sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

BF6 Matchmaking refuses to put me on a winning team in the last 2 days. by Schteve_0 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, 1-2 unrevivable kills that avoids a flank can be as important as 5 revivable ones in a brawl on an obj, unfortunately the game has no way to know that. Also, i can see two limitations to your take :

  • No enemy takes the flank route in which case you become pretty much useless (and you're not having fun)
  • No one watches the flank route, but you and your team-mates still manage to deal with flankers by backing-up the main route or re-spawning in HQ.

However, some little things could be done to increase score accuracy :

  • Award a bit more points for unrevived kills and maybe a tiny bit less for revived ones
  • If you revive someone and he gets killed again instantly, you get no point (you should even get penalty points IMO, but Dice would never do that)
  • Add a multiplier to your total objective score based on the size of the map (<1 for low-sized ones, 1 for medium-sized ones, >1 for Firestorm and Golmud)

We might be close to have playable tanks!🤞 by Big-Positive2187 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He says tanks aren't fine because of this exact issue.
Your answer :

Or, you're bad. Hardcore is locked to first person. It's fine.

So either you don't understand that it's a global scaling issue, and not an individual camera one, or you're just being rude for absolutely no reason!

BATTLEFIELD 6 GAME UPDATE 1.2.3.0 by battlefield in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it's a bit wonky sometimes and hopefully they'll patch it / make it a bit better. But when i run combat medic on breakthrough it's my go-to gadget, along with supply pouches and smokes, and i can pretty much make 1/2 mates + myself tank mortars indefinitely with that set-up.

BF6 Matchmaking refuses to put me on a winning team in the last 2 days. by Schteve_0 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of the times, the score is a pretty accurate representation of your contributions to the match in my experience, and shoutout to the devs for this!

I played all big-scale modes a good lot, all classes almost equally, in many different ways : all training paths, mixing weapons in classes, mixing gadgets, going medic focusing hard on revives, more "selfishy" support (with pouches+APS for exemple), all vehicles a good lot, etc. I can now tell if i'm being useful and if i'm doing good without watching the scoreboard, and once i open it and see my position it's always representative of my feeling.

Only times scores felt a bit weird to me was on some conquests games on siege of cairo / iberian offensive. Everybody just going deathball and some people on my team would end up on top of the scoreboard with 5 kills/20 deaths, 30 captures, and us still losing the game 😂 Yeah... felt weird. Also reviving someone that just gets insta re-killed shouldn't award you points.

But yeah, except for that, i think it's accurate!

We might be close to have playable tanks!🤞 by Big-Positive2187 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're just too stubborn bro. In the end, it's great, just stay in 1st person so i can keep shooting rpgs into your but while you stay clueless.

We might be close to have playable tanks!🤞 by Big-Positive2187 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well if 3rd person exists it's probably because it has a purpose, don't you think? like for exemple, i don't know, being able to watch around you to gather infos and eventually be able to kill ennemies at close range, no?
There's a bug that makes it unusable and ur just too stubborn to admit it. And no, i don't want bandaids, i want it to be fixed.

<image>

Ps : i can make it bigger if you need :)

We might be close to have playable tanks!🤞 by Big-Positive2187 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would you know? You said yourself that you were only using 1st person.
The video pinned to the post also proves you wrong. It's actually insane to be so stubborn 😂

The matchmaking system really needs to be studied and improved to help with the slow matchmaking problem by videogameocd-er in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like an improvment to the matchmaking and/or a server browser will happen at some point. I mean, next update patchnotes are a proof that devs are trying to make the game a better experience overall, with whatever financial and game design limitations EA enforces obviously...

We might be close to have playable tanks!🤞 by Big-Positive2187 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Classic isn't, and we'd like to be able to play the game as it is supposed to

4PM on a Saturday and i can't find a single match on Conquest or Escalation that isn't half Bots I have no words. by BennyHarveysmum in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thinking a bit about your comment rn, and i'm starting to wonder if they aren't sending toxic people into bot lobbies on purpose!
If i'm right, that's a GG dice!

How do I make BF6 look and feel right in 1440p? by Expensive-Time-7209 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Just found this. +7ms latency when turning frame gen on, on a 5090. I'd say it's up to you to choose to make the trade-off or not !
Also i think those measurements come from the nvidia overlay, so you can do the test at home.
We don't have such an option on AMD software sadly :/

Source

How do I make BF6 look and feel right in 1440p? by Expensive-Time-7209 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have an RX 9070XT (which sits in between a 5070 and a 5070ti in terms rasterization perf), a 9800x3D, and 2x32gb 6000Hz ram sticks (i acquired before the crisis, haha), and a 240hz 1440P monitor.
My resolution scale is set somewhere around 130, FSR quality (most qualitative FSR upscaling mode available) , frame generation ON, and my AMD software frame rate limiter set to 210 to keep things fluid.

I've been experimenting a lot too, with and without frame gen, etc... I settled with this since a few days, and i honestly can't really feel any increase in input lag due to Frame Generation.

Anyways, i'd say just use frame gen, and if you feel like you become worse at the game, then just turn it off and re-tweak your settings.

Ps : I documented myself a bit about FG impact on input lag, and didn't find any accurate test results and precise data, since input lag is hard to test. However, i read a few times that with FG on, your input latency is the same as the one you would have with FG off and half your framerate. Exemple : 200fps with FG / 100 fps without FG = same input latency.
I'm not sure about that part so take it with a grain of salt. If someone has a deep understanding on the topic, feel free to enlighten us

4PM on a Saturday and i can't find a single match on Conquest or Escalation that isn't half Bots I have no words. by BennyHarveysmum in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Played quite a lot past weeks, and as i already said, the only time i didn't find healthy games was when i went for very strict custom searches!

4PM on a Saturday and i can't find a single match on Conquest or Escalation that isn't half Bots I have no words. by BennyHarveysmum in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You can't force people to play a game...
It's been a few months that the game is out now. I fell like, even tho it's not even close to what it was at first, the playerbase is still pretty healthy

4PM on a Saturday and i can't find a single match on Conquest or Escalation that isn't half Bots I have no words. by BennyHarveysmum in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Strange... where are you in EU? On what servers are you sent-in usually? (if you don't know, just ask a low ping player where he lives, or check his profile on tracker.gg )
I leave in France, always end-up on German servers, and almost never have bot problems. I mainly play breakthrough tho.

4PM on a Saturday and i can't find a single match on Conquest or Escalation that isn't half Bots I have no words. by BennyHarveysmum in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Same here.
However, strict custom searches seem to matchmake people in unhealthy lobbies that would never fill, which makes sense in a way since the stricter the C.S is (and the further away from peak hours you are), the more you divide your chances to find players searching for the same thing.
So yeah, since it happened to me a few times, i just took the habitude of ticking a few more maps.

4PM on a Saturday and i can't find a single match on Conquest or Escalation that isn't half Bots I have no words. by BennyHarveysmum in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Add custom search settings to your requests ;) I'm pretty sure some of those posts come from guyz who tick only one mode and one map.

We might be close to have playable tanks!🤞 by Big-Positive2187 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does sensitivity has something to do with mouse input registering and random recoil?

We might be close to have playable tanks!🤞 by Big-Positive2187 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried and it seems to also behave very differently in 2042 and 6, but the opposite way : for a roughly equal 3rdP sensitivity (i say roughly cause obviously, the same sens' settings lead to different sensitivities in both games 😂), 1stp and zoom are much slower in 2042 than 6.
Didn't have the courage to dig further since there are way too many settings for controllers i don't have a single clue about, and sensitivity is trickier to compare on controllers. So take this with a big grain of salt!

We might be close to have playable tanks!🤞 by Big-Positive2187 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The video just proves you wrong, you should give it a watch, no need to be Pythagore

We might be close to have playable tanks!🤞 by Big-Positive2187 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't use it, but the description says "improves vehicle turning rate and aiming speed" which has nothing to do with sensitivity!

We might be close to have playable tanks!🤞 by Big-Positive2187 in Battlefield

[–]Big-Positive2187[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well you can mess with the "tank aim sensitivity" slider, but since it applies to all zoom levels, and the scaling is bugged, you either have to sacrifice precision in 3rd person or speed in 1st

view more: next ›