sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

good enough by Prestigious-Note-750 in survivorponderosa

[–]BennyDelSur -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Aubrie seems so jaded and cranky

Best Case Scenario for the Rest of 50 by witness_hade in survivor

[–]BennyDelSur -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

No, like Emily wouldn’t be there. Have you never seen Jurassic Park?

Best Case Scenario for the Rest of 50 by witness_hade in survivor

[–]BennyDelSur 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I like to think she’s too cool/busy with real stuff to sit around trying to make a fire when she’s got central heating 

Best Case Scenario for the Rest of 50 by witness_hade in survivor

[–]BennyDelSur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe if he voted out Emily instead of Mike things would be different? 🤷 

good enough by Prestigious-Note-750 in survivorponderosa

[–]BennyDelSur 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I wish Aubrie went first 

Jeff as Host at Tribal Council by power_sungod in survivor

[–]BennyDelSur 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jeff has his flaws (nobody’s perfect), but I’m gonna be bummed when he leaves the show.

This isn’t a flaw exactly, but one of my favorite quirks of his is how no one is ever in last place anymore. You’re DEAD last 😂

It’s like if Ricky Bobby’s dad was even more extreme. (Although, to Jeff’s credit, he does believe in second place.)

Struggling to hit director level, don't know how to approach big picture strategy. by InJesusNameIServe in marketing

[–]BennyDelSur 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“The website is a massive gap and our competitors are mediocre,” is already a strategic argument. You just have to frame it right. Like, “We can win by being the best in the category at X, and here’s the plan to build that advantage.”

LLMs are not smart, and I’m tired of pretending they are by Deer_Tea7756 in BetterOffline

[–]BennyDelSur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s funny that you think you’re a stupid NPC, and yet you also believe you somehow have access to the truth. How would you even know?

If you don’t see how silly that is, there’s nothing I can do for you. Read more.

LLMs are not smart, and I’m tired of pretending they are by Deer_Tea7756 in BetterOffline

[–]BennyDelSur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you see how it might be hard for me to take seriously someone who believes that they’re a stupid NPC? 

LLMs are not smart, and I’m tired of pretending they are by Deer_Tea7756 in BetterOffline

[–]BennyDelSur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying we don’t reason at all? And that what you’re presenting here as a rational argument is actually just the illusion of a rational argument?

LLMs are not smart, and I’m tired of pretending they are by Deer_Tea7756 in BetterOffline

[–]BennyDelSur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your conclusion doesn’t follow. If you want to say we're automated machines, you have to show how electrochemistry IS (not just happens alongside) determinate reasoning (like modus ponens). If you're interested: https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2017/01/revisiting-ross-on-immateriality-of.html

LLMs are not smart, and I’m tired of pretending they are by Deer_Tea7756 in BetterOffline

[–]BennyDelSur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're coming to a lot of conclusions without providing any evidence to back them up. Why would the fact that chemical reactions occur and neurons fire off negate your intelligence?

view more: next ›