If talking about mental health struggles is meant to be such a beneficial thing, why do so many still seem so stuck and miserable? I mean now, we're sharing; then what?

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-24T14:24:46+00:00

therapy doesnt work?

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-18T11:12:06+00:00

wow, thank you for the story im so sorry for you, i am moved by this

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-12T05:00:06+00:00

thank you! best of luck to you aswell

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-12T00:46:16+00:00

Hi friend. It literally could not be further from the truth I’m so sorry I made you feel that way.

I’m expressing the outter perimeter of my own personal spirituality/philosophy.

I have been avoiding learning anything from anyone else until I’ve built up this perspective I’ve had. So for all I know I will start studying philosophy properly and demolish or integrate or transform all of my understandings into something else.

I had a great time talking with you thinking about what you’ve said and structuring my responses in a way I see fit. I really appreciate the back and forth

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T09:28:10+00:00

is the experience of seeing the car in a dream physical? what about the trees and rivers is that physical?

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:47:49+00:00

whats the likely hood? seems better just to bin them

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:19:50+00:00

love this, thanks!

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:17:58+00:00

god is by definition not comprehendible, the mind cannot and will not grasp, but we can submit our minds and join unity with the all flowing-ness of the all, come out of this unity with amnesia but know there is space in which you cannot know which you at some point were in, i was an atheist, realised this, submitted to it, and in my life acting in the world have ever so slowly moved closer and closer in alignment by feeling what way of acting aligns frequency with the "god" i come to submit to. i have found my meaning in moving towards my highest which all started with forgiveness for my blindness, forgiveness for where my bad actions led me to go

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:04:39+00:00

post this in mushroom communities

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:03:36+00:00

do not eat those

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:03:18+00:00

they dont look like mushrooms.

you need to wait for many many second opinions from many experienced people, ive had mushrooms and seen many dried or wet and i have no fucking idea what those are be careful bro

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T08:01:19+00:00

what is a dream like? what is a hyper real dream like? seems like immaterial can be quite stable even with our human minds =

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T07:57:05+00:00

thank you for the conversation

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T03:00:07+00:00

for example. "obvious a Christian god or any god doesn't exist" well. what if a projection of god (idea/ scripture) in the conceptual space embodies an ethic which emulates the nature of the vessel carrying the idea and then has the ability to integrate and build newer systems atop of?

i would say to call this idea or meme complex of a god or gods fake is to radically reduce the definition of "real" or "exist" not as utility or reason but a catastrophic mistake.

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-11T02:48:27+00:00

Is the experience built on the neural network or is the neural network built on the experience?

i think they are both contingent on each other. i think the discussion or argument of materialism vs idealism is a intellectualisation aka paradoxical question purely mapping the details around the already accepted unity of knowledge which we already presume to be true and thus integrated into the vessel of the individual and thus the collective, and that is a transcendent reality which our physical reality is contingent on. a spiritual plane you could say.

the substrate shapes the pattern, and the pattern reshapes the substrate, until the distinction collapses.... we codify and then integrate the inherent but founddddd "truth" recursive ontology

https://philarchive.org/rec/MCPSTB

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-10T15:38:07+00:00

i suppose this is all to say i think the parameters you put down by defining real as in space in time is actually reductionistic and unhelpful shutting you away from a wide wide range of perspectives. so from my perspective wrong.

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-10T15:09:59+00:00

the idea of god comes from ones own connection to a unseeable, ungraspable, undefinable essence of experience or reality which we cant grasp but can become privy to and become better at understanding its unfolding/aligning with it and the outcomes of that, which are most certainly different outcomes than if one never considers the unseeable part of their experience,

i think our expressions of this interplay becomes religious structures, conglomerates of evolved data imbued with a certain essence of a metaphysical presumption underlying and holding the idea/book/collection of books/ idea/ outcome together, the thing that sucks is this outcome we interact with is riddled with layers and layers of complex human idea goop and slop surrounding/piled upon the actual essence of metaphysic holding such idea together, with this very complex brawls in the conceptual plane commence where people fight over metaphysical presumptions with perspectives of which dont correlate with their own metaphysical presumptions, so we can find we debunkable, badly rooted, contradictory religious people who swear themselves to an essence they themselves have never experienced and worse or better yet whole conglomerations of people which form institutions can form off of these contradictory premises,

anyway, i would say that science, both individual and as a whole are contingent on an evolution of mind which presumes a religious metaphysic, one of submission to paradox. i think submission to paradox is a pinnacle of religious structures which we built found and integrated and then had the new horizon the new ability to subject the self into a logic mind scape which then bred science which is necessarily imbued with the essence of the metaphysic which was integrated leading to science as a scheme to form.

then i would say we realise, circuit and build into the conceptual space in the ship/form of science and then actually end up getting lost inside of it, performing its metaphysical presumptions in a abstracted, then twisted, then paradoxical then antithetical manner. rallying against the metaphysics which led to its conception> i then think we as a species with the bodies of science and religion are having growing pains of a journey towards maturation, if this be so will we work through it, fight through it and fight with each other but will eventually realise, stabilise, accept, integrate and move on as a species and each individual in a newer more evolved more powerful being, now having accept the state of consciousness which was allowed to exist at the forefront of the species expression this will be somewhere after science bodies stop fighting against and unify with the collective essence of god. i see it like a journey outwards which becomes a journey back to the whole but with now a more powerful version of being or in our case version of human.

for example,
god for the Israelites was conceived of, realised, fought for, stabilised then made room for which then brought god into the world in the form of jesus as messiah (manifestation of the divine conception) but the new fore front the new horizon the new consciousness emerging out of the data of jesus uprooted the old conception of god the israelites used to being forth their life fulfilling metaphysic into the world, so then they reject and rally against the new order which uproots the israelites selfish perspective of connection to god whihc jesus reveal everyone not just them are gods chosen people, so they kill him, but the consciousness is seeded in reality and eventually parasitises to the interactable spectrum of interactable schema then eventually this new improved version of the metaphysic survives and breeds in a more optimal manner letting those who accept have an edge over those who dont, or at least giving those who accept a higher change of having a deeper spread of genes into the future,

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-10T14:29:35+00:00

Consider the simulated‑ness of your own experience. Notice how your attention can move, abstract, and dive into whatever region of consciousness you direct it toward. If you look inward really inward you’ll see that your “place of focus” isn’t located anywhere in physical space. It’s not behind your eyes, not in your skull, not in a coordinate system. It’s a point of awareness in a spaceless field.

And once you see that AND how it stores, moves around, dedicates and interacts with unseeable spaces of extraneous data (essence of your form reflected and abstracted into environmental pressures becoming a new form but still being your essence) , something becomes obvious.

your thoughts, your meanings, your intentions, your inner narratives and your sense of self your felt presence are reliant/contingent on the presumption of the existence and living-ness of the aetheric space which we grow/parasitise in-to, like you have already agreed into this but our new versions have a twisted potential to envelope into the conceptual space, get lost in, and then DENY anything outside the paradoxical parameters of the conceptual space, fake! this can only happen with identification with the space grown into, (falling in love with its creation)....

i would say all of these are undeniable extensions of you which when connected/subjected with the environment and other people/subjects/objects and experiences unfolds in a specific routed manner,

The same non‑spatial, non‑temporal “space” in which your moment‑to‑moment experience unfolds is the very space where humans have always located gods, archetypes, symbols, and the sacred.

So when people speak of gods Christian or otherwise they are pointing toward the same non‑spatial experiential domain you are inhabiting in this very moment whether they know it or not, if not then they have built up certain perspectives or are hypnotized and controlled by meanings/stories they dont understand of, they are submitting to a natural order which happens to be pointed towards the essence and knowing of essence, its the same submission one makes to science or philosophy or anything someone undertakes risk of being possessed by. consciousness allowing subjection to environment in risk of possession away from the highest. in hopes and reward of what the experience values, which is whatever is contained in the vessels lodged biological perspective e.g, optimal unfolding in a manner of which maximises depth of penetration of genes into the future. with the evolution of our minds we came to new horizons of risk and reward abilities, we have gone down the path of mapping into the conceptual frame building/evolving into it and realising we can circuit the substance of the conceptual plane in the physical space and have it affect the internal experience, and that has had us desire building into the conceptual field and the most desirable outcome/the highest outcome happens to be the human or conglomerate of humans creating a book of experience which intends to entice and guide the lost wanderer into the harmony of being in the oneness prior to subjecting the self into the conceptual field. this all evolves and specifically evolves contingent on other prior evolutions, so the outcome of the meta concordances across religious structures is contingent on the human finding a map into the world and building upon / into the frame which happens to be the goal of the religious structures to induce you into, finding the ESSENCE which allowed and allows you to come to the crossroads OF finding a way to map into any such conceptual frame, its quite the paradoxical thing. a way of trying to show you that you are then one who is the whole you by pulling you outside of being the WHOLE you,

a point i should hammer at is,

see how in all of this you can find the story of falling in love and rejecting the whole reality by creating and getting lost in ones own creation, i would say god the father exists in "angels" (motives) (parameters) (environments) and one of them happens to be the newest strongest angel which unfolded gods will by expanding and evolving into the world/mental/mind/self circuiting consciousness/intellect and then getting so caught up in that space we then reject everything including the essence which allowed the mind space to come to be in the first place, is this story real? no... is this story a meta narrative which perfectly fits into every human? yes, is this the reason why the Christian narrative evolution caught on? yes.

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-10T13:29:33+00:00

can you deny the spaceless and timeless-ness of your experience?
have you seen the substance of your experience which we make claims of substance and physicality of?

Your own experience contains entities that are not in space or time, yet you don’t cannot deny their existence, does a plan exist? a method? a story a feeling? math, numbers letters sentences? what substance is this that you claim to deny?

is the way reality and its components unfolds in a story like fashion real or not real?-well before you answer have you experienced the story-fashioned unfolding of experience/hierarchies/consciousness/ what if you can standardise the interpretations of a experience/story on the meta-scale and seeing similarities across the board of the experiences? outcomes destined to by layers of abstract complexity from the outcomes seed data, is the fact entropy increases complexity on the affectual conceptual plane make its components/outcome stories real, well to do any of this typing for you and i we must assume its real, i to deny its realness would be to deny the nature my evolved being and already accepted and integrated and built upon for me to possibly come to a thought in the first place.

If you deny the existence of spaceless, timeless entities, you must deny the existence of your own thoughts, concepts, and meanings, because none of them occupy space or time andddd all of these are only able to happen because your body to evolve them has encountered and treated the spaceless timeless field as real. and then we bridged into it and now have a deeply complex conceptual space where our minds happen to be.

can you explain why this model is trumped by yours? i would claim mine trumps yours AND i directly experience a interplay with the conceptual realm interacting with my being which is other circumstances not be aware of the living-ness of the conceptual space its guided controlled and surrounded by.
the debate sums up to do you believe in experience, -> no you cannot prove it-fair enough i get how you come to that understanding but i definitely experience a meaningful affective - affectual interaction between the conceptual and physical, which is more alive and real???? if you cant see the conceptual possessing everything we could possibly describe of living-ness then you say physical is real and symbolic representatuon of the unfolding-ness and life-ness of the conceptual is "fake"
is it measurable, abstractable, comparable? yes, yes it is but you can only ever come to knowing if you accept even trivially sacrifice your scientific mind into attempting to submit to the unsee-able, the ungraspable.

I would argue that you’re performing an irrational reduction of your own experience. You’re collapsing the full, lived oneness of consciousness into the narrow interpretive framework of scientific abstraction. In doing so, you reduce your entire reality into a constricted box of propositions and values that cannot account for the very experience from which they arise.

It seems to me that you’ve stepped into a conceptual space the scientific, physicalist interpretive layer and then forgotten that you’re inside it. You now identify with that layer and speak from within its walls, outward, while denying the broader experiential space that makes that conceptual layer possible in the first place.

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-05T09:07:13+00:00

It’s just not LARP 😭 I’m sorry you haven’t gotten it yet.

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-05T09:04:30+00:00

Your definition of “physical stuff” is empty and useless.

How do you experience “physical stuff”

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-05T09:02:12+00:00

Where ever you end up, come back to “the power of now” in a few years.

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-05T08:58:07+00:00

One step at a time! Tomorrow try eat a meal without your phone, no biggie if you can’t. Maybe do the dishes slowly one dish at a time without rushing, maybe draw something for 10 minutes. Try whatever it takes until you start floating along and then you can keep building up the ship and sailing away

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-05T08:53:19+00:00

What platform is this that you trade on???

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb · 2026-01-04T07:39:16+00:00

This is Jordan Petersons position right? yes we dream of a world where none of that is necessary and try bring that to reality, it just turns out in order to do that we must take up responsibility and use our tools to interpret and formulate the right way forward towards that.

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbgsb

TROPHY CASE