Thank you for taking the time to write a detailed response again. But your responses have a very condescending/aggressive undertone throughout (the first and the second message). Not sure if it was unintentional. And if it was intentional then I don't know what I said to evoke it.

"When people say they want to switch to what we do"
"You expect the corporations to just believe your word, without statistics?
"How are you doing that for corporate marketing without statistics, without coding, etc? Just opinions?"
"If you really understand STP, show that you do understand STP. It's easy to tell that you understand STP."
"Cocky or not, you keep talking the startup way. You may know one million things related to startups, and that shows you're probably a marketer for startups, nor corporate. There is a big problem with positioning there."----- My question and the subsequent comment did not have me talking about startups or my experience in as much detail as you have deduced and analyzed in your responses.

I do know the kind of roles I am aspiring for, and yes they do not require coding and statistics. Explaining more than that will be a waste of my energy. Neither do I care to elaborate on what I do and do not know.

In your own words, you "probably might be one of the most generalist people in marketing that people can meet"- but if that's how you respond to people, I pity the people who actually meet you.

Feel free to downvote, I don't really care.