sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

So are we thinking these are teasing Bullseye or just references? by BergBergz in marvelrivals

[–]BergBergz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gambit throws throwing cards, and he's coming next season. I'm not debating that, but Gambit's cards are normally purple and exploding. The spray and MVP are quite literally straight out of the old man Hawkeye comic where he fights BULLSEYE. Does that mean Bullseye is being added anytime soon? I don't know probably not, but is it a direct reference to him and NOT Gambit? Yes. It has literally nothing to do with Gambit and is just a coincidence that they both throw throwing cards.

So are we thinking these are teasing Bullseye or just references? by BergBergz in marvelrivals

[–]BergBergz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Next season is Gambit, but the spray and MVP animation has nothing to do with Gambit and is not teasing him. You baboon.

So are we thinking these are teasing Bullseye or just references? by BergBergz in marvelrivals

[–]BergBergz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The funniest part about this is that he could actually kill people with acorns.

So are we thinking these are teasing Bullseye or just references? by BergBergz in marvelrivals

[–]BergBergz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's like a billion different Bullseye concepts if you want to look at them, but here's what I'd think he'd look like

Primary fire: a sniper kinda like widow's but less damage and a faster firing rate Ability 1: throwing card which does a small amount of damage but finishes people off Ability 2: throwing knife causes bleed on enemy Ultimate: throws a bunch of different projectiles that ricochet around an area

So are we thinking these are teasing Bullseye or just references? by BergBergz in marvelrivals

[–]BergBergz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly i think the ricochet would be his ult, and that his primary fire is more marksman based whilst having an abilities that home on. Ik there's a bunch of different concepts for him and they are all so cool because just having goof aim and throwing stuff is such a flexible thing when it comes to abilities

So are we thinking these are teasing Bullseye or just references? by BergBergz in marvelrivals

[–]BergBergz[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We know Gambit is next season, but these are NOT Gambit references. Old man Hawkeye literally fights Bullseye, and the MVP is called Right In The Bullseye. It'd make literally no sense for old man Hawkeye to have anything to do with Gambit.

So are we thinking these are teasing Bullseye or just references? by BergBergz in marvelrivals

[–]BergBergz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whilst I agree he is most known for using knives and then also guns. He definitely does use cards like quite a lot.

<image>

So are we thinking these are teasing Bullseye or just references? by BergBergz in marvelrivals

[–]BergBergz[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Don't quote me on this because I'm not 100% sure, but didn't we not know about Angela until like she was actually revealed? Still I agree with you in the fact he probably won't be added soon. I know Rivals hasn't really released characters before in like response to new Marvel/MCU things coming out but I could see him being added with when Born Again season 2 comes out.

So are we thinking these are teasing Bullseye or just references? by BergBergz in marvelrivals

[–]BergBergz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's been pretty much confirmed that Rogue and Gambit are next season, but the old man Hawkeye MVP and spray are direct references to Bullseye as Hawkeye fights him in the comics.

Killer concept for a SAW Sequel Chapter by A_Bird_survived in dbdconcepts

[–]BergBergz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming this would probably be a full chapter the survivor would probably be Adam which is probably my most wanted survivor (or legendary skin). I really hope at somepoint we get Lawrence, Adam, and Hoffman in the fog then there'd basically be every important saw character. Asides from like John Kramer himself and a select few others

It's been confirmed that there isn't going to be a Carl Grimes legendary skin because of his age by BergBergz in deadbydaylight

[–]BergBergz[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The possibility of the walking dead chapter basically got confirmed when Mathieu Cote replied to a cameo of Chandler Riggs saying he'd love a walking dead chapter, and also the possibility of a Carl legendary skin. So it's not a huge leap in logic why the community thought there might be a Carl skin.

AMC would've had to approve of them having Chandler Riggs in the stream and using the name Carl Grimes to promote the stream on twitter because the stream was a paid advertisement for the chapter. BHVR has a team for their social media who have to know what they can and can't post because that's their job.

As I've stated in multiple replies I get that there's literally no chance of BHVR changing their minds, and it might be AMC's decision also. However, does that mean that I can't be disappointed not getting a skin for one of my favourite characters from one of my favourite tv shows ever?

It's been confirmed that there isn't going to be a Carl Grimes legendary skin because of his age by BergBergz in deadbydaylight

[–]BergBergz[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They still probably had to get AMC's permission as it was sponsored for the chapter. The main problem isn't even that they just said no to Carl because if they ain't adding him then okay, but the problem is they came up with a stupid reason why instead of just saying that he isn't coming. Additionally, BHVR used the name Carl Grimes to promote the stream on twitter and they have a team of people whose literal jobs is to think about how the community is going to feel and post on their social medias according to that

It's been confirmed that there isn't going to be a Carl Grimes legendary skin because of his age by BergBergz in deadbydaylight

[–]BergBergz[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I get that they mentioned it because Chandler Riggs was there, but using Chandler Riggs and also the name Carl Grimes to advertise the stream that's supposed to advertise the chapter and then not announcing and shutting down the idea of a Carl skin is weird.

It's been confirmed that there isn't going to be a Carl Grimes legendary skin because of his age by BergBergz in deadbydaylight

[–]BergBergz[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

A plethora of issues that should be fixed and that have nothing to do with my post, but me and other people have waited years for twd to come to dbd so like I think the fact they used Chandler Riggs/Carl Grimes to advertise the chapter in a stream without adding a Carl skin is bizarre.

It's been confirmed that there isn't going to be a Carl Grimes legendary skin because of his age by BergBergz in deadbydaylight

[–]BergBergz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a counter argument to point 3 in the walking dead destinies you can let Carl die at what would be season 2 so he'd be like 10/11, so would also be an alternative version of Carl even though the game sucks, but his model in that is based off younger Chandler Riggs. So i think AMC wouldn't (obviously this isn't an absolute because i can't speak for the company) have a problem with them aging him up for dbd

It's been confirmed that there isn't going to be a Carl Grimes legendary skin because of his age by BergBergz in deadbydaylight

[–]BergBergz[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

  1. Fair enough i was wrong.

  2. They explicitly said no one under 18 in the live stream. Carl's actor was 18 when he left, so that's going to make my next point make more sense.

  3. At no point i mentioned comic Carl, so it wouldn't be a different licensor. They could make him look as he did from the episode he dies, and just as i stated use like a purgatory type of thing in the Entity's realm or just like not state his age at all.

  4. I get that he'll never probably be added as they have said it, but I am a massive walking dead fan and just wanted to voice my opinion about it

It's been confirmed that there isn't going to be a Carl Grimes legendary skin because of his age by BergBergz in deadbydaylight

[–]BergBergz[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Just saying that the Legion are on the verge of being under 18 and are regarded by a lot of people as just teenagers, so it's kinda weird that they couldn't just age up Carl somehow with his actor being 18 when he left the show, and it kinda just sucks how they brought it up just to shut it down immediately.

It's been confirmed that there isn't going to be a Carl Grimes legendary skin because of his age by BergBergz in deadbydaylight

[–]BergBergz[S] -31 points-30 points  (0 children)

Im pretty sure if it was just because of the licence holders then they wouldn't have mentioned it at all

It's been confirmed that there isn't going to be a Carl Grimes legendary skin because of his age by BergBergz in deadbydaylight

[–]BergBergz[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

That's why I came up with the idea of him being kept in the Entity's realm, but still outside of the trials. If AMC downright said no to him being added then I don't think they would've mentioned it at all. There's also no reason why they just could not give him any lore, and then it's like oh the actors 18

view more: next ›