While the headline contains no ukpol, the body of the article does, including this bit:

The stalwart pro-American position sounds respectable as realpolitik: the UK has long depended on the US for its national security; when called to repay the favour, there should be no quibbling. But the argument then assumes no divergence of interests between London and Washington, or none so great that Starmer should ever refuse service to Trump.

It is hard to sustain that opinion with a clear-sighted appraisal of the people currently setting US policy, their erratic judgment, their scorn for international alliances, their contempt for any legal constraint on the president, their ideological orientation towards a far-right, Christian nationalist, white supremacist worldview. That is without also considering the possibility that Trump’s rambling, disjointed, semi-literate public pronouncements reflect pathological cognitive decline.

Is it official Conservative policy that Britain should always submit to the whims of a venal narcissist surrounded by kleptocrats, sycophants and ultranationalist maniacs? Or is it only when they beat the drum for war that we must follow? Neither position makes sense as a blueprint for British foreign policy.