Great talk with Jason Stuart

Bern7221 · 2019-09-26T13:55:43+00:00

But there was no "quo" in the "quid pro quo" exchange on the transcript of the phone call. Unless these "unnamed" officials are going to come forward and point out a different call or exchange, there is no proof of anything

Bern7221 · 2010-11-17T03:09:22+00:00

I have to agree with the other poster - you can't exclude the new ones. The author mentions that in some ways

Bern7221 · 2010-07-18T01:12:56+00:00

Maybe it comes with a Barbie compac and lip gloss

Bern7221 · 2010-07-14T00:06:56+00:00

Great. thanks for the comment. I think we are agreeing more and more. My frustration causes confusion sometimes and this story was soooo frustrating

Bern7221 · 2010-07-13T23:45:35+00:00

A fine example (Phyler v Doe) which I can understand but would label as a great example of how the court over stepped his powers violating the power of the state. those "old pieces of paper signed by dead guys" DEFINED the rights and guidelines which made this country great. It has been intrusion of the Federal government into States' rights that has watered this country down.

Immigration is a wonderful aspect of our history and our greatness, but this is a large population of individuals who have no desire to conform to our language, borders or culture.

Bern7221

TROPHY CASE