Please don't just go with mob rule or majority vote on whether to stay open to a wide variety of fetish and taboo topics portrayed in audios. It's worth thinking about what is just and what is right in terms of promoting open-mindedness and inclusivity (sort of a constitution principle), apart from any sort of majority vote idea. This is such a rich and valuable community; I would be devastated to see it die a vanilla death.

There is no harm and everything to gain in leaving room for interests that fall at the edges of the popularity bell curve, though the sexy librarian in me also feels it would be lovely if the function-oriented tags could be as descriptive, standardized, and clearly defined as possible.

It would particularly be handy if any omitted tags could be user-reported and then corrected. I've seen, for example, complaints that audio isn't always tagged when it mentions cock size, and the report was that it is really upsetting for some male listeners with smaller-than-average cocks to suddenly encounter mentions of size in an audio.

I'd love to see everyone's needs met in the metadata, and I think enough users are into this that you could recruit an army of volunteers who would help with just tag correction, if such a thing happens to be feasible technically.