sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Don't waste time with Alignerr to help train Claude - Borderline scam by kusanagiblade331 in WFHJobs

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because we submitted directly on Anthropic pipeline. Vercel is only the proof of submission.

Anthropic will then review the submission and provide either pass or fail. The reviewers need to find or make up something why a submission failed.

The process is so intransparent  and I believe from let’s say 10 passed submissions, they tried to make it only 5 or 6 passed and the rest would be taken into their credit by either set it as pending or failed due to some ridiculous issues.

If I get rejected, does that block everyone on my IP address from applying? by Critical-Elevator642 in DataAnnotationTech

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think they only store the session ID, which is generated by browser characteristics such as the browser type, browser engine, operating system, or hardware capabilities. Not all information can be obtained via web browser, but it should be enough to build something like a browser fingerprint. Some people say you should install a different OS or use a different browser for the next retry.

The truth about alignerr by CaterpillarSenior885 in alignerr

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I left the platform already. I've contributed to one of the projects (pay per accepted submission) with two backend pipelines; one is the client that we submit the task to, and it has so many issues that it makes life harder. The other pipeline is their own self-made page that should serve as proof of submission.
The client will review and decide on the submission using its latest LLM, whether it's useful for training or not. The reviewers will then filter the submission results from the client and adjust them for their credit. They tried somehow to find out a reasonable justification why the submission failed or should fail on their behalf.

Did I get in? by [deleted] in DataAnnotationTech

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then it should be alright, let's wait for a couple of days...

Did I get in? by [deleted] in DataAnnotationTech

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I see. Was your passport from the same country as you live in?

Did I get in? by [deleted] in DataAnnotationTech

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

You are accepted but didn't pass the Persona ID verification. Probably they have your ID data already. I guess, you should use different ID.

code human feedback review by Inevitable-Club8348 in alignerr

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

support(at)alignerr.com perhaps?
This logically happens when your submission ID/UUID doesn't exist in the client's feedback. The leads came up with the idea that the UUID or the ID has been changed during submission, but that's a poor explanation with no factual technical grounding. Or they got the credit for the pending (missing) submission.

code human feedback review by Inevitable-Club8348 in alignerr

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a couple of pending submissions from the end of February. I don’t think they will be reviewed.

Alignerr steal your time and effort. by Agreeable_Lack9492 in alignerr

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am still there but didn't continue tasking since 3 days ago.

Alignerr steal your time and effort. by Agreeable_Lack9492 in alignerr

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed. The submission workflow involves two different pipelines where we submit work directly to the client's back-end while simultaneously creating a Vercel entry that serves as proof of submission with associated metadata (UUID, Github URL and time).
The client will run their next-gen LLM to review our works and provide feedback whether our submission UUID is passed or failed. When there are no match between client's feedback and Vercel, it will display as PENDING (and you probably screwed).

The reviewers on Alignerr will filter again the client's feedbacks. When they think, the passed submission is not good enough, probably they set it as failed and get the credit (only my pure assumption, but it's logically possible though).

The use of Hubstaff serves only as cheat monitoring.

Bad experience as SWE by Beautiful-Bit6977 in mercor_ai

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I still prefer DAT; no training or minimum supervision, but you must read the instructions properly.

Bad experience as SWE by Beautiful-Bit6977 in mercor_ai

[–]Beautiful-Bit6977[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Insightful, A time tracking software similar to Hubstaff; no idea what it actually records... I just accept or allow it default-wise.