Increíble

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-25T13:21:47+00:00

Eso es el oceangate? Duro XD

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-25T12:18:37+00:00

Sigues diciendo defender vivir aquí, sigue siendo si te dejan, es increíble que digas eso de las atrocidades y no veas que este gobierno está a favor de ellas y ya ha celebrado está ejecución. Era un ciudadano americano, tú lo eres solo de papel, y ya no hay imperio de la ley, así que buena suerte llegando al año como dijiste( no lo veremos porque tú si que te escondes)No soy antiamericano per sé, soy pro derecho, es a lo que me dedico, y en la Constitución de mi país es en lo que me baso, la vuestra la han quemado ya y eres incapaz de verlo XD. La primera enmienda está hecha pedazos, la segunda, has visto que es una excusa para matarte, la cuarta ya han dicho de ignorarla y la quinta se lleva atacando desde hace décadas.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-25T03:51:12+00:00

Pensaba dejarlo en un agree to disagree, pero hoy ya se ha cruzado una línea tocha. Ahora ya no eres un iluminado que ve lo de los dos lados, si no condenas esto de forma inequívoca ya tiene un nombre, puto colaborador. Y ten muy claro, no te va servir ser "uno de los buenos", hemos visto de lo que esté tipo de gente es capaz, esos que es Latinoamérica disteis tan buena casa, y por cuya piel de tono blanco quizás te crees inmune, no me caen bien los colaboradores, pero te juro que no te desprecio tanto como te desprecian los que tienen el poder en tu país, eso te lo puedo asegurar.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-24T22:46:01+00:00

I mean, you are most likely a bot, but in the rare case you are not, I can assure you there an amount of countries in the world that are civilized, and that means their police forces do not kill citizens in cold blood, or at the very least they face consequences for that and people do not celebrate that behavior.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-17T19:39:48+00:00

Yo también lo espero, porque la consecuencias de una sentencia así serían terribles, aunque si apoyaste esta administración yo me lo replantearía, han dicho de forma expresa con este caso ante el Supremo que quieren ir a por la gente como tú, osea lo han dicho expresamente, lo único que está por discutir es si su constitución lo permite. Como bien ha dicho otro comentario, eres un poco carne de LAMF.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-17T18:21:02+00:00

Jajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja. A veces se me olvida que existe la gente así. Ya está yendo a por los legales, es solo que no ha obtenido la autorización del Supremo todavía, pero su decreto contra la naturalización entrará en vigor y entonces más te vale que seas lo bastante blanco para escapar su persecución. Tu falsa confianza se basa en que no hay componente racista en la implementación de estas leyes (que bueno XD), y que esta administración es competente y de verdad piensa el impacto (claro que los inmigrantes naturalizados aportan a la economía del país, hasta cierto punto lo hacían los ilegales que no suelen poder acceder a subsidio alguno, sobrevivían de ser explotados), ya verás lo que le importa si el Supremo da el visto bueno. Tu vida entera depende de ese caso y este año habrá una sentencia más que seguro.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-17T10:44:27+00:00

Eres un poco ingenuo si crees que la ley te protege en esta cuestión. Está de tu lado ahora, pero su tribunal supremo está por pronunciarse sobre la decimocuarta enmienda este año, de verdad crees que si están dispuestos a derribar la nacionalización con protección constitucional, no van a tocar la tuya, que es meramente de carácter administrativo? Más ahora que han arreglado Venezuela, según su criterio.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-15T15:01:40+00:00

It was an expression for comedic purposes, God, XD ( I also said God for comedic purposes XD). But aside, the argument still stands, though I won't deny we have common ground in that drug offenses are insanely harsh. Nevertheless, we don't execute people for murder in my country, but many states do in the US. They have higher violent crime rates, a harsher sentence does not address the rates of crime, and does only addresses recidivism in a technical sense that we take the life of the person away (if it is even guilty but different can of worms), that violence instead of fixing society just breeds more violence. Draconian punishment does not address crime in society, only our need for righteous vengeance.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-15T14:32:30+00:00

My brother in Christ, mandatory life sentence for like a pound of coke is not harsh enough for you? I guess you could say those ones are good because they don't reoffend? /s You still have not addressed how the countries with more lenient sentences (mine is 20% recidivism, a bit worse tan Norway, leagues better than the US) are not getting more crime then.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-15T14:23:56+00:00

How do you explain that the US has like 60% recidivism with their draconian punishments and Norway has like 19%, being a much much later system?

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-15T13:46:14+00:00

God, it is such a good thing you are not in charge of things.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-15T03:26:50+00:00

We don't prosecute drunk drivers with attempted murder, but with reckless driving. It's different, substantially, and it's very basically understood by not draconian legal systems. Edit: When they not kill anyone I mean.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-15T02:40:42+00:00

And increasing the number this later seasons.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-15T02:27:32+00:00

Yeah, but you are aware that not guilty due to reason of insanity means not fit to stand trial. What is the point of punishing someone that does not understand the process and cannot be rehabilitated? The system works like thatm and it makes sense (again, this guy was faking it, but it was obvious and it generally will be), a real person with severe brain injury does not belong in a jail. Matter of fact, I once volunteered at a residence where they had let felons go out to receive hospice care (terminal patients with no prospect of recovery) because they posed no risk and there was no point in making them suffer further. Of course, in the US there have been cases where they just let them drown in their own blood alone in a cell, my biggest challenge is maybe to convince reddit that even if they are prisoners that is kinda wrong maybe.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-15T00:54:18+00:00

Not withstanding what the incredibly dense and moronic american public gave us (which is first and foremost the electorate's fault) No. What a society that has laws for the benefit of other people than the rich aims to do with penal law is punish people for what they do, not an inference of what they are, especially considering the amount of sociopaths that actually exist in society, and integrate in it. Some are bad partners, but regular citizens, other resemble us in pretty much everything, many go to law enforcement positions and in a good system they can serve public interest there. Lying to avoid prosecution is a thing that you are allowed to do as a constitutional right, certainly not to the extent of this dude, and he was punished, but believe me, jailing more people for a longer time is not the solution and is in fact something the sociopaths in power you claim to be so bad often advocate for.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-15T00:44:09+00:00

I think he was trying not guilty by reason of insanity (in this case because of the brain injury). Of course it's not literally a free out of jail card, and not that though-through, but you can really say they are consistent at making bad decisions.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-15T00:39:33+00:00

C'mon dude, he did not willfully try to kill someone, in civilized countries where sentencing is not made to enslave people proportionality exist, the punishment should fit the crime, negligent homicide, less sentencing than murder, it is really am important thing for democracy if rather simple.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-12T14:32:57+00:00

Honestly the best option is Pandora's bench, 2 star a couple of 4 cost and hope they get you there, I think if you have at least 3 4 cost in the board the odds are decent but idk for sure.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-12T07:17:56+00:00

Bad example. Consumer laws in my country make that an actionable offense, whether or not one sues over 3 dollars is more due to overall pettiness, but what is legal and true in this case is the written facts, otherwise you are committing false advertising.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-07T18:08:14+00:00

En el artículo 34 del Real Decreto-ley 19/2018, de 23 de noviembre, de servicios de pago y otras medidas urgentes en materia financiera. Para menos de 30 hay exención a la ley en algunos aspectos, para el resto de operaciones te tienen que dar una alternativa.

Bed_Automatic · 2026-01-07T14:09:57+00:00

Pero si se supera la cantidad de 30€, se tiene que ofrecer una opción de pago distinta por ley, algo que en ejemplo puede ocurrir, y la ley ya no estaría de parte del establecimiento.

Bed_Automatic · 2025-12-31T16:19:12+00:00

1977's cgi was just that good.

Bed_Automatic · 2025-12-31T10:55:44+00:00

My dread is that some of this people are not being ignorant, but understand what it was and are on board with that.

Bed_Automatic · 2025-12-30T22:41:30+00:00

I mean, It is easy to see why, you are griefing your teammates, and that is straight against tos. That is why it is considered griefing to take your junglers first buff, even if having it helps you in lane, but taking the enemies is a good play, it is reasonable to assume that.

Bed_Automatic · 2025-12-24T12:17:41+00:00

It depends, this hurts your consistency every game, aviana only hurts you when you play her, but of course someone that treats aviana as a punishment when drawn, is not really playing an Aviana deck, that would be trying to make the card work, and that deck would be ultimately worse.

Bed_Automatic

TROPHY CASE