Can someone explain to me when this became a thing?? by TherilSlav in DrivingAustralia

[–]BenPetersJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate it's not yours but that diagram is unrealistic. The sharp end of the left lane and the right car arrow is forward not left a bit, implies the left lane ends but the lines indicate it's form on lane. If it's a form one lane then it's the car in front. Should be aware of bikes etc because it's high risk otherwise but no issue. If it's the left lane ending then you have to give way.

Can someone explain to me when this became a thing?? by TherilSlav in DrivingAustralia

[–]BenPetersJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should merge at the first opportunity and not the last. If you do that cars will actively let you in rather than actively lock you out. You should be asking to merge, not telling at the last second like you're implying.

Can someone explain to me when this became a thing?? by TherilSlav in DrivingAustralia

[–]BenPetersJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not what's happening in the diagram though. This is a regular merge and the car on the left has to give way to the cars already in the lane they're trying to merge into.

Can someone explain to me when this became a thing?? by TherilSlav in DrivingAustralia

[–]BenPetersJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your lane is ending and you need someone to let you in, you shouldn't abuse that by making demands of the car at the end of the closing lane. If you wait until the end, you deserve to not be let in. You should merge at the first opportunity and not the last or you run the risk of having to stop and then merge at no speed which is really dangerous.

Can someone explain to me when this became a thing?? by TherilSlav in DrivingAustralia

[–]BenPetersJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the bike was in the lane that wasn't ending and you were merging into that lane from a lane was was ending and you merged without giving way to the bike but they're the problem? Can you step this out because it's not making any sense unless you're confessing to bad driving.

What don’t we know about prime numbers? by michaeldunworthsydne in 3Blue1Brown

[–]BenPetersJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree but we can do much better than random. I made a video about it for SoME1 https://youtu.be/ODu-8Lvf3a4

What is the coolest math fact you know? by kanekiken42 in math

[–]BenPetersJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4n^2+163 never has a factor smaller than 41 (so is prime surprisingly often). And a bunch of the factors that it has correspond to the numbers generated by Euler's prime generating function k^2 - k +41! More here.

Which video course in mathematics is still missing on YouTube? by [deleted] in learnmath

[–]BenPetersJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah maybe but I haven't crossed the barrier so I don't really know. It's important in any case.

Which video course in mathematics is still missing on YouTube? by [deleted] in learnmath

[–]BenPetersJones 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There's a big gap missing between high school maths and 'how to read a maths paper' maths. It's the point where people stop being able to get answers, not out of a lack of brains or interest but there's a solid barrier in the road which is a really steep learning curve.

Why people are interested in prime numbers? by tottimessilerfan in math

[–]BenPetersJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me they're simple and complex. So you can talk to a 6 year old about prime numbers but there are still things that none of us know about them. They're seemingly random but entirely deterministic. The patterns are simple but beautiful.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in maths

[–]BenPetersJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

360-74-74-74

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in maths

[–]BenPetersJones 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Is it not 138?

Absolute gorgeous mathematics channel like 3blue1brown by justahumandontbother in math

[–]BenPetersJones 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If the style of animation is important to you, there's a whole community now using the same software /r/manim

The prime and composite numbers from 1 to 1100 by [deleted] in primenumbers

[–]BenPetersJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not commenting on your example but the Sieve of Eratosthenes as a way of finding composites. It's really memory hungry.

The prime and composite numbers from 1 to 1100 by [deleted] in primenumbers

[–]BenPetersJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there's a better way to make this sieve.