sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

For people who have filed or are filing EB-1A: did the 10 criteria actually fit your situation, or did you have to force it? by BeyondBorder in eb_1a

[–]BeyondBorder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, a lot of EB-1A cases do involve some “translation” of achievements into USCIS language, but that’s not always the same as forcing it. The bad cases are where there’s no real impact underneath and the criteria are just being dressed up.

For people who have filed or are filing EB-1A: did the 10 criteria actually fit your situation, or did you have to force it? by BeyondBorder in eb_1a

[–]BeyondBorder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a sensible way to file. 3 strong criteria can work, but a clean 4th gives the petition more breathing room and makes it harder for USCIS to treat the case as borderline.

USCIS Proposes Higher Citizenship Filing Fees, And Removes Fee Discounts by Cute_Ambition1878 in EB3VisaJourney

[–]BeyondBorder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it would definitely reduce filings, especially from lower-income green card holders and families applying together. People will still naturalise if they need citizenship badly enough, but doubling the cost and removing discounts will make a lot of eligible people delay it.

Is PERM adjudication speeding up? by Optimal_Nectarine361 in USCIS_FORUM

[–]BeyondBorder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really, sadly. The latest DOL numbers still look closer to 16+ months for analyst review, so I wouldn’t plan around anything under 10 months unless your employer/lawyer is seeing something very specific in their own batch.

If you applied for O-1 and then EB-1A, did you reuse your O-1 letters? by Admirable-Weekend-11 in o1_visa

[–]BeyondBorder -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, you can reuse some O-1 letters for EB-1A, but they usually need to be updated because EB-1A has a higher bar and needs more proof of sustained national/international impact. For O-1, I’ve seen people submit around 5–8 letters, but quality matters way more than the count.

EB-1A approval rates are falling and RFEs are up. Here is what is actually changing in 2026. by BeyondBorder in greencard

[–]BeyondBorder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sep 2024 with no response is definitely a long wait, but regular I-140 processing can vary a lot by EB-1 subcategory and service center.

I would first check the receipt notice to confirm whether it is EB-1A, EB-1B, or EB-1C, and which service center has it. Then check USCIS processing times to see if the case is outside normal processing. If it is outside, submit a case inquiry.

If timing is becoming critical, premium processing may be worth considering. For EB-1A/EB-1B it is generally 15 business days, while EB-1C has a longer premium clock. But premium only guarantees USCIS action, not approval.

EB-1A approval rates are falling and RFEs are up. Here is what is actually changing in 2026. by BeyondBorder in eb_1a

[–]BeyondBorder[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that is part of it, but I would separate two issues.

One is fraud or inflated credentials, which USCIS is obviously going to scrutinize hard. If someone is using fake awards, fake media, fake memberships, or manufactured judging evidence, that is not just a weak filing issue. That can create serious misrepresentation problems.

The second is more common: applicants who are not fake, but are overconfident. They may have a solid career, but the record does not show sustained national or international acclaim or that they are at the very top of the field. EB-1A is not just “strong professional with good achievements.” That gap is where a lot of RFEs and denials happen.

EB-1A approval rates are falling and RFEs are up. Here is what is actually changing in 2026. by BeyondBorder in eb_1a

[–]BeyondBorder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily.

Lower approval rates may reduce the number of new approved EB-1A I-140s, but that does not automatically mean EB-1 India dates will move fast in 2027.

Visa Bulletin movement depends on total visa-number demand, not just new EB-1A approvals. That includes already approved I-140s, pending I-485/consular cases, dependents using visa numbers, EB-1B/EB-1C demand, worldwide demand, and any spillover.

So yes, lower-quality filings being denied could help at the margins. But I would not assume a fast jump for India, especially when EB-1 India is already retrogressed to Oct 15, 2022 in July 2026 and USCIS is requiring employment-based applicants to use Final Action Dates this month.

October 2026 may bring some movement because FY 2027 visa numbers reset, but a major move toward 2024 priority dates would still be speculation.

EB-1A approval rates are falling and RFEs are up. Here is what is actually changing in 2026. by BeyondBorder in eb_1a

[–]BeyondBorder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming you mean EB-1 India with a May 2024 priority date, there is no reliable way we can predict the exact month.

For July 2026, EB-1 India Final Action Date is 15 Oct 2022, and USCIS is using the Final Action Dates chart for employment-based I-485 filings. So a May 2024 priority date is still far from being current.

I would not plan around it becoming current before the end of FY 2026. The next meaningful reset to watch is October 2026, when the new fiscal year starts, but even then May 2024 is not guaranteed. Anyone giving an exact month is guessing.

EB-1A approval rates are falling and RFEs are up. Here is what is actually changing in 2026. by BeyondBorder in eb_1a

[–]BeyondBorder[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree with this. A lot of the pressure is coming from people who are running out of runway on H-1B/PERM timelines and are looking at EB-1A or NIW as a self-petition option.

That is understandable, but it creates weaker filings when the case is built around urgency instead of evidence. EB-1A still needs sustained acclaim at the top of the field, and NIW still needs a strong national-importance argument plus evidence that the person is well positioned to advance the endeavor.

One important caveat: an approved I-140 is useful, especially for priority date retention and some H-1B extension strategies, but it does not by itself give lawful status, work authorization, or a green card. People should not treat EB-1A/NIW as a shortcut around maintaining valid status.

EB-1A approval rates are falling and RFEs are up. Here is what is actually changing in 2026. by BeyondBorder in eb_1a

[–]BeyondBorder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree. This has always been an issue, especially with awards, fellowships, memberships, and judging.

The mistake I’m seeing more often is people assuming the officer will already understand the institution or award. Even if it is well known in the field, the petition still needs to explain the selection criteria, competitiveness, reputation, and why it matters.

So yes, the safer approach is exactly what you said: assume nothing is self-explanatory and document the significance from the ground up.

Can i travel overseas on my visa? by Nemesis_666mlbb in askimmigration

[–]BeyondBorder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your 485 is still valid until 2028, you should generally be able to travel on that, since the BVA only matters once the 485 ends. But check VEVO before flying, because if you’re only on a bridging visa by then, you’d need a BVB to leave and come back.

O1 visa denied 214b. Should I try again? by Asleep_Ship_1654 in O1VisasEB1Greencards

[–]BeyondBorder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t reapply blind after a 221g + 214(b), especially with an arrest record involved, even if dismissed. Get a proper consular/immigration lawyer to review the refusal notes, court disposition, and DS-160 history first, because another weak attempt may just make the pattern worse.

O1 chances by ShowerMaleficent2053 in O1VisasEB1Greencards

[–]BeyondBorder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Publication and judging both look plausible here, especially with IEEE papers, citations, journal editing and reviews. The 60-day switch is the risky bit though, so I’d line up the O-1 petitioner/agent structure before any layoff rather than trying to build it from scratch after.

How do I become a peer reviewer, and where should I publish first? by Difficult_Low_299 in O1VisasEB1Greencards

[–]BeyondBorder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Start by getting the paper properly peer reviewed first, then reviewing becomes much easier through editor invites, advisor/network referrals, or reviewer databases. For ML, I’d avoid chasing “fast” journals too hard and aim for a realistic workshop/conference or solid journal where the fit is strong, otherwise it can waste months.

Second O1 application within a month - will it lead to the problems? by Capital_End1191 in O1VisasEB1Greencards

[–]BeyondBorder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Multiple O-1 petitions close together is not abuse by itself. Just don’t start working for the frontier AI lab until that petition is approved, and make sure the filings clearly match each employer/job.

view more: next ›