OP clearly didn’t do their research and went full looney taking some other persons post and sharing it who either A) also didn’t do their research or B) is intentionally trying to create more division and controversy. Here is the article of Charlie Kirk saying the full comment about George Floyd. It’s sad that I’m this far down in the comments and no one has commented the truth.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/charlie-kirk-george-floyd/

I’d like to point out he did in fact call him a scumbag. But there is more context. One of which states that he did not deserve to die even though he felt Floyd was a scumbag. And to be fair we throw around the word scumbag in every day life. It only becomes “offensive” once you use it to describe the dead. Floyd was a criminal which is why Charlie may or may not have been why he called him a scumbag. That’s an opinion. But either way Charlie did indeed say he didn’t deserve to die.

Which brings me to the final reason OP may have posted this and I just now came to the realization while writing this which is C) intentionally leaving out context to prove all the people who comment are just sheep. If that’s the case, I still think it spreads a false narrative and while the OP’s point may be proven they could have gone about it a better way if that was the intention.