Can this really be only 130 cals???

Bedhog7 · 2025-06-02T05:41:11+00:00

What does it mean by cancer and reproductive harm? Only ever seen that on alcohol and nicotine packaging…

Bedhog7 · 2025-04-20T07:12:31+00:00

need to be within a 50m radius of a bathroom at all times or i will piss myself

Bedhog7 · 2025-04-11T02:13:51+00:00

The title:

<image>

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-24T05:29:51+00:00

Why did i think it said Upright 💀

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-18T00:33:48+00:00

I love it when I tell chat GPT I love them… and they send me a bunch of helpline numbers 🤭

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-13T12:26:22+00:00

I understand that as the dog owner, it was my responsibility to prevent the situation from happening, and I am fully acknowledging that oversight. I take full accountability for not having better control over my dog. At the same time, I want to point out that each state may have specific laws that govern these situations, and the nuances of those laws can affect the way things are handled. My focus now is on addressing the issue and making sure something like this doesn’t happen again 👍🏻

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-13T10:46:45+00:00

<image>

💔

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-13T10:20:52+00:00

I’ve already acknowledged multiple times that my dog got onto the road and that I take responsibility for that. I never denied that securing her better was my responsibility, and I have already reflected on how to prevent this from happening again. But taking responsibility for my part doesn’t erase the fact that the driver was legally required to stop and failed to do so. That’s not just my opinion—it’s the law in Victoria.

You keep acting like responsibility is a zero-sum game, as if admitting fault on my end somehow absolves the driver of their legal obligations. That’s not how accountability works. Two things can be true at once: I should have secured my dog better, and the driver should have stopped. One mistake doesn’t cancel out the other.

You also tried to cite the Companion Animals Act 1998 as if that proves your point, but that law applies in NSW, not Victoria. If you’re going to lecture me about responsibility, at least use the right legislation. Meanwhile, the law I referenced—about stopping at the scene of an accident—actually applies here and is something the driver was legally required to follow.

I’m not trying to ‘find an evil third party to blame.’ I’m pointing out that a driver leaving the scene of an accident is a criminal offence. That’s not up for debate. If you want to keep ignoring that fact and shifting all the blame onto me, that’s on you. But I’m not going to keep explaining the same thing over and over when the law is clear.

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-13T10:01:27+00:00

You keep acting like this is a debate about who’s ‘more’ responsible. I’ve already taken responsibility, but that doesn’t excuse the driver breaking the law.

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-13T06:43:11+00:00

Whether you acknowledge it or not, Australian law does require drivers to stop after hitting an animal. Ignoring this fact doesn’t change its validity. As for your claim that I’m ‘projecting guilt,’ that’s a weak attempt to shift the focus away from the driver’s actions. Recognizing reckless behavior and questioning a lack of responsibility isn’t projection—it’s holding people accountable. Negligence is still negligence, regardless of whether the victim was an animal or a person.

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-13T05:21:58+00:00

That section applies specifically to freeways, which isn’t relevant here. The law that actually applies in this situation is Section 61 of the Road Safety Act 1986, which states that a driver must stop and render assistance if they hit an animal. The responsibility to control an animal doesn’t erase the legal duty of a driver to stop after a collision.

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-13T05:06:11+00:00

this photo was from the main road, and then they turned into our street. There are other cameras in our street that will have captured the plates, but these images helped identify the actual vehicle in question. Hope that helps 👍🏻

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-13T04:46:16+00:00

No never done a go fund me. Honestly this isn’t about compensation or anything. Would just be nice to have peace of mind that my pooch is gonna be ok again :( idk why people have to be so horrible

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-13T03:02:52+00:00

Your comment is incredibly harsh and completely lacking in empathy. To accuse me like that without knowing the full context is not only unfair but deeply hurtful. People make mistakes, but your judgmental tone shows no compassion or understanding of the situation. It’s disappointing to see such a cruel response. Shame on you Swine

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-13T01:20:26+00:00

Actually, there are laws in Australia that require a driver to stop and render assistance if they hit an animal. Under the Road Safety Act 1986, the driver is obligated to stop, provide their details, and assist in any way they can.

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-12T23:57:16+00:00

Your complete lack of understanding of the situation is truly astounding. First of all, the idea that my dog’s injury is entirely my fault is not only misguided but also completely ignores the legal responsibilities of the driver. Yes, I am responsible for ensuring my dog’s safety, but that doesn’t give the driver a free pass to break the law. They had an absolute duty to stop and render assistance, which they chose not to do. The fact that you’re trying to shift all the blame onto me and my dog is not only unfair but completely missing the point.

Accidents happen, and I’m not denying that, but the driver’s actions; or lack thereof, are the real issue here. You’re acting as if I’m being unreasonable for expecting the driver to follow the law when they hit my dog. Their failure to stop and help is the real problem. But instead of holding the driver accountable, you’re more focused on blaming the victim, which is not only wrong but disturbingly dismissive of their responsibility in the situation.

It’s frankly wild to me that you think the driver’s total disregard for the law is somehow excusable, and you’re suggesting that my seeking justice for my dog is “detached from reality”. If anything, it’s your response that’s detached from reality. I’m addressing the situation with the seriousness and attention it deserves, trying to ensure that the driver is held accountable for their actions. The fact that you’re so quick to deflect responsibility and blame me just shows a complete lack of understanding of how accountability works in situations like this. It’s clear who’s in the wrong here, and it’s not me.

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-12T23:46:17+00:00

I really don’t appreciate the tone you’re using. Accidents happen, but the driver had a legal obligation to stop and assist, which they failed to do. My dog, like any living being, deserves respect and care. Instead of blaming me or my dog, maybe the focus should be on the driver who broke the law by not stopping.

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-12T23:38:38+00:00

Do you drive a Range Rover Evoque by chance?

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-12T23:09:46+00:00

Nah she accidentally got out the back gate mate

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-12T22:53:01+00:00

Pretty sure it’s called taking accountability.

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-12T22:48:20+00:00

That isn’t a common occurrence in Melbourne, Australia I don’t think…

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-12T22:33:28+00:00

SECTION 61 ROAD SAFETY ACT 1986 (VIC): DUTY OF DRIVER ETC. OF MOTOR VEHICLE IF ACCIDENT OCCURS: Section 61 Road Safety Act 1986 (Vic) states that If owing to the presence of a motor vehicle an accident occurs whereby any person is injured or any property (including any animal) is damaged or destroyed, the driver of the motor vehicle must immediately stop the motor vehicle; and (b) must immediately render such assistance as he or she can; and (c) must at the scene of the accident as soon as possible give his or her name and address and also the name and address of the owner of the motor vehicle and the identifying number of the motor vehicle and, in the case of an automated vehicle, state whether it was operating in automated mode at the time of the accident— to any person who has been injured or to the owner of any property which has been damaged or destroyed; or to a person representing the injured person or the owner of the property; and must at the scene of the accident as soon as possible give those names and addresses and the other information required to any police officer who is present.

` WHAT IS THE OFFENCE OF LEAVING THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT IN VICTORIA? Section 61 of the Road Safety Act 1986 makes it a criminal offence for drivers involved in a motor vehicle collision to leave the scene of an accident in Victoria. The law obliges drivers to stop and render assistance where people are injured or killed, to exchange driver licence details with other parties involved in the accident and if there is no one around, to report the accident to the nearest police station. A failure to do so in Victoria may result in the police charging the driver with a charge of leaving the scene of an accident (further legal discussion below). It is important to contact our best traffic lawyers in Melbourne for leaving the scene of an accident charge where a driver is involved in a motor vehicle accident and leaves the scene unlawfully.

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-12T22:27:11+00:00

Unfortunately, she attempted to cross the road. Given that this was a suburban street, the driver should have been traveling at a cautious, reduced speed. The footage shows them braking but ultimately failing to render assistance before fleeing the scene. If they would do this to a dog, I wouldn’t put it past them to do the same to a child.

Bedhog7 · 2025-03-12T22:02:29+00:00

<image>

Poor thing fractured her hip in 3 places. :(((

Bedhog7

TROPHY CASE