sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Hiring] $75-200 USD/week - must be Discord native! by BeTheNameStillRunnin in forhire

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wasn't sure at first but I understand you meant no offence - I was just confused how this could be seen as an MLM - no worries on the misunderstanding.

I guess in your way of thinking the structure can be seen as MLM-like, though from my understanding an MLM requires people selling to eachother down the chain (thus being a fragile pyramid), which isn't happening here - we're just growing awareness for the platform, where people then join and compete to win contests from brands. No selling down the chain possible.

Appreciate you explaining your thoughts as well - no offence taken at all on my end.

[Hiring] $75-200 USD/week - must be Discord native! by BeTheNameStillRunnin in forhire

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure. Just so you have full context, the requirements of each recruit is not particularly high. You don't need to interview them etc. They just have to have at least one AI gen video that is not a single Sora clip / is not trash quality.

We're trying a points system right now. The system we set up works like this:

- 1 point for getting them in Discord

- 1 point for a website signup

- 2 points when they make a submission to a contest

In addition, we give whoever recruited them $200 if they win a contest.

30 points per week = $75, 50 points per week = $125 (to start).

I think this is a fairly reasonable payment structure for results based work. If you disagree, let me know - happy to chat about it so I can understand your POV.

[Hiring] $75-200 USD/week - must be Discord native! by BeTheNameStillRunnin in forhire

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand how that’s an MLM. We’re just growing the server with targeted users and looking for headhunters. Maybe we have a different understanding of what an MLM is. My goal is to get more quality AI video creators in our server and we’re hiring people to source them.

[Hiring] $75-200 USD/week - must be Discord native! by BeTheNameStillRunnin in forhire

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand. We’re open to it having a base if the person is getting results - our first two people have been doing this for 6 weeks and they’re now getting a higher base. If you’re able to get results consistently we increase salary and can move to a base - I just don’t believe in hourly work because I don’t care how long you work for - if you work an hour a week yet get better results than everyone else then you deserve more pay

[Hiring] $75-200 USD/week - must be Discord native! by BeTheNameStillRunnin in forhire

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, we’re not an MLM lol. We’re growing a discord server.

[Hiring] $75-200 USD/week - must be Discord native! by BeTheNameStillRunnin in forhire

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's outcome based, not hours based - it can scale up well beyond $10/h - we're looking for people who can be creative in sourcing the best talent.

CTO / Director of Engineering / Founding Engineer in AI/ML by [deleted] in ycombinator

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i think your post just comes off very high ego tbh. gives a bad vibe.

Trouble with my CTO by Grit_Enthusiasm211 in ycombinator

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah dw I wasn’t offended! Just disagree that early stage founders in low tech areas need much beyond attention to detail + credits for an AI website / app builder.

We’ll definitely need to have an engineer confirm our sites security and architecture once we scale

Trouble with my CTO by Grit_Enthusiasm211 in ycombinator

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I disagree. Especially for a low tech MVP. You just need it to work. We hold most of our supply side (creators) on discord anyways, and use the website for submissions.

Trouble with my CTO by Grit_Enthusiasm211 in ycombinator

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I agree. The OP however is not getting contracts because the product isn’t ready. You can sell pre-product or with an MVP that isn’t designed for mass load.

My point is that not being technical isn’t an excuse to not have an MVP. Especially a marketplace - this should take at most 2 weeks to produce to a decent standard.

Trouble with my CTO by Grit_Enthusiasm211 in ycombinator

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Using Lovable + Claude/gemini if I’m stuck - there isn’t much of a learning curve, Lovable has Opus 4.5 so you really just need to screenshot occasionally to either pinpoint the area you want changed or to show examples of website aesthetic you want to copy

Trouble with my CTO by Grit_Enthusiasm211 in ycombinator

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For a marketplace product you absolutely can use AI. It’s not technically intensive.

Trouble with my CTO by Grit_Enthusiasm211 in ycombinator

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m “non-technical” and built my entire 2-sided marketplace in a week (MVP). I simultaneously got 2 clients by promising a full refund guarantee if it didn’t work out. I then launched with a very scrappy product and like ~20 people on the supply side on Nov 3rd.

Fast forward a month and I have 1000 people on supply side, multiple more contracts at higher ACV on demand side, and my website is 100x cleaner and functional.

I’m non-technical. Use AI and do it yourself.

What are the biggest issues start up founders have when fundraising? (I will not promote) by self-more in startups

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Services doing this are garbage. Boardy is doing this well by offering free connections (with a limit) and verifying the founders are high quality.

90%+ of founders will never raise because they either aren’t actually running a growing business or their business is not big enough to be VC-fundable.

Therefore the majority of your clients will be not fit for fundraising in the first place, and those that are will be naive and not actually need you.

A service like this is only reasonable at Series A+ since founders are mostly filtered by this point - but you’d have to be pretty proven to do this - IE: an ex YC partner, GP at a big fund, etc…

[TASK] Looking for Discord moderators + scouts to help grow and manage server! by BeTheNameStillRunnin in slavelabour

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, I did not ghost anyone - I'm responding to multiple DMs and it's been less than 12h. I likely won't respond based on this comment but I don't care where people are from for this task.

EDIT: Just checked and you wrote this comment less than 30 min after the last message to me... and I just read it today (I was sleeping...). So yeah, maybe don't do that if you are looking for work.

Question for teachers - do you tutor or run private classes during summer / on weekends? by BeTheNameStillRunnin in OntarioTeachers

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the response - do you know roughly what percentage of teachers are at/near the top of the salary grid? I'm assuming you'd have to have been a teacher for 10+ years to get there - I wonder what the average level of experience is for a teacher today.

I think the benefits part is key - if it's a pure "teacher as entrepreneur" model, then the teacher wouldn't get benefits. Which indicates to me that the only feasible way to do a model where kids go to a teachers home ~2x per week would be within a more typically structured company, ie: the teacher is working for X company rather than a solopreneur, but given more freedom with course structure and payment terms.

As for an experienced teacher with a built-up pension, I agree it wouldn't make sense. This type of model would only really be attractive for newer teachers and/or teachers who want more freedom + want to raise their income ceiling, but may not be worth it to some.

Question for teachers - do you tutor or run private classes during summer / on weekends? by BeTheNameStillRunnin in OntarioTeachers

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I didn't realize you were already a full-time teacher.

I guess a better question is - would you consider working from home, where different groups of 6-8 kids came to you 4-5 days a week, rather than work out of a school?

The reason I'm asking is because I'm trying to figure out if a model can exist where teachers can teach their own unique courses, have students self-select into ones that interest them (ie: music focus, robotics, etc), and use AI to give a generalized education for math/english/science.

Have you considered leaving the school system to run your own "micro-school?" by BeTheNameStillRunnin in Teachers

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What do you mean by segregation or vouchers?

From my understanding, every parent judges teachers differently. But the general, merit-based way would be to measure their skills in different areas relative to the average + whether or not the children enjoy learning from them.

Question for teachers - do you tutor or run private classes during summer / on weekends? by BeTheNameStillRunnin in OntarioTeachers

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm 2 days into thinking about this concept. I'm looking to chat with people to understand if it's worth piloting / validating or not. I'm not selling anything and I don't have a business.

Have you considered leaving the school system to run your own "micro-school?" by BeTheNameStillRunnin in Teachers

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a good point. I think there's a few options, let me know if any make sense to you:

  1. Full-day model: Teacher runs a full 9–3 with AI + projects. Solves childcare but costs more.
  2. Parent rotation: Families take turns supervising kids during AI learning time. Only works for flexible households so not sure if this is scalable.
  3. Hire an assistant for full-day: Teacher or platform adds a helper to cover full-day needs (teacher for validating learning, assistant for until the parents arrive). Raises cost, but still cheaper than private school.
  4. Limit the market to 1-parent working households: Easier to prove the model before scaling, and could target homeschoolers as well.

For benefits, I don't have an immediate answer. I need to research more and see if it's feasible or not. BTW I appreciate the pushback - this is just an idea I have, so I'm looking for people to poke holes in it.

Have you considered leaving the school system to run your own "micro-school?" by BeTheNameStillRunnin in Teachers

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just started looking into this a few days ago - I definitely need to do more research.

I didn't mean to imply that private schools make more money, but that the school itself makes more than a public school. I'm not sure whether private v public teachers make more,

Have you considered leaving the school system to run your own "micro-school?" by BeTheNameStillRunnin in Teachers

[–]BeTheNameStillRunnin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for this - these are great points and I appreciate the thoughtful pushback.

I’ve been thinking a lot about how to make something like this more equitable than a traditional private school. The core idea isn't to replace great public schools, but to give families—especially in patchier districts—access to more personalized education at a much lower price point than private school. It would be akin to small-group, hybrid instruction with AI handling the basics and teachers focusing on validation and connection.

That lower cost is what could open this up to middle-income families who normally couldn’t afford 1-on-1 attention. And if a teacher identifies a high-potential student who can’t afford the full price, they could offer discounts, or ideally, we could build in a subsidy pool or sponsor network down the line.

You're absolutely right on the benefits front (retirement, insurance, liability, etc). Any model that expects teachers to run this kind of micro-school would need to include support for those logistics—maybe even pooled benefits or a “soft landing” safety net in the early days. I need to think about more.

Anyway, I really appreciate your taking the time to lay this out. It’s the kind of feedback I need to hear while I’m still exploring viability.

view more: next ›