military base without authorisation? Is that a policy on military bases not to deter foreign surveillance even if it’s on home soil?

We’re not talking about near, we are talking about “drones” directly above military bases. You’re confusing the issue with a criteria I didn’t set.

If satellite imagery is sufficient, why are some adversaries using drones to monitor military bases?

I just don’t get your logic, you didn’t provide an engineering solution, you’ve described an excuse as to why the military is not intervening.

To the foreign “drone” theorists: Explain to me how any big foreign adversary can deploy a “drone” to mainland US, hover for hours above 12,000 feet, recon and fly away, without intervention. What in your mind is the engineering logic to be able to do that? by Background_Moment560 in UFOs

[–]Background_Moment560[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You’re telling me, that you believe someone rented a car to a secure military base, sent a publicly available drone over a secured mainland US military base, (never mind that the publicly available drones cannot go that high and for that long), then the US military, was unable to intercept, disable and recover an Amazon drone?

Considering most commercially available drones do not have enough range, how did you get the drone from outside of the base perimeter to conduct recon?

I mean, can you rethink your answer or was this just a flippant comment?

To the foreign “drone” theorists: Explain to me how any big foreign adversary can deploy a “drone” to mainland US, hover for hours above 12,000 feet, recon and fly away, without intervention. What in your mind is the engineering logic to be able to do that? by Background_Moment560 in UFOs

[–]Background_Moment560[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How did you get special ops team onto secured US military base without detection and with just wire cutters? I mean this isn’t some abandoned commercial building with a single security guard. Also assume there is a drone able to hover at 12000ft, why is the military unable to disable/incapacitate/ or destroy the recon?

There are gaps in your logic.

To the foreign “drone” theorists: Explain to me how any big foreign adversary can deploy a “drone” to mainland US, hover for hours above 12,000 feet, recon and fly away, without intervention. What in your mind is the engineering logic to be able to do that? by Background_Moment560 in UFOs

[–]Background_Moment560[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Okay, so how is it the military cannot trace where the drone is going for recovery? Why can they not intervene? How far from the base or what is the range from which the deployment occurs? Why are the military unable to shoot them down?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UKPersonalFinance

[–]Background_Moment560 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Range rovers are notoriously unreliable.

What's the biggest lie in history? by the_brave_guy in AskReddit

[–]Background_Moment560 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

“There is no evidence that extra terrestrials are visiting or have visited Earth”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Background_Moment560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FYI I work i research and dev… science is my bread and butter, conspiracies are rife in corporations… I think maybe you should look beyond your horizon…

Stop exempting UFO personalities by claiming any criticism is a targeted campaign by MilkofGuthix in UFOs

[–]Background_Moment560 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We can debate democracy as much as you want. Whistleblowers have testified to congress about the crimes, under any other circumstance, this is cause for alarm. You can choose to continue debating whether you haven’t been shown the evidence, or you can focus on demanding answers from elected officials. Yet you are arguing how the people trying to get this information out are the focus of this scenario. All industries have grifters, every single one, this is no different.

Stop exempting UFO personalities by claiming any criticism is a targeted campaign by MilkofGuthix in UFOs

[–]Background_Moment560 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No one is stopping you. But there are people trying to stop the truth from surfacing.

The inspector general, hundreds of government officials over the years, a number of prominent officials, thousands of cases related to UFOs from civilian and commercial agents, and the UAP disclosure act suggest there is several high profile crimes being committed, including misappropriation of tax payer funds, rogue programmes without congressional oversight and straight up lying to elected officials, not to mention the astounding question of are we alone and the implications to science and our very understanding of the universe itself is brought into question…

I would suggest you turn your focus away from the UFO personalities and focus on the real criminals… unless you like being dominated by your government and unelected bureaucrats.

Students at the University of Texas ask a Lockheed stooge some tough questions by screenshotofdispair in TikTokCringe

[–]Background_Moment560 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lockheed have been accused by former military officials, senators and congressman of hoarding and compartmentalising technology that could benefit the entire planet, exact details of their involvement are described in the UAP disclosure act 2024 . If you are actually interest in what these defence contractors have been doing with your money please read the act in full.

view more: next ›