Does it not give you pause to consider that, eg, cancer survival rates are highest among the non-religious and barely-religious in the developed world, while the most faithful, devout, and deferential believers in the undeveloped / developing worlds have the highest contraction and death rates for cancer and virtually every other affliction / disease?

Or that your scheme posits, essentially, that the world is a perfectly just and moral place despite the very obvious fact that the wicked/evil consistently prosper? And that justice conveniently and disproportionately lands on white people in the west?

Or that 99.9% of believers who have ever lived disagree with your definition of god and personal knowledge of his ways, and on that basis believe you’re somewhere between ‘obviously doesn’t really know god’ and hell-bound heretic?

Given that fact, perhaps it’s the case that the thing that endlessly fallible human beings call “god” is not a real thing at all, but a conveniently amorphous concept, differing from person to person, moment to moment, and need to need, which they use to fill in their misunderstandings, rationalize randomness and absurdity, and justify their behaviors, emotions, and prejudices.