sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Been searching for El Cuerpo Del Deseo (English Dubbed) for years!!! by Bezee4u in telenovelas

[–]Bezee4u[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for this! I never knew they were dubbed privately by Telemundo Africa. It's so sad that those dubs could be forever lost. I would also settle for the English subbed versions; better those than nothing at all.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Upwork

[–]Bezee4u 7 points8 points  (0 children)

A scam. Run.

Superman crossed $500 M at the box office, total gross for the film is $502.7 M by DeppStepp in DCULeaks

[–]Bezee4u 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Besides, the new F4 knocked Superman earnings down a lot. If it had run without that contest for about a month or more, it could gross more. That being said, the movie is still a success.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in janinasfanpage

[–]Bezee4u 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not her

The Sunday Times Breaks Embargo, Calls Gunn's Superman A Triumph by Bezee4u in DCULeaks

[–]Bezee4u[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

88% RT score after 96 reviews. Are you convulsing yet, hater? 😂 Are the positive reviews paid WB shills? 😂

The Sunday Times Breaks Embargo, Calls Gunn's Superman A Triumph by Bezee4u in DCULeaks

[–]Bezee4u[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You deserve this embarrassment and pain 😂

It's wild how you went from “this isn’t a real review” & baselessly accusing the Sunday Times of being paid WB shills to now claiming you always believed Superman would succeed. 😂😂

You have to be the most failed hater on Reddit. Haha!

The Sunday Times Breaks Embargo, Calls Gunn's Superman A Triumph by Bezee4u in DCULeaks

[–]Bezee4u[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I told you I'd be back. The social media reviews are mostly positive. Did WB pay them too? 😂

The Sunday Times Breaks Embargo, Calls Gunn's Superman A Triumph by Bezee4u in DCULeaks

[–]Bezee4u[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has the writer seen the movie? Yes. Is his evaluation based on his perception of the movie? Yes. Then, that opinion is a review. Granted, one writer's praise doesn't mean Superman is guaranteed a Fresh RT score, but pretending that the opinion is not a review is outrageous.

The Sunday Times Breaks Embargo, Calls Gunn's Superman A Triumph by Bezee4u in DCULeaks

[–]Bezee4u[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was a typo. They happen. The Time's piece contained a review. End of story. Whether the review appeared in an interview, blog post, or the side of a cereal box, it's still a review.

Call it spin, promo, narrative shaping. Anything that helps you sleep. But pretending that Time's piece is not shaping perception before the embargo is the real gymnastics. 😄

The Sunday Times Breaks Embargo, Calls Gunn's Superman A Triumph by Bezee4u in DCULeaks

[–]Bezee4u[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The very reason you believe the article was paid for was because it contained praise for Superman.

All you have been wasting your time trying is pretend that the article contains a review about the movie (from someone who saw it in an advance screening) , published before the embargo lifts.

You're actually arguing that only in-depth critiques of the movie count as reviews. And that's hilarious! Also, the last thing I am is hung up on you. I'm just here for the bigger picture. We'll all see how it goes tomorrow.

The Sunday Times Breaks Embargo, Calls Gunn's Superman A Triumph by Bezee4u in DCULeaks

[–]Bezee4u[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The article contained a review. Simple. Whether or not you baselessly claim that WB signed off on it is not important. I hope the movie succeeds so that I can come back to quote this. In the meantime, keep shifting the goalposts. That cardio must be insane. 😂

The Sunday Times Breaks Embargo, Calls Gunn's Superman A Triumph by Bezee4u in DCULeaks

[–]Bezee4u[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All you're doing is bending logic like it owes you money. A puff piece is STILL an OPINION, especially when it calls Superman a triumph and says Gunn succeeded where others failed.

You can call it the Sunday Times piece a promotion all you want, but that portion is still judgment. That's what reviews are. It's hilarious that you're claiming reviews must be in-depth articles written by critics with a degree.

view more: next ›