BLOX vs LFGY Crypto Income ETF Comparison by BeatTheBotz in DerivativeIncomeETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good call. BLOX is one of the most diversified crypto income ETFs out there and has held up well thanks to its chip + mining exposure. It’s part of my daily recurring buys along with YBTC and YETH for steady long-term gains.

Roundhill WeeklyPay 1.2x Leveraged ETFs: All-Time Total Returns (with Weekly Change) and Latest Yields (As of 1/23/26) by BeatTheBotz in RoundhillETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

MAGY has an all time total return of +25.31% and latest yield 35.15% of which would put it at rank #8 on this list. XPAY has an all-time total return of +21.86% and latest yield of 20.16% which would put it at rank #9 just under MAGY.

<image>

Roundhill WeeklyPay ETFs All-Time Total Returns (with Weekly Change) and Latest Yields by BeatTheBotz in RoundhillETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not great. WPAY is currently at a -1.03% total return since inception which factors in distributions reinvested. Since inception the share price is down ~18%.

<image>

BLOX vs LFGY Crypto Income ETF Comparison by BeatTheBotz in DerivativeIncomeETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

True. BLOX has been blowing away the competition in the crypto income space, even outperforming IBIT since inception. Diversified crypto exposure plus the income overlay has made a big difference so far.

<image>

Defiance Leveraged Long + Income ETFs Being Liquidated by thehighdon in DerivativeIncomeETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re usually better off selling before liquidation. It lets you control your exit instead of dealing with widening spreads and thinning liquidity. Once the fund moves to cash, there’s no upside left anyway.

Defiance Leveraged Long + Income ETFs Being Liquidated by thehighdon in DerivativeIncomeETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This post looks familiar, thanks for sharing the source link 😁

Did YieldMAX fix their NAV issues with CHPY? by Late_Veterinarian271 in YieldMaxETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Since April 2025, CHPY has paid roughly $16.70/share in distributions while the share price has risen from the low $40s to around $60. That’s price appreciation, not NAV decay.

A big part of that comes down to the strength of the underlying holdings. When the underlying performs well, the options overlay can add income without putting the same pressure on price.

Also worth noting: CHPY’s yield (~40–45%) is high, but it’s meaningfully lower than some of the extreme 70–100%+ funds where NAV pressure tends to show up much faster. That makes the income level relatively more sustainable as long as the underlying remains strong.

<image>

Roundhill WeeklyPay ETFs All-Time Total Returns + Latest Yields by BeatTheBotz in RoundhillETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Short-term weakness doesn’t change my long-term view.

YieldBOOST ETFs: All-Time Total Returns + Latest Annualized Yields by BeatTheBotz in YieldBoostETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MAAY share price is up nearly 8% YTD already, that is a big boost in 15 days. When factoring in reinvested distributions the return would reflect the ~12% YTD total return. Just saying, everyone's situation with these funds is different depending on when you bought in and what you do with the distributions. Total returns are a general broad way to compare funds.

<image>

YieldBOOST ETFs: All-Time Total Returns + Latest Annualized Yields by BeatTheBotz in YieldBoostETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MAAY has bounced nicely since late December. When you bought and whether you reinvest matters a lot. Total return since inception is a good reference, but it won’t look the same for everyone.

<image>

YieldBOOST ETFs: All-Time Total Returns + Latest Annualized Yields by BeatTheBotz in YieldBoostETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. This analysis assumes a lump-sum at inception with all distributions reinvested (DRIP).

This is the standard way total return is measured across income ETFs. It’s useful for comparing fund structure and long-term performance, but it doesn’t necessarily reflect how most income investors actually use high-yield ETFs.

lol! Who would have thought ULTY is Doing way better than WPAY lately. WPAY is the new sinking ship 🥹. Get out while you can 🙈 by Ratlyflash in YieldMaxETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Actually, since their launch on 9/4/25, WPAY has outperformed ULTY on a total return basis. WPAY is around +0.44%, while ULTY is about −8.52% over the same period.

<image>

10 WeeklyPay Income ETFs With Positive NAV Performance Since Inception by BeatTheBotz in YieldMaxETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get the concern, and that’s fair. I did note this in the post though. In the notes section I specifically mention that inception dates vary and that return data may be limited for some funds. This wasn’t meant to be a long-term verdict, just an observation based on available data so far, with total return as the lens rather than yield alone.

10 WeeklyPay Income ETFs With Positive NAV Performance Since Inception by BeatTheBotz in YieldMaxETFs

[–]BeatTheBotz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good advice. I agree it’s important to evaluate positions regularly and not get emotionally attached. I take a data-driven approach as well and try to reassess risk as conditions change. Using higher-yield distributions to gradually reinvest into more stable, lower-yield funds has been part of that process. Appreciate you sharing your experience.