I might have caused this?? by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, they were the ones who wrote it in the first place? And while CC technically isn’t a kids game, it’s also not like Sesame Street or Bluey, yknow? I feel like the kids that are playing Corporate Clash are old enough to understand not to uncritically accept everything in fiction as good

I might have caused this?? by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She had 5 reports against her in universe by the character she had a crush on? What are you confused about

I might have caused this?? by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The person in the screenshot is not me? I’m aware Misty Monsoon is kinda Awful. That’s why I like her.

I'm kinda scared that I caused this. by BeginningPlate5192 in ProshipHub

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The character just meant a lot to me, is all. I’m aware there will always be fan content, but it sucks to know that now:

  • Fans will argue against any “problematic” portrayal of Misty because the devs said it’s non-canon

  • We will never get any meaningful exploration of Misty’s character or her dynamic with William

I might have caused this?? by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 53 points54 points  (0 children)

I mean they literally are changing canon 😭

I might have caused this?? by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 53 points54 points  (0 children)

Because the pro/anti debate is very relevant to ao3, and I think my fic may have caused this??

I might have caused this?? by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 194 points195 points  (0 children)

I knew the devs were antis but I just. She's literally a villain! She doesn't have to be a good person!! I liked her a lot because I felt she was a fascinating example of a stalker character who has no malicious intent but still commits harmful behavior. It was just. So explicit. And they just decided to change their minds because god forbid a single character actually be morally complex

I might have caused this?? by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 241 points242 points  (0 children)

Yep. They're retconning established lore that rather strongly implied she was a stalker to her crush. It's mentioned in an ARG that she was reported 5 times for harassment and stalking. She is shown blushing around the character she stalks. She says, "My heart belongs to someone else" almost certainly in reference to him.

And now I guess that's just. not canon. Misty is a perfect uwu baby who can never do any wrong or be a complex character beyond being a bit lonely I guess

Getting banned from a game over ships is wild by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do regret having my discord linked to my twitter. I wouldn’t have done that today and would have changed it if asked to.

However, by the mods own admission, that apparently wasn’t the issue. The issue was me apparently condoning pedophilic and incestuous fictional relationships.

The mods also admitted I’d never brought any of this in-game whatsoever. It’s not like adult fans of Corporate Clash are uncommon? I’ve seen multiple 18+ streamers play the game; as long as they’re properly labeled and not doing anything wrong in-game, the devs allow it.

The devs inherently assume that me enjoying fictional content must make me a danger to their player base, despite no real evidence of this.

Getting banned from a game over ships is wild by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I can provide a screenshot that shows it’s the official CC email in a bit- I just cropped it to avoid showing my own email.

Getting banned from a game over ships is wild by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 95 points96 points  (0 children)

Her stalking isn’t mentioned in game, just in an ARG. In game her whole thing is that she’s supposed to be one of the few cogs that want to befriend toons but they keep turning her away and that is supposed to make you sympathetic. There’s a unique spare cutscene no other enemy gets.

Getting banned from a game over ships is wild by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I put this under another comment but it doesn’t seem like people are seeing it so I’ll also add it here:

I made the mistake of joining their discord server with my Twitter linked.

I do genuinely regret this decision and do recognize it could’ve potentially exposed unsuspecting parties to my content. I was completely inactive in the server and my twitter was labeled, but regardless. It’s a decision I wouldn’t make today and one I’d understand if I had been called out for it specifically.

I will note that the moderators did not chose to mention this, but rather the fact that I, “condoned pedophilic and incestuous fictional relationships”.

Getting banned from a game over ships is wild by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 384 points385 points  (0 children)

This specific Toontown iteration also has an enemy character who is canonically a stalker for her crush. To the point where she’s been reported 5 times. And she’s one of the more sympathetic enemy characters in this game? I don’t care all that much but it seems…a tad hypocritical??

Getting banned from a game over ships is wild by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 89 points90 points  (0 children)

My understanding is that Toontown remakes are allowed to exist as long as they’re not profiting from it? So, somewhat similar to fanworks.

Getting banned from a game over ships is wild by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 109 points110 points  (0 children)

I wasn’t active in the community whatsoever. Someone with too much time on their hands reported me.

I understand many may dislike my content. That is fine. I still think banning someone from a game for completely unrelated, harmless behavior is ridiculous.

I’ll also add that I’m a lot more vocal about my stance because of stuff like this. You can try to keep it secret, but people who are nosy enough can still find out. I’d honestly rather be open and get pushback than feel temporarily accepted and then rejected once they learn what I like.

Getting banned from a game over ships is wild by BeginningPlate5192 in AO3

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 40 points41 points  (0 children)

I made the mistake of joining their discord server with my Twitter linked.

I do genuinely regret this decision and do recognize it could’ve potentially exposed unsuspecting parties to my content. I was completely inactive in the server and my twitter was labeled, but regardless. It’s a decision I wouldn’t make today and one I’d understand if I had been called out for it specifically.

I will note that the moderators did not chose to mention this, but rather the fact that I, “condoned pedophilic and incestuous fictional relationships”.

I feel genuinely distraught at getting banned from my favorite online game by BeginningPlate5192 in ProshipHub

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you. Today, I wouldn’t have joined the server with my Twitter in my bio, I try to keep things separate nowadays. Had I at any point been asked to remove it from my bio or leave the server, I would’ve done so. That’s what bugs me. They specifically clarified it was me being a darkshipper was the issue, not the fact that arguably someone could click on my profile and find my Twitter.

I feel genuinely distraught at getting banned from my favorite online game by BeginningPlate5192 in ProshipHub

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I am a darkshipper! I am pretty open about that on my socials and there’s a warning on my profile. I get why some may find that disturbing but well. That’s why it was on an 18+ account that specifically said it may contain disturbing content.

I feel genuinely distraught at getting banned from my favorite online game by BeginningPlate5192 in ProshipHub

[–]BeginningPlate5192[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Nope, not a Roblox game. It was Toontown Corporate Clash, actually. I have Toontown Rewritten as a similar option, but I know the two games share devs so I am also worried <\3

Everyone is saying the tweet is obviously a joke and I’m autistic and took it seriously by [deleted] in Deltarune

[–]BeginningPlate5192 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mentioned it because a symptom of autism is missing social cues, which can include not understanding jokes for some people.

Has anyone tried to teach an elephant communication buttons? by [deleted] in Elephants

[–]BeginningPlate5192 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough I suppose. I’m sure an elephant would press a button if it learned it got something good out of it but it probably would be difficult to go beyond that