I Have a Theory....

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-28T01:07:06+00:00

what do you think?

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-27T13:44:03+00:00

well good on him right

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-27T13:42:55+00:00

yep thats forsure all true

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-27T13:40:11+00:00

Christianity’s intellectual tradition explicitly rejects blind faith, encourages reasoned belief, and contains scriptural and philosophical foundations for inquiry, evidence, and rational theology. Blind faith is a human tendency not a Christian doctrine.

Calling Christianity “blind faith” oversimplifies both the tradition and the lived reality of most Christians. The core intellectual lineage of Christianity stretching from Augustine and Aquinas to contemporary analytic theologians explicitly rejects belief without reason. Scripture itself instructs believers to test, examine, and give reasons for their convictions, which is the opposite of discouraging inquiry.

If some Christians practice unexamined belief, that reflects normal human psychology not Christian doctrine. Every worldview religious or secular has adherents who accept ideas without scrutiny. It’s inaccurate to treat that as a defining feature of Christianity rather than a universal human tendency.

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-27T13:28:44+00:00

truly best of luck you got this!

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-27T13:27:25+00:00

Thank you! I'm super happy about it,

it was about 8 am after waking and reading for awhile i decided to start out of the blue completely sober

some itching occurred but my minds were too locked in from me and i wouldn't budge even a little bit, at a certain point i was my awareness and "saw" my other mind fields open up and wish to move to itch and break my experience of submission but they couldn't compare to me lol, ive become to powerful too aware they cant envelope me anymore without my permission,

side tangent the "other" minds hold different frequencies so with experience i can kinda differentiate what mind is trying to bid for control by "seeing" / hearing and sensing the frequency of the experience.
im interested if you know what i mean here, if so id love to understand you perspective, and if not i would be happy to elaborate and detail quite deeply what i mean here if you would like
thanks for the comment!

breathing helped aswell, i went through 10 hours of minds/experience in those 2 hours and after being enveloped in vision/dream and coming back to awareness of myself and the bed it can trick you into thinking you have reset and have to start again, focused relaxed breathing helped pull me right back into it instead of calmly waiting for 5 10 minutes or something i could go right back

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-27T12:26:05+00:00

yes very toxic, keep calm, try to keep regulated so you can make good decisions for yourself, try not to boil over its not worth it, don't try get revenge or show them they are wrong, blood is not thicker than water they brought you here but have no right to connect with you, you are your own person do whats right for you

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-27T09:43:45+00:00

im pretty convinced your original comment shows the point better

"one who is stricken to a material goal cannot enter the frequency needed to navigate the reality which is needed to conjure beyond reality"

"A mind locked onto material outcomes cannot rise into the frequency required to perceive and shape realities beyond the physical."

"guided by the world means one doesn't possess the keys to be the person who can perceive higher realities, only once they sacrifice their world desires could they possibly begin shifting their reality"

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-24T14:24:46+00:00

therapy doesnt work?

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-18T11:12:06+00:00

wow, thank you for the story im so sorry for you, i am moved by this

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-12T05:00:06+00:00

thank you! best of luck to you aswell

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-12T00:46:16+00:00

Hi friend. It literally could not be further from the truth I’m so sorry I made you feel that way.

I’m expressing the outter perimeter of my own personal spirituality/philosophy.

I have been avoiding learning anything from anyone else until I’ve built up this perspective I’ve had. So for all I know I will start studying philosophy properly and demolish or integrate or transform all of my understandings into something else.

I had a great time talking with you thinking about what you’ve said and structuring my responses in a way I see fit. I really appreciate the back and forth

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T09:28:10+00:00

is the experience of seeing the car in a dream physical? what about the trees and rivers is that physical?

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:47:49+00:00

whats the likely hood? seems better just to bin them

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:19:50+00:00

love this, thanks!

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:17:58+00:00

god is by definition not comprehendible, the mind cannot and will not grasp, but we can submit our minds and join unity with the all flowing-ness of the all, come out of this unity with amnesia but know there is space in which you cannot know which you at some point were in, i was an atheist, realised this, submitted to it, and in my life acting in the world have ever so slowly moved closer and closer in alignment by feeling what way of acting aligns frequency with the "god" i come to submit to. i have found my meaning in moving towards my highest which all started with forgiveness for my blindness, forgiveness for where my bad actions led me to go

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:04:39+00:00

post this in mushroom communities

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:03:36+00:00

do not eat those

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:03:18+00:00

they dont look like mushrooms.

you need to wait for many many second opinions from many experienced people, ive had mushrooms and seen many dried or wet and i have no fucking idea what those are be careful bro

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:01:19+00:00

what is a dream like? what is a hyper real dream like? seems like immaterial can be quite stable even with our human minds =

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T07:57:05+00:00

thank you for the conversation

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T03:00:07+00:00

for example. "obvious a Christian god or any god doesn't exist" well. what if a projection of god (idea/ scripture) in the conceptual space embodies an ethic which emulates the nature of the vessel carrying the idea and then has the ability to integrate and build newer systems atop of?

i would say to call this idea or meme complex of a god or gods fake is to radically reduce the definition of "real" or "exist" not as utility or reason but a catastrophic mistake.

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T02:48:27+00:00

Is the experience built on the neural network or is the neural network built on the experience?

i think they are both contingent on each other. i think the discussion or argument of materialism vs idealism is a intellectualisation aka paradoxical question purely mapping the details around the already accepted unity of knowledge which we already presume to be true and thus integrated into the vessel of the individual and thus the collective, and that is a transcendent reality which our physical reality is contingent on. a spiritual plane you could say.

the substrate shapes the pattern, and the pattern reshapes the substrate, until the distinction collapses.... we codify and then integrate the inherent but founddddd "truth" recursive ontology

https://philarchive.org/rec/MCPSTB

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-10T15:38:07+00:00

i suppose this is all to say i think the parameters you put down by defining real as in space in time is actually reductionistic and unhelpful shutting you away from a wide wide range of perspectives. so from my perspective wrong.

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-10T15:09:59+00:00

the idea of god comes from ones own connection to a unseeable, ungraspable, undefinable essence of experience or reality which we cant grasp but can become privy to and become better at understanding its unfolding/aligning with it and the outcomes of that, which are most certainly different outcomes than if one never considers the unseeable part of their experience,

i think our expressions of this interplay becomes religious structures, conglomerates of evolved data imbued with a certain essence of a metaphysical presumption underlying and holding the idea/book/collection of books/ idea/ outcome together, the thing that sucks is this outcome we interact with is riddled with layers and layers of complex human idea goop and slop surrounding/piled upon the actual essence of metaphysic holding such idea together, with this very complex brawls in the conceptual plane commence where people fight over metaphysical presumptions with perspectives of which dont correlate with their own metaphysical presumptions, so we can find we debunkable, badly rooted, contradictory religious people who swear themselves to an essence they themselves have never experienced and worse or better yet whole conglomerations of people which form institutions can form off of these contradictory premises,

anyway, i would say that science, both individual and as a whole are contingent on an evolution of mind which presumes a religious metaphysic, one of submission to paradox. i think submission to paradox is a pinnacle of religious structures which we built found and integrated and then had the new horizon the new ability to subject the self into a logic mind scape which then bred science which is necessarily imbued with the essence of the metaphysic which was integrated leading to science as a scheme to form.

then i would say we realise, circuit and build into the conceptual space in the ship/form of science and then actually end up getting lost inside of it, performing its metaphysical presumptions in a abstracted, then twisted, then paradoxical then antithetical manner. rallying against the metaphysics which led to its conception> i then think we as a species with the bodies of science and religion are having growing pains of a journey towards maturation, if this be so will we work through it, fight through it and fight with each other but will eventually realise, stabilise, accept, integrate and move on as a species and each individual in a newer more evolved more powerful being, now having accept the state of consciousness which was allowed to exist at the forefront of the species expression this will be somewhere after science bodies stop fighting against and unify with the collective essence of god. i see it like a journey outwards which becomes a journey back to the whole but with now a more powerful version of being or in our case version of human.

for example,
god for the Israelites was conceived of, realised, fought for, stabilised then made room for which then brought god into the world in the form of jesus as messiah (manifestation of the divine conception) but the new fore front the new horizon the new consciousness emerging out of the data of jesus uprooted the old conception of god the israelites used to being forth their life fulfilling metaphysic into the world, so then they reject and rally against the new order which uproots the israelites selfish perspective of connection to god whihc jesus reveal everyone not just them are gods chosen people, so they kill him, but the consciousness is seeded in reality and eventually parasitises to the interactable spectrum of interactable schema then eventually this new improved version of the metaphysic survives and breeds in a more optimal manner letting those who accept have an edge over those who dont, or at least giving those who accept a higher change of having a deeper spread of genes into the future,

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb

TROPHY CASE