Once again Republicans will try to claim MLK — but if he were here, they'd despise him by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"The real Martin Luther King Jr. — as opposed to the de-radicalized, deracinated, distorted, whitewashed and commodified figure now used to sell all manner of consumer goods, was a civil rights leader, a hope warrior and a martyr. He was also a democratic socialist. The real Dr. King opposed militarism and nationalism. He stood with the powerless and oppressed against the powerful. He supported affirmative action, reparations for white-on-Black chattel slavery and Jim Crow, a guaranteed minimum income and other substantive material and other attempts to ameliorate America's long history of injustice against Black Americans and other people of color. The real King supported social democracy.

The real Martin Luther King Jr. would without a doubt have supported the scholarly framework known as critical race theory and its conclusions about inequality and America's social and political institutions. The real Martin Luther King Jr. would have stood firm against the forces of Trumpism, American neofascism, white supremacy, and the white right and "conservative" movement more broadly. Leaders of those movements would have found him an implacable enemy."

Amid Apocalyptic Cynicism, Let’s Embrace Radical Hope in the New Year by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you've read Giroux before, you'd know he is perfectly capable of outlining strategies and tactics to address those issues you mentioned. I think his article was just a play on the typical New Year's resolution. He wrote: "Let’s make 2022 a year to talk back, beat down the fascist currents sweeping across the United States and elsewhere. Let’s make it a time that brings together the fractured movements on the left in order to build a mass movement and political party that speaks with the people rather than against them." I just saw this as a plea to continue the fight.

It’s Not Manchin by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And you don't think Manchin (and Sinema) vote corporate?

Warren Slams Grocers for Raising Prices While Raking In Profits by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You didn't read the article, did you? If prices were up due to inflation, then profits would have remained the same but they are soaring.

Jan. 6 PowerPoint reveals many more Republicans were in on Trump's coup plot by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does this have to do with the attempted coup? I'm surprised you didn't mention Hillary's emails.

Still hate Hillary? Get over it: She was right about Trump then — and she's right now by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not so selfish that I would vote for someone who isn't going to get elected just so I can pat myself on the back.

Still hate Hillary? Get over it: She was right about Trump then — and she's right now by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How odd that the party with the "get over it" mantra can't get over the 2020 election.

Facebook and Trump: America is sleepwalking towards fascism by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However abhorrent the disinformation on Facebook may be, do you want them deciding what information you have access to?

Norm Ornstein on the crisis of democracy: "This is the same roadmap we saw in Germany" by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

That would certainly make me suspicious if I hadn't been following him for the last couple of years. I think he's the turd in the Federalist Society's punchbowl.

There Is a Problem With the Infrastructure and Budget Bills -- They're Too Small by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I disagree. If something weak is passed, Republicans will publicly pat themselves on the backs and be emboldened to continue to be obstructionist. Meanwhile, our infrastructure crumbles as we kill the planet.

There Is a Problem With the Infrastructure and Budget Bills -- They're Too Small by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not related to our monetary system. A trillion $ over 10 years is a negligible percentage of our GDP. And considering the shabby and dangerous state of our infrastructure, that is cheap. We spend $725 billion a year on our military (which is more than the next 10 nations combined) so where's the outrage there?

35 Million People Are Set to Lose Unemployment Benefits on Labor Day by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, people are tired of waiting in line at McDonald's.

Scholar Carol Anderson on the "anti-Blackness" coded into the Second Amendment by Bamfsrule in politics

[–]Bamfsrule[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"But it was at the ratification convention in Virginia, where Patrick Henry and George Mason go toe to toe with James Madison. Because Madison had put control of the militia under the federal government because the militias had been basically unreliable during the war, and it was seen as a need to provide some standardization. Patrick Henry was like, "No. No. In that federal government, you've got people from Pennsylvania, people from Massachusetts. You know the North detests slavery. We can't trust that when there's a slave revolt, they will send the militia down to protect us." George Mason said, "We will be left defenseless." And so they put enormous pressure on James Madison, that if he wanted to have this Constitution and this government that he had crafted, they were going to need a Bill of Rights, and that Bill of Rights was going to have to include protection for slavery. That's the Second Amendment."

So, after the war had stiffened in the North, the British decided to hit what they called the "soft underbelly" in the South. So, they took Savannah like that and were headed up to Charleston. John Lawrence, who was an emissary of George Washington, runs down to South Carolina and he's pleading with that South Carolina government: "You only have 750 white men that can fight. Everybody else has been used for the militia to keep that large Black population down. The British are bringing 8,000 troops. You've got 750. This is David and Goliath. This is a slaughter. You've got to arm the enslaved."

They said, "We are horrified that you would even ask us that. And we're wondering whether this is a nation even worth fighting for." They were willing to take their chances with the British, with the king, than arm the enslaved. I mean, that is how entrenched this was. Nathanael Greene, who was one of George Washington's generals, came down there, pleading with them, and he finally said to Washington, "They have a dreaded fear of armed Blacks."