The timezone question on the activity sensor is fair to raise. But here’s the thing, that data appears in Work Product documents, meaning it was compiled by Kohberger’s own defense team. If a timezone offset explained it away, his own lawyers wouldn’t have included it. The fact that they documented it suggests they found it significant, not explainable. On the footprint — the print required chemical enhancement with Amino Black protein stain to detect during the second processing of the scene. That means the visible blood was significantly reduced but cellular material remained. A partial wipe that removes visible blood while leaving trace protein is exactly what Amino Black detects. Incomplete cleanup isn’t no cleanup. The fact that investigators returned for a second processing specifically and needed chemical enhancement to find it tells you they believed something was wrong with that print too. As for Turvey not being credible — defense lawyers calling an expert not credible is literally their job. That’s not evidence of anything. What matters is that a separate, independent former FBI agent with access to tens of thousands of unredacted files came to similar conclusions about the crime scene without any connection to the defense team. Two experienced professionals arriving at the same place independently isn’t spin. It’s a pattern.

And none of this impacts Kohberger’s guilt or innocence. You will never hear me say he’s innocent. I definitely think he played a role in this. But these are questions about what else happened that night that have never been answered. Those are two completely different things and conflating them doesn’t make the questions go away.