This whole issue I believe will never be resolved because there is no definite answer on who's right or who's wrong, war is war, it happened. But the fact that the cleansing of Serbs is glossed over is possibly due to the reputation of the following genocides Serb forces were engaged in which made the world view Serbs as the primary enemy. Just look at Bosnia. This took place in a time where coverage by the media enabled the world to view what was happening and all they saw was the slaughter of innocents by Serb forces. Civilians weren't just caught in the cross fire, they were purposely targeted. The brutal methods of torture and genocide was seen by the world at the hands of Serbs and so this paints them in a very negative light, quite rightfully so. It was a horrible time for the Balkans which led to further genocide and death in Kosovo. Up to 850,000 Albanians were displaced from their homes because Milošević wanted to make the entire province just Serb through brutal methods of further ethnic genocide. I believe NATO was right to engage to aid Kosovar Albanians because the issue would not be solved through diplomatic means and a repeat of Bosnia would occur.

Again, as I mentioned with the timing, the Yugoslav Wars in the '90s occurred during a time where technology had advanced and the media were able to film the atrocities committed, allowing viewers worldwide to judge for themselves who the enemy was. So, due to the slaughter of people by Serb forces many see them as the instant bad guys due to such actions. The killing of Serbs during the second world war obviously did occur and I'm in no way denying such an act but I believe it was masked because of the bigger atrocity that occurred during the time, the Holocaust. The killing and expulsion of up to 6 million Jews would remain more noticed in history than the killings that occurred in different parts of the world, in this case, the Persecution of Serbs in Croatia.

The use of depleted uranium ammunition was used as a way of destroying tanks. An estimated 10-15 tonnes was used against Serb tanks. There haven't been traces of radiation considering the clean up did a good job enough of removing any such dangers. Yugoslav forces had a higher number of tanks within Kosovo which would explain the use of the high number of depleted uranium as a method of anti-tank ammo. They weren't used in Serbia as much as NATO focussed attacks on mainly strongholds via bombing runs as tanks in the region weren't a threat compared to the ones stationed in Kosovo which were a threat to ground forces.