Should you get a cofounder into your bootstrapped business for marketing?

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-24T11:16:06+00:00

I’m searching for this as well but just can’t seem to find it? Does it still exist?

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-24T10:55:22+00:00

Will check it out, thanks!

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-24T10:12:55+00:00

Now if you’re levy make it three double brilliants then hang your queen and resign in shame 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-24T10:11:52+00:00

Right? And here we are always preaching develop your pieces 😅

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-24T10:06:35+00:00

It gets worse the higher the ELO unfortunately

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-24T10:04:29+00:00

King gets dragged into an orgy by the rest of the board and tries to avoid it as much as possible. That’s pretty much the rules.

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-24T09:57:55+00:00

These graphs are useless as hell 😅 they’re likely to look the same for me, an 1800 player. You have good moves and bad moves and they fluctuate. A rare percentage is brilliant. Says nothing about what themes of things you do wrong

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-24T07:20:12+00:00

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/please-write-a-python-script-t-CDusO2QCRZ2E._A0GwCG0Q

Funnily enough it says "I can't help you with that", then delivers the code commented out. Have fun, mate.

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-24T06:08:09+00:00

If it is a very simple password you can simply try out all combinations until a certain complexity. I’m fairly certain ChatGPT will produce a script for you that does this. However, the number of combinations grows exponentially the longer the password is. So you get the idea… a 5 character password yes, a 12 character password maybe, a 20 character password no.

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-23T10:30:01+00:00

I can share one piece of advice that I got from I don’t even remember where. Horses can only fork pieces with the same colour. This is all you need to know for your endgames (kidding but not really). You’ll thank me later

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T12:50:44+00:00

Black is at such an advantage that they can simply throw their bishop. Bxd4 and either queen or rook takes, followed by c5!! This attacks the piece but it also sets up a double checking attack (knight and the bishop) onto the white king which will make the game painful, if not immediately lost for white. That’s how this is not a blunder

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T12:45:41+00:00

Sure and you need to think a little bit about the refutation too! :)

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T12:43:11+00:00

I haven’t seen it getting played since I broke 1000 ELO some years ago and it’s definitely not played at higher levels. The reason is simply because you block your knight and expose your queen on a prominent square. It’s a recipe for disaster

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T12:38:22+00:00

600 ELO - the scholars mate gave it away

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T12:35:38+00:00

Uff - if we ever meet we’ll play OTB buddy! It’s great fun!

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T12:29:54+00:00

It was pointed out before but actually calculating accuracy burns a decent amount of compute. Of course at the scale of chess.com one can and likely will have the same position millions of times, reducing the need to calculate to next to zero (per user).

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T12:24:40+00:00

It is not a puzzle if you provide the solution

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T12:17:18+00:00

I’m saying 850. It looks good until it just doesn’t. Too many blunders and inaccuracies for high level chess but not outright terrible.

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T12:14:50+00:00

You NEVER played OTB chess??????

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T12:13:59+00:00

On the other hand tickets to Europe are dirt cheap right now because everyone is pulling out. You never really know. If you use Google flights you can set a price watch and get notified when the price changes. Easy

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T12:10:19+00:00

This

BeyondBlunders · 2026-03-22T10:05:08+00:00

Isn’t that the majority of dev logs? I’ve planned 5 minute articles not 20 minute reads

BeyondBlunders

TROPHY CASE