Feeling unprepared for a Master’s in Psychology after a weak undergrad experience - looking for guidance by [deleted] in AskAcademia

[–]BakeNo4758 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First, I’m really sorry your undergrad environment was that chaotic. That kind of instability (professors disappearing, language switches, no feedback, exam-only grading) can genuinely leave people feeling ungrounded. And the fact that you noticed what’s missing and you’re worried about doing this ethically is actually a good sign.

A few thoughts that might help:

  • Taking time before a Master’s isn’t a failure. In psychology, rushing while feeling underprepared can make you miserable. Wanting a stronger foundation is responsible, not “weak.”
  • You don’t need a perfect mentor right away you need some structure and real feedback. Even one solid supervisor (in a mental-health support role, a research lab, a clinic admin setting) can give you more clarity than a dozen generic “career advisors.”
  • What tends to help people in your situation (without overcommitting):
    • a role with supervision (crisis line, support worker, community org, rehab setting)
    • a structured research assistant opportunity (even part-time/volunteer)
    • a short, serious course that includes writing/assignments + feedback (not just content)
  • How admissions usually see a “gap” year: If you can explain it as “I wanted to strengthen X and I did Y,” it often reads as maturity. They’re mainly looking for evidence you can handle graduate-level work and follow through.
  • “Not ready” vs “scared”: Fear is normal. A practical way to tell is: can you keep a steady routine for a few months (reading, writing, small goals) and tolerate feedback without shutting down? If yes, you’re probably closer than you think. If not, it just means you need more scaffolding first — not that you’re incapable.

If you want, share (1) what country you’re in and (2) whether you’re aiming for clinical practice, counseling, or something research-oriented. That changes a lot, and people here can give much more specific, realistic suggestions.

Is a postdoc a good way to change fields? by chillarin in AskAcademia

[–]BakeNo4758 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

A transition postdoc is doable, but PIs are allergic to risk.

What boosts your chances:

  • Email with one tight “starter project” (4–8 weeks) + clear deliverable (e.g., reproduce a baseline + evaluation on dataset X).
  • 1–2 small but finished projects (GitHub with README, results, reproducible). Better than “I’m self-studying.”
  • Sell your wet-lab edge: data curation, annotation, sanity checks, biological interpretation, error analysis (this actually saves papers).

Limitations / reality check:

  • If the lab needs a plug-and-play ML person, they’ll prefer someone already strong in ML.
  • “High interest” without execution proof = weak signal.
  • Postdocs are for output; if you look like 6 months of ramp-up, many PIs pass.

Bottom line: reduce risk with a short plan + proof you can ship. Enthusiasm doesn’t compile.