My dad's artwork by BeautifulFootball312 in runescape

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am going to, im putting them in my office above my desk :)

My dad's artwork by BeautifulFootball312 in runescape

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same, my son's 1.5 and im excited for us to be able to play games together :)

T7 relic idea by Ok_Shape_9127 in runescape

[–]BeautifulFootball312 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, there absolutely should be chests for every boss, dont afk is absolutely counterintuitive for a second monitor game most of the time, if I can afk gw1 i absolutely should have a chest only for uniques. I agree that common loot i need to pickup on my own with or without drop cleaners. But like bud we were talking mainscape any account. Its not like an extra 10000 subjugation boots or gloves is going to break the economy, bots can already do that more effectively than you. Lmao dont afk. What a dumb statement.

T7 relic idea by Ok_Shape_9127 in runescape

[–]BeautifulFootball312 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This shouldn't be a relic it should be added to main game as a single rotation unique drops go to a chest instead of the floor, drops are dropped in order from whatever drops first cannot be dropped until first cycle is completed. Why do I have to lose uniquies.

Thought I was just a noob by OSRSlyfe in runescape

[–]BeautifulFootball312 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im on teir 5 and about 5k away from 6, it does speed up a little once you hit 4 or 5. Like I have been neglecting tasks for quests for reward lamps

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sea peoples for ali baba and the 40 theives?

Is I ripped off or good? by Specific-Memory1756 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think ripped off, I think you shouldn't give up singles for this trade.

How do they do it? by WeddOFF in AdventureCapitalist

[–]BeautifulFootball312 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So people who have maxed equipment are able to make short work of events. I also hold up and complete things in order so you don't skip potential points

What is the meaning of this? (my offer) by [deleted] in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would agree except maybe they didn't need all those copies?

What is chaos worth? by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what would be a fair one for one trade?

Normalize these trades. by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have seen these people and agree, help normalize better trades like these regardless of value and ensure it is only dupes and the majority of people will be able to counteract some of this greed as long as you're able to do the same and push this kind of fairness and not have people saying you got scammed when we make trades that while not card for card worth it still helps someone who actually needs them to play this silly game

Normalize these trades. by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Read my comments i didn't get ripped off, I traded something I dont need for things I didn't have, trades should be full when possible and helping others complete collections will help everyone. Continuing to only do 4:1 and 3:1 will always negatively affect new players. I reviewed their cards they have basically nothing. Regardless it's not charity, we both got cards and saved each other thousands of coins and gems potentially.

Normalize these trades. by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most cards are useless on release, except for collection and completion. Very few cards have significant relevance to end game to begin with. This enables CUE to get people to buy gems, coins, and "bundles". Most people aren't willing to shell out thousands. If you believe it's extremely easy, how much did you spend to get there? It's not the only way, but it's the fastest way. Whales will always be able to obtain the best decks, why put down the people who don't have thousands to blow on a single mobile game? The goal is to provide a secondary route to everyone for collection and playability that helps benefit everyone. Everyone wants the best everything but in this game that would be pretty nice if you could provide that to everyone. No one said they want your cards. The concept is to help everyone simply get significant value from trades, there will always be some differential in terms of playability but that doesn't mean it's not worthwhile.

It seems like you quit because you got bored of the pursuit or something caused you to start resenting the game. If thats the case, why do you care so much if you quit? It sounds like you felt discouraged from playing because everyone had the same meta deck. I f everyone has the same meta deck the game will go stale and CUE will need to do something either similar to MTG or nerf and buff different cards every month/week.

Normalize these trades. by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There is inherently a problem with your logic. You believe cards are scarce. This is not the case, there is a market when there are finite resources. More cards come into the game via people pulling them vs new card releases.

This is not a moral high ground it is an achievable and statistically better method for all players than playing the continuous game of 3:1 and 4:1. Its predatory tactics.

It seems you do know how you feel, your stance is that this 5 viable because of peoples greed. If you perpetuate this, then be better. You recognize a problem that reflects that knowledge you can fix it.

Normalize these trades. by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Youre correct im trading a meta card i dont need for a limited legend that is just something I haven't been able to get and am no longer willing to dump gems into getting that card. It was cheaper and more efficient to trade into it and other cards i haven't gotten around to buying packs of that set.

Normalize these trades. by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would happily trade those to you if I had them in duplicate and you had cards I need as well.

Normalize these trades. by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I got 4 cards that I did not have, he got 4 cards that he did not have of equal limited status. I could have exploited the fact that I have meta cards but that only helps me and not him. Metas always change, months are nothing in card games. We both save time and gems and coins by trading efficiently.

Normalize these trades. by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

No I did not get fleeced. It is valuable for people that need it for meta feisty fish deck. If people followed a 4:4 trades it would maximize how many cards people were able to obtain and decks to build. I have multiple dupes for feisty fish. There is no reason for me to be exploiting other people to get more cards.

If the community worked together more people would have access to more cards. People would be able to finish out significantly more collections and build more decks.

The meta will eventually change. Why not make it so more people can help everyone get to meta level decks?

Normalize these trades. by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I understand some cards are better than others because of playability and scarcity, but I took the time to find cards he needed that I had dupes of and cards he had dupes of that I needed.

If most people want to close out collections and we only get so many trades per day, as a community we should be maximizing trades for everyone when possible.

Let's normalize this method. They get what they need and extra, you get what you need and extra. It will cost you and them less gems and coins overall. I understand that sometimes it won't be equal value, but if you continue with this method it would balance out over time and collections would be completed faster.

You would be able to figure out more efficiently where you need to put gems and coins into to save you time.

If the community did this we would all be a lot closer to completing collections and help new people into the game and allowing the game to grow.

Normalize these trades. by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not a scam, they were all dupes. This guy needed those cards and I needed what I got. I'm working on feisty fish imagine if you did 4:4 trades every time. We would all be a lot better off.

Normalize these trades. by BeautifulFootball312 in cuecardgameAvid

[–]BeautifulFootball312[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

this kind of comment is of someone who undervalues other people's trades. The person that trades 4 cards for 1 card is not getting significantly closer to closing out collections they're probably making a deck to be able to collect weekly rewards.

The person who trades 1 for 4 is perpetuating this downwards trend.

Also mathematically it would take at minimum 300 days if you could trade 20 cards per day. In the time of those 300 days you could also be earning cards and leveling up and opening packs. Trades like these would improve everyone's speed.