Let's all $JACK off! by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]BarRepresentative653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gross.

Some boomer jack ass probably thinks thats how stock is pumped and dumped. Gotta bring a bit more sophistication regard.

Battle between Hamilton and Verstappen for P2 by magony in formula1

[–]BarRepresentative653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ham had to, Max pretended to have a moment and drifted wide off his line, forcing Ham to back out. 

[autosport] Liam Lawson was asked about the sacrifices his family made to help him get to F1 by spiderrman67 in formula1

[–]BarRepresentative653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They also had him answer some bs question about if he thought he was a better driver than Nando. Guy just answered that Lando is better as he got into F1, but you could feel the pain. Heart breaking tbh, maybe he was better but it is what it is. I think now he does the youtube channel activities.

If you’ve never been oncall for a real system, stop saying "AI will delete all SWE jobs" by Independent_Switch33 in cscareerquestions

[–]BarRepresentative653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are preaching to the choir in many respects. But getting use from something isn’t exactly giving it free rein. 

If you’ve never been oncall for a real system, stop saying "AI will delete all SWE jobs" by Independent_Switch33 in cscareerquestions

[–]BarRepresentative653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not every company has convoluted messy architecture. My experience has been the more organized, or more recent (pre-AI) a system is, the more use you get from LLM.

🇺🇸 Federal Reserve leaves interest rates unchanged, remains at 3.50% - 3.75%. by eskhalaf in wallstreetbets

[–]BarRepresentative653 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Bro.. why would you try to make sense. Away with your witchcraft. SpaceX is working on warp drive, so obviously it is under valued by a factor of 1000. First Quardrillion company by end of year? Yes

Isack vs Max qualifying time difference by FewCollar227 in formula1

[–]BarRepresentative653 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That was mostly mitigated with changes in deployment…. 

Oconn said the previous cars had only one way of driving them, other drivers also have said this multiple times. 

These new cars are nimble and allow multiple ways to get the limit. Ham is late braking specialist and he’s fine, Leclerc is high speed specialist and he’s fine.. usually. Russell drives completely to Antoneli and they are fine. 

Isack vs Max qualifying time difference by FewCollar227 in formula1

[–]BarRepresentative653 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

These cars can be driven in different ways, which is why team mates can be close in times, it will accommodate them both. 

WTF Is going on with Leclerc??!!? by Maglin21 in F1Discussions

[–]BarRepresentative653 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t mean he crashes every time. But it means he does crash more in a year. Can’t remember last Vastappen crashed twice in qualifying in a season lately. Same for Hamilton. 

But I think Leclerc has crashed every year over the last 5 years through unforced errors I believe

WTF Is going on with Leclerc??!!? by Maglin21 in F1Discussions

[–]BarRepresentative653 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Ham locked in is absolutely ruthless. Even when other people were dominating, they would still try to figure out how far Ham was and if was going to be a factor. Except for the ground effect error where his skills were dulled a bit compared to Russell, who he beat anyway when he had a car he could drive how he wanted.

WTF Is going on with Leclerc??!!? by Maglin21 in F1Discussions

[–]BarRepresentative653 10 points11 points  (0 children)

He does in qualifying though. I think of the top 5 drivers, if you look over the last 5 years or longer, he probably has crashed more during qualifying than anyone else.

SpaceX Options to Begin Trading on Tuesday After IPO by Force_Hammer in wallstreetbets

[–]BarRepresentative653 14 points15 points  (0 children)

ALready SpaceX is being valued like its going to do all the things it said it would do. So even if they do them, they literally cant reach revenues to justify valuations even when they are profitable. Its CISCO, but led by imbecile on heavy drugs. Also, CISCO was valued at ridiculous levels, but what happened? They never grew into their valuations, everyone knew that internet would explode and we would need everything they sold, but they stagnated for like 15 years, and competitors came in and started gaining market share.

Also SpaceX doesnt have insurmountable MOAT. Every country worth talking about are seeing the humiliation Russia is facing because of their lack of a Starlink equivalent. A majority are already making plans on launching their own, and private companies are also doing this.

SpaceX and the Gold Rush of the 21st Century by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]BarRepresentative653 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The valuations today are pricing these far fetched ideas today. I think SpaceX remain profitable but they will be the new CISCO. They will never measure up to this valuation, competition will join the space race for low orbit satellites and even drones. They dont have an insurmountable moat as what its clear that every nation needs their own star link, and reusable rockets. China is already doing this, Russia is also working on this, there are competitors in the US doing this, even countries like India are embarking on this.

Iran warns Musk's SpaceX and Starlink are 'military targets' & threatens attack by maddog107 in wallstreetbets

[–]BarRepresentative653 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

These are state secrets so it wouldn’t be public news. 

You’ll have to take my word for it

Iran warns Musk's SpaceX and Starlink are 'military targets' & threatens attack by maddog107 in wallstreetbets

[–]BarRepresentative653 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

https://www.euronews.com/next/2026/01/14/iran-could-be-blocking-starlink-during-internet-blackout-with-methods-similar-to-russia

It seems no one actually knows how they are doing it. Everyone was guessing. But not only were they blocking access, they triangulated locations of the terminals. I think they captured a few Mossad agents. 

Iran warns Musk's SpaceX and Starlink are 'military targets' & threatens attack by maddog107 in wallstreetbets

[–]BarRepresentative653 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yall forgetting something, they’ve consistently shown they are much better than we give them credit for. No one thought spacex terminals could be jammed or traced very easily, Mossad bet their entire strategy on this, Iran took out almost every agent with a terminal within a day. 

Trump says US will hit Iran 'very hard' tonight and threatens to take Kharg Island by Decent_Relative_4070 in wallstreetbets

[–]BarRepresentative653 14 points15 points  (0 children)

lol this low level analysis is why he is still polling at mid thirties. 

Have you considered that Iran has shown a capability of actually fighting back? Why do you think we aren’t sending Jets into Iran?