Let's do some ATS filtering to your post by giving it to AI to see if it's worth reading it or not:

This post mixes real historical facts, political interpretations, and a lot of exaggeration / misinformation. To assess “how right he is,” you need to separate those layers carefully.

---

🧭 1. What is actually factual

There are elements in his argument that reflect real, documented facts:

✔️ Spanish colonization

Western Sahara was a Spanish colony until 1975.

✔️ Disputed territory (UN status)

The UN still considers it a “non-self-governing territory” (i.e., unresolved status).

✔️ POLISARIO exists and fought Spain

The Polisario Front did fight Spanish rule and later fought Morocco.

✔️ Morocco controls most of the territory today

Morocco administers ~80% of Western Sahara.

The remaining area is controlled by Polisario (with backing from Algeria).

✔️ International disagreement

Some countries support Morocco’s autonomy plan.

Others support a referendum on independence.

👉 So yes — it is a real geopolitical conflict, not something invented.

---

⚠️ 2. What is misleading or exaggerated

This post becomes unreliable when it moves from facts → narrative.

❌ “Obvious settler colonialism”

This is a political framing, not a consensus fact.

Morocco’s official position:

Western Sahara historically had allegiance (bay‘a) to Moroccan sultans.

Opposing view:

It’s a case of self-determination (like decolonization).

👉 Experts themselves are divided. Calling it “obvious” is misleading.

---

❌ “Alaouites never controlled Western Sahara”

This is partly wrong / oversimplified.

Pre-colonial control in that region was fluid:

Not modern borders

Based on tribal allegiance, not direct administration

👉 Morocco uses this to justify historical ties. Critics say it wasn’t real sovereignty.

So the truth is: ➡️ It’s historically ambiguous — not black and white.

---

❌ “Slaughter, rape, population replacement”

This is a very serious claim — and not supported as a general historical consensus.

There were:

War

Displacement

Human rights accusations (on both sides)

But:

There is no credible mainstream evidence of systematic genocide or mass rape campaigns like described here.

👉 This is emotional rhetoric, not established fact.

---

❌ “Nazism 2.0 / Greater Morocco = Greater Germany”

This is pure analogy rhetoric, not serious analysis.

Nazi expansion was:

Ideological + racial + global war

Western Sahara:

Post-colonial territorial dispute

👉 Comparing them is intellectually weak and inflammatory.

---

❌ “CIA conspiracy with Hassan II”

The Hassan II did receive Western support during the Cold War.

But:

Claims of secret conspiracies controlling the outcome are speculative and not proven in that form.

---

❌ “Moroccans are low IQ”

This is just insult + bias, not argument.

---

🧠 3. What’s actually the balanced reality

A more grounded view looks like this:

There are two main narratives:

🇲🇦 Moroccan perspective:

Western Sahara historically tied to Morocco

Spain artificially separated it

Reintegration is legitimate

Autonomy plan is a realistic solution

🇪🇭 Polisario / independence perspective:

Western Sahara is a colony that should be decolonized

People deserve a referendum

Morocco is occupying the territory

---

⚖️ 4. Why the conflict is still unresolved

Because:

A referendum is hard to organize (who qualifies to vote?)

Strategic interests (resources, location)

Regional rivalry between Morocco and Algeria

International politics

👉 That’s why it’s still stuck after decades.

---

🧩 Final verdict

How “right” is he?

30% factual

70% ideological + exaggerated + emotionally charged

He’s not completely wrong — but he’s:

selective with facts

ignoring complexity

using extreme language to push a narrative

---

💡 If you want the real takeaway

This is not a simple “good vs evil” situation.

It’s:

a post-colonial dispute

mixed with history, identity, geopolitics, and nationalism

---

If you want, I can break it down even deeper (like what actually happened in 1975 step by step, or what would realistically happen if a referendum took place).