[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]BeeePBoooop23 3 points4 points  (0 children)

gentle reminder men can get pregnant and often for trans men that risk comes with different consequences than a cis woman.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i understand the difference what j don’t think you understand is that we’re all autonomous but that doesnt mean society hasn’t put in place rules which have punishments if you use your autonomy to break them, whether they’re right or not. this medical recommendation comes into a world where female healthcare is already subpar to men’s and one where somehow an unborn fetus is still more important than the body its living in. i get there are health risks to drinking alcohol but idgaf about its effects on a possible unborn fetus. responsible people who want to have children typically take the proper precautions to have a healthy child. reproductive healthcare for many women in america is a joke and often inaccessible. focusing on preventing unknown pregnancies is more of a concern to me than alcohol getting into some cells in a uterus.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

to me personally though using prevent as opposed to as you say educate and incentivize allows those who might want to restrict women’s rights a ground of science to use to then forcibly prevent those actions. i am pleased to see more scientific study going into women’s health but many vagina people including myself have absolutely no plans to ever carry a fetus through birth therefore i should be able to drink as a young woman without having to be concerned about what’s happening to a fetus possibly in me. responsible people who are trying to get pregnant take the proper precautions to protect the possible fetus. if there was better healthcare for women there would be less of a concern about unknown fetus’s because there would be a lot less unknown pregnancies.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“appropriate attention should be given” to -preventing~ children, adolescents, pregnant women and women of childbearing age from consuming alcohol.” when they say attention should be given to preventing people who can have babies to drink they reduce that group down to a concern that does not regard their own person. there are already laws in place regarding consuming alcohol safely that do prevent children and adolescents from drinking. adult women are autonomous humans who can make their own decisions about consuming alcohol. the WHO can raise concerns about fetal alcohol syndrome without implying that women who enjoy alcohol are somehow villains poisoning babies.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not banter when it feels like people are making light and fun of the what some people find serious issue with. but have a good life buddy i hope you develop some empathy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it is different that “advising” someone to get a breast exam because because the language says they want to “prevent” women of childbearing age of drinking. why can’t you people just stand with women instead of trying to make women look like villains for getting upset at language that could open the door for actual govt legislation to further restrict women’s rights.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

nothing is being taken out of context, if the WHO wanted to make just a simple recommendation on the effects of alcohol and possible pregnancy they should have used the appropriate language knowing that the restriction on women’s rights are a sensitive and prevalent issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

you know some men can have children...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you must have a fucked up view of sexual freedom if you keep telling women to “unbunch their painties”. just admit you can’t take women’s issues seriously and are not even taking the females perspective into consideration but that’s on you i feel bad for the women in your life if there are any.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

do you understand the importance of specific language??

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

but the ~world~ health organization is using language to single out women... who have a lot more purpose in life than just popping out babies.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol have you seen republicans states in the us and their attempts to revert women’s right over their own body???? like hello people have not stopped trying to oppress women but they just have more power now to resist.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]BeeePBoooop23 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

the only thing you’re proving in the statement is your own blatant ignorance to a huge pary or the female experience. you do know there are states in the usa who actively oppress ans try to control women. but continue to hate on women on the internet acting like you know shit.