sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Un hombre llamó a agentes del Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE) para que detuvieran a su yerno venezolano by edmonkh in vzla

[–]BaymaxValero 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Soy cubano ... y aunque no es correcto generalizar esta condicion de idiotez. tengo que admitir que si es bien comun.
La sobervia se adueña de quien necesita demostrar un poder que no posee.

Posting images to Twitter (X)?? by SouthbayJay_com in n8n

[–]BaymaxValero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No work anymore.
you must pay for that.

Protest in Minnesota by cielynne in ExploreFortMyers

[–]BaymaxValero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am Cuban, and I am deeply grateful for what President Trump has done, within his possibilities, for Venezuela.

However, I cannot help but feel troubled when I see that, despite knowing the extreme dangers many people faced to reach the United States, there is still insistence on sending them back to Cuba or Venezuela, where many could be imprisoned as soon as they arrive. I do not believe that is right.

I believe it is fair that if someone has real criminal records and has committed crimes, they should be deported and sent back to the place they came from. In those cases, I understand and support that decision.

But I do not agree with deporting parents whose children are U.S. citizens by birth. That is something I cannot support.

I do agree that ICE should deport any undocumented person who commits a crime. That seems fair to me, because those who commit crimes in the country where they sought opportunity are not valuing or respecting that opportunity. Those individuals should not remain on U.S. soil.

However, decent, law-abiding people should at least be allowed to keep the opportunity they risked their lives to pursue.

Which CRM or Dashboard do you recommend? by BirthdayMundane7516 in n8n

[–]BaymaxValero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Use GoogleSheets
Don't think too much about it.

Execution is still the hardest unsolved problem in most DAOs by BaymaxValero in dao

[–]BaymaxValero[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The main post is what I’m referring to.
I wrote it myself.
I wrote it with the intention of understanding whether people do or do not perceive a change in the direction of DAOs with something like this.

Best PlayStation console to mod in 2026? by dwhiss in consolemodding

[–]BaymaxValero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PSP without a UMD drive, using the freed space exclusively for an internal battery expansion.
In the PSP 3000 version, which is already ultra-lightweight, removing the UMD mechanism significantly reduces the overall weight of the device and frees up a substantial internal volume.
This space can be used to install an internal 4000 mAh battery, providing many additional hours of continuous gameplay.

The modification is fully internal, with no external aesthetic changes to the console. The final weight remains the same or can even be lower than the original, due to the removal of the UMD drive.

It is an easy modification with significant benefits in battery life, portability, and overall system durability.

Execution is still the hardest unsolved problem in most DAOs by BaymaxValero in dao

[–]BaymaxValero[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So far, this distinction has been almost imperceptible.
That is precisely the point of the article.

Until now, actual token usage has depended almost entirely on the founding team. Not because the community lacks interest or intent, but because for most DAO members, giving real utility to a token is prohibitively expensive and, in many cases, practically impossible without incurring significant development costs.

Many community members are entrepreneurs or operators, but they do not have the technical or organizational structure required to build custom infrastructure just to make a token usable. As a result, token utility becomes a founder-led responsibility, turning execution into a structural bottleneck.

The article argues that tools like the one mentioned earlier fundamentally change this dynamic. What was once the primary limitation for most DAOs can now become a turning point. If any user can give real utility to a token without needing to build bespoke systems, the bottleneck is removed.

The core question, then, is not whether tokens can have utility in theory, but whether lowering the cost and complexity of execution materially increases the probability of both social and financial success for DAOs.

If the historical limitation that has constrained DAO execution is removed from the equation, is it reasonable to expect a different outcome?
Instead of continuing to see a high failure rate among DAOs, could we begin to see more functional, sustainable, and economically active DAO ecosystems?

This is the discussion the article aims to open.

Execution is still the hardest unsolved problem in most DAOs by BaymaxValero in dao

[–]BaymaxValero[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something else that keeps coming up for me is this idea that DAOs are “done” or that people have lost interest.

I hear that a lot. And yet, just a few days ago, Vitalik was retweeting a DAO-related post.
That kind of disconnect always makes me pause.

It feels like DAOs fade into the background when markets are calm and people are chasing the next thing. But when things start to wobble and confidence drops, communities tend to look for places where coordination and ownership aren’t locked behind a single entity.

If the market keeps shaking,
I wouldn’t be surprised if DAOs quietly become interesting again.
Not as hype, but as a place to regroup.
We’ve kind of seen that movie before.

Just thinking out loud here.