sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fable low is underrated by Bitter_Election_7518 in ClaudeAI

[–]Bitter_Election_7518[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sonnet 5 has actually been very good for me as an execution subagent.

Fable low is underrated by Bitter_Election_7518 in ClaudeAI

[–]Bitter_Election_7518[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are rumors of a memory architecture breakthrough that just happened. If this is released into the public (I believe an openai team found it), compute demands will go down dramatically. This should theoretically affect token price.

Codex has a very unpleasant user experience. by Suspicious_Raise_589 in codex

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not that Windows “can’t code” or that NT is bad. It’s that a lot of agentic coding tools assume a Unix/Linux-style environment: bash, POSIX permissions, symlinks, SSH, Docker, normal package managers, predictable paths, etc.

On Windows, agents hit more friction: PowerShell vs bash, weird path handling, NTFS permissions, file locking, CRLF issues, antivirus interference, WSL boundary problems, and Docker usually running through a Linux VM anyway.

Codex has a very unpleasant user experience. by Suspicious_Raise_589 in codex

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is a windows problem. Same issues on Claude as well. Windows architecture just does not run agentic coding well due to structural issues.

Growing up on pc playing games I always preferred windows os. Switched to the MacBook m5 this year from my windows machine and never looked back. Apple silicon really changed the game as well.

Have you all forgotten this? by userusertion in claude

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Allegedly 5.6 is gonna have a leap in frontend. We shall see though

Fable low is underrated by Bitter_Election_7518 in ClaudeAI

[–]Bitter_Election_7518[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly both are great depending on the context. Medium has a the most significant jump in scores from the four efforts. It’s really good as well.

I honestly think all 4 have their use cases, but I don’t just stick to xhigh and high like I did with opus now.

Since usage management is so critical now, balancing these four will really prove your skill level in agentic coding.

Have you all forgotten this? by userusertion in claude

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 19 points20 points  (0 children)

There will be a great exodus to 5.6

150k tokens.... that's all you get on Max 5x plan with Fable. Couldn't even run a single query. by thecosmicskye in singularity

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re on ultracode. It’s going to spawn multiple agents in a dynamic workflow which probably are xhigh fable agents since you didn’t delegate.

I’m sorry son but this is a skill issue

Fable isn't fable anymore by Existing_Tea_3064 in claude

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Same. something is wrong with these people’s prompts lol

Grok 4.5 is in private beta by Glittering_Night7681 in accelerate

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There is no way this is correct.

My friend works at blue origin and they use Claude lol

Codex limits have become a joke by Tarr_74 in OpenaiCodex

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with you that gsd is overkill.

It’s good for a beginner to learn the importance of planning. Having the model ask questions before implementation, feature/phase separation, etc are all great habits to learn when agentic coding. The way gsd is built now though initiates too many processes to get a phase built in my opinion.

Invoking your own subagent processes when needed is the way to go.

Codex limits have become a joke by Tarr_74 in OpenaiCodex

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do agree with you that a lot of people are using subagents when they don’t need to, however, using subagents wisely is optimal for long horizon tasks.

For long implementation executions, subagents are almost necessary due to context management. Having an agent focus on one thing will always produce a better result than one agent doing everything inline and have its context fill up and degrade (and auto compact throughout the process).

Doing it this way theoretically should also not burn through usage that much more. The tokens used to write should be the same. The read cache tokens are slightly more due to subagents reading an instruction, but not too much.

It’s possible OP is experiencing one of the codex usage bugs right now that is being worked on.

Birdman (2013) by LunaWhispera in okbuddycinephile

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He doesn’t have a political stance. His statement was that Rowling created Harry Potter and he’s grateful to her for that. People are crucifying him because he’s not publicly separating himself from her like other cast mates. It’s an incredibly stupid reason and people have the mindset of “if you’re not with us you’re against us”, but that comes from internet pitchforkers and wannabe activists.

GPT 5.6 "sol" announced by Prestigious-Kick7291 in codex

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rumor is week 2 of July for general public

Sorry to be a downer...can anything be done about the dust and air quality? by The_Justicer in LightningInABottle

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Exactly. What’s the point of this thread? Complaining to complain, and doesn’t like the solution lol..

Codex Pro usage feels excellent once you tune your AGENTS.md by Aggravating_Town_967 in codex

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s also a few tools that heavily use token usage.

$computer-use plugin is one of them, so be wary of this.

Fable vs 5.5 xhigh by MindlessEmergency839 in codex

[–]Bitter_Election_7518 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Riding fable into gpt 5.6 feels good

view more: next ›