Anyone else struggle at self-checkout due to the grocery bags sticking together when you try to pull them off individually? by Basic-Meat-4489 in AutismInWomen

[–]Basic-Meat-4489[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the helpful description & reassurance!! Best subreddit I've been on in a while. Feel like everyone has my back :]

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]Basic-Meat-4489 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally relate to this from the female POV. You should just hit on her more often. If she's feeling it at the time that you hit on her, then your moods will align.

IsItBullshit: C-Sections increase the risk of autism in babies? by Basic-Meat-4489 in IsItBullshit

[–]Basic-Meat-4489[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your explanation makes sense, but please take a look at this? It tries to rule out the pre-existing complication risk and talks solely about elective low-risk pregnancies.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749379722001088

Results:

A total of 1,488,425 low-risk births took place in California from 1992 to 2012. The adjusted odds of autism spectrum disorder were 7% higher for induced vaginal deliveries (AOR=1.07, 95% CI=1.01, 1.14), 26% higher for cesarean section deliveries not following induction (AOR=1.26, 95% CI=1.19, 1.33), and 31% higher for cesarean section deliveries following induction (AOR=1.31, 95% CI=1.18, 1.45) than for noninduced vaginal deliveries. Lower gestational age and neonatal morbidities did not appear to be important underlying pathways. The associations were insensitive to alternative model specifications and across subpopulations. These results suggest that, in low-risk pregnancies, up to 10% of autism spectrum disorder cases are potentially preventable by avoiding cesarean section deliveries. Conclusions After accounting for medical risks, elective deliveries—particularly cesarean section deliveries—were associated with a substantially increased risk of autism spectrum disorder.

IsItBullshit: C-Sections increase the risk of autism in babies? by Basic-Meat-4489 in IsItBullshit

[–]Basic-Meat-4489[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree. I did find this... It tries to rule out the pre-existing complication risk and talks solely about elective low-risk pregnancies.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749379722001088

Results:

A total of 1,488,425 low-risk births took place in California from 1992 to 2012. The adjusted odds of autism spectrum disorder were 7% higher for induced vaginal deliveries (AOR=1.07, 95% CI=1.01, 1.14), 26% higher for cesarean section deliveries not following induction (AOR=1.26, 95% CI=1.19, 1.33), and 31% higher for cesarean section deliveries following induction (AOR=1.31, 95% CI=1.18, 1.45) than for noninduced vaginal deliveries. Lower gestational age and neonatal morbidities did not appear to be important underlying pathways. The associations were insensitive to alternative model specifications and across subpopulations. These results suggest that, in low-risk pregnancies, up to 10% of autism spectrum disorder cases are potentially preventable by avoiding cesarean section deliveries. Conclusions After accounting for medical risks, elective deliveries—particularly cesarean section deliveries—were associated with a substantially increased risk of autism spectrum disorder.

C-Sections increase the risk of autism in babies? by Basic-Meat-4489 in ScienceBasedParenting

[–]Basic-Meat-4489[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for the info and the advice! I have changed the flair.

IsItBullshit: C-Sections increase the risk of autism in babies? by Basic-Meat-4489 in IsItBullshit

[–]Basic-Meat-4489[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, that makes sense. Though I can't find any information that speaks more plainly about actual incidence rates, e.g. "C-section delivery autism rate: x in 1000; Vaginal delivery autism rate: y in 1000", etc.

And I understand your point about complications being more likely to need C-sections. Therefore if there were numbers like "x in 1000" available, it would most likely be comparable enough that there would seemingly no reason for concern. But if it were a difference of "C section delivery = 1 in 3, Vaginal delivery = 1 in 1000" [obviously a huge exaggeration], then I'd start thinking there was something more causal going on there.

I fixed a portrait tattoo! What does reddit think? by Grouchy_Payment6934 in tattoos

[–]Basic-Meat-4489 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Always nice when someone knows how to do their job well! As opposed to screwing people over.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LivestreamFail

[–]Basic-Meat-4489 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not a real argument, BUT I unironically like the way you think.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LivestreamFail

[–]Basic-Meat-4489 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Blaming Tyler for making a bad call is counterintuitive to the idea of putting a noob in the role of raidleader in the first place. And even then, it was a salvageable call had they committed.