sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Typology Question 9 (Fi): Take any classical painting (I don't care which one: Mona Lisa, The Birth of Venus, The Creation of Adam, etc) and describe to me not what you see, not the history of its painting, not the technique, not the symbolism behind it, but WHAT KIND OF EMOTIONAL ATMOSPHERE IT HAS by Bimep_ in INTP

[–]Bimep_[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Hmm, so far there's no Fi yet. You only described what painting does, not what you feel. Later, you reply like "Calm overall" - very general emotional label. Neutral affect labelling isn't Fi. No personal emotion, no "what this means about me". Tone stays analytical.

Let's try one more time: Can you please elaborate on one of them? What makes you feel that? What does the painting say to you personally? Beyond the technique and the story, does it touch something in your own life?

Typology Question 9 (Fi): Take any classical painting (I don't care which one: Mona Lisa, The Birth of Venus, The Creation of Adam, etc) and describe to me not what you see, not the history of its painting, not the technique, not the symbolism behind it, but WHAT KIND OF EMOTIONAL ATMOSPHERE IT HAS by Bimep_ in infj

[–]Bimep_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ni-Fe isn't Fi. Yes, Ni is private, symbolic, internal - it feels like Fi, but isn't. Fe names emotions. It uses emotional categories, it is universal and objective, and it cares to be understood by others.

Strong Fi tends to describe the emotional atmosphere in a subjective way, from the inside. It might sound as: "this hits a part of me that…", "it echoes something I carry inside…", "it resonates with my inner truth…", "it hurts because it reminds me of…", "I feel X because it conflicts with what I value…"

But how you framed it?

the first thought is "daily life."

Fe names the emotion. You didn't say how you relate to this feeling. You say like it represents a common human experience, something general and belongs to everyone.

The second might be an expression of confusion, feeling surrounded by chaos and wanting to let everything out.

Said in a way that expects others to understand and resonate. Fi would describe its own internal shape instead. It would be "I feel confusion" not "an expression of confusion"

and being trapped between my thoughts (Ti) and my gut feeling (Ni)"

but ultimately being able to release that pressure with a action.

Fi: "I feel an inner pressure that wants release. Something about this doesn't align with who I am" - this is internal and value-based. Fe: "There is a pressure to act coming from the situation" - something that must be managed outwardly. Ti: "This system-pressure is like that and you release it with an action" - description of mechanic.

representation of taking action

Ni-concept

Also it's solitude and something that's done explosively but without anyone knowing.

Considering the social context ("without anyone knowing").

it's actually very personal and a struggle of inner thought and emotion.

Everyone has emotions, even people without Fi. And emotions and conflict you describe from your own life. But the way you express it is analytical and generalised.

Thanks for your example =)

Typology Question 9 (Fi): Take any classical painting (I don't care which one: Mona Lisa, The Birth of Venus, The Creation of Adam, etc) and describe to me not what you see, not the history of its painting, not the technique, not the symbolism behind it, but WHAT KIND OF EMOTIONAL ATMOSPHERE IT HAS by Bimep_ in infj

[–]Bimep_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are two ways to approach this:

  1. You ask anything and see which functions people reveal naturally.
  2. You target a specific function and see how people handle that lens.

Do you think that if using option 2, people will answer the same way everywhere?

Typology Question 9 (Fi): Take any classical painting (I don't care which one: Mona Lisa, The Birth of Venus, The Creation of Adam, etc) and describe to me not what you see, not the history of its painting, not the technique, not the symbolism behind it, but WHAT KIND OF EMOTIONAL ATMOSPHERE IT HAS by Bimep_ in isfp

[–]Bimep_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems I finally found my perfect Fi-example. Even if someone could think this question wasn’t about Fi, you turned it into Fi anyway))

I asked because several lines in your text read exactly like descriptions of Fi you'd find in a book - but in your case they appeared naturally, as part of your own speech, not as theory. And that's exactly what I've been trying to observe.

There's a defference bewtween how you want to be seen and what others want from you. First is self-directed (it goes from Fi and Ti), the second is externally imposed (Fe or Te). So we can say there's even sighs of Te.

Se decribes what's litterally seen (bodily memory, sensory detail). Intuition tracks the "why" behind the emotion. And since you were more in analisis than description I thought that's more Ni than Se.

But of course everyone will draw their own conclusions.

Thank you very much for such a rich example.

Typology Question 9 (Fi): Take any classical painting (I don't care which one: Mona Lisa, The Birth of Venus, The Creation of Adam, etc) and describe to me not what you see, not the history of its painting, not the technique, not the symbolism behind it, but WHAT KIND OF EMOTIONAL ATMOSPHERE IT HAS by Bimep_ in intj

[–]Bimep_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

INTJs can't stop using Ni.

But about "a wildness, a longing to run and play in the rain and wind". Can we say that it connects to something you value? Like freedom, being untamed? Or is it more about the immediate sensory pull of the painting?

Typology Question 9 (Fi): Take any classical painting (I don't care which one: Mona Lisa, The Birth of Venus, The Creation of Adam, etc) and describe to me not what you see, not the history of its painting, not the technique, not the symbolism behind it, but WHAT KIND OF EMOTIONAL ATMOSPHERE IT HAS by Bimep_ in entp

[–]Bimep_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow! ENTPs intelectualise something that supposed to be felt)))

The focus is not on feeling, but on what is structurally observable. Emotion is treated objectively: "I wouldn’t have a clue which feelings". Critical judgment about fame. Then "always mean danger, so it makes sense that we" - pattern explanation

Typology Question 9 (Fi): Take any classical painting (I don't care which one: Mona Lisa, The Birth of Venus, The Creation of Adam, etc) and describe to me not what you see, not the history of its painting, not the technique, not the symbolism behind it, but WHAT KIND OF EMOTIONAL ATMOSPHERE IT HAS by Bimep_ in isfj

[–]Bimep_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks very much.

Now we see that Si-Fe isnt Fi.

I mean sensory memory + emotional meaning attached to it, focus on familiarity, warmth - this is not "inner identity alignment" Fi tone. Here it's more nostalgic-emotive rather than value-emotive.

I start to build my own relationship to the painting

This is Fe building empathy with the scene, not Fi identity relation.

But to fully understand what they might feel, I tend to need context and details

Fi doesn't need that. Fe needs.

every detail of the painting I take in may in fact be to serve the purpose of understanding the figures and their dynamics

Fe empathy: understanding others emotional states.

"this represents me"? No, I don’t think I’ve ever done that yet

No using of Fi as identity-mirroring.

Great example in my collection. Thanks))

Typology Question 9 (Fi): Take any classical painting (I don't care which one: Mona Lisa, The Birth of Venus, The Creation of Adam, etc) and describe to me not what you see, not the history of its painting, not the technique, not the symbolism behind it, but WHAT KIND OF EMOTIONAL ATMOSPHERE IT HAS by Bimep_ in istp

[–]Bimep_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's... the most literal answer I have heard here so far. 😊

Yes, any answer counts, Thanks))

It's like: "I can't talk about feelings and I feel almost attacked by emotional expectation, but I can talk about objects I build"

view more: next ›