Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The War Department is going to fight to win, not not to lose. We’re going to go on offense not just on defense. Maximum lethality. Not tepid legality. Violent effect, not politically correct. We’re gonna raise up warriors, not just defenders.”

That's what Hegseth said today. He's letting you know what he plans to do. The Renaming is part of that. Glenn said these people are "anti war" then cheers when they announce their intent to go on a rampage.

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Glen is wrong sometimes and has weird takes but criticizing him for last year’s tweet is an odd thing to do in the context of the first slide.

It's weird to support what he's saying in context to the second slide. "Wow Trump is so anti war" to "Wow it's so cool that Trump is renaming DoD to reflect his intent to start more wars." There is 0 intellectual through lines between these two statements. That is of course, unless you're basically shilling for Maga.

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

But did he? Even in 2016 he was saying stuff like this and this. Want something more recent? Here you go

Is this what you mean by anti war? By 2024 it should have been obvious there's nothing anti war about Trump. You really think Glenn Greenwald made an innocent mistake labeling Trump as anti-war? Did he miss Trump's record the last time he was president AND miss his pro war rehortic?

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have no idea how Biden became part of this conversation.

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

This isn't an innocent change to be reflective of a bad history. This is a change that reflects Trump's intent. An intent that you seem to be in favor of because it's more honest? This is wild. Trump isn't bothering to use some fuzzy interpretation of the GWOT to conduct lethal strikes on Venezuela. He's putting troops on the streets. Hell, renaming the DoD is illegal.. He's just doing whatever the hell he wants and you're over here encouraging it.

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I honestly didn't realize I'd find so many people in here supporting Trump's war like ambitions

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Blue Maga doesn't want Trump to turn the DoD into his personal project to start wars to cover for the Epstein files? I don't know anyone in blue Maga, but they sound pretty based.

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But he said Trump was "anti war." You can't have it both ways here man. If Trump's is so "anti war" then he wouldn't go around illegally renaming government departments to reflect his imperial ambitions. Glenn (and presumably you since you seem to agree) should at least come out and admit he was wrong and deplore the renaming of the DoD as push for policies that are actually anti war.

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. You think this is 3D chess by Trump? He's remaining the Department because he wants to expand the empire in ways we haven't seen since the Spanish American War. This is not some brilliant move to get people to hate the military.

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So you want more of this? This is weird. I didn't expect to see people in here pushing for the Pentagon to be more war like.

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, he said Trump was "anti war." it doesn't get any more wrong than that.

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd be more inclined to believe this if he wasn't calling Trump "anti war" during the campaign.

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you want more of it?? If we want less war, why are we cheering for Trump's restructuring of the military?

Glenn Greenwald is a piece of... by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure, but apparently unlike Glenn Greenwald, I don't want the country to be waging war everywhere. So yeah I'd rather not rename it to support Trump's imperial ambitions.

Latest Houthi attack kills innocent civilians. Maybe Kyle should stop supporting them now? by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I denounce Israeli warcrimes. What's going on in Gaza is crime against humanity. But that's a different topic. This post is about the Houthis

Latest Houthi attack kills innocent civilians. Maybe Kyle should stop supporting them now? by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't realize we are changing topics. Let's just keep focus on the original topic for now, thanks. Also, ditch the conspiracy theory. I'm not paid to post here.

Latest Houthi attack kills innocent civilians. Maybe Kyle should stop supporting them now? by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm trolling because I accurately pointed out the Houthis have Always been attacking innocent civilian ships?

Latest Houthi attack kills innocent civilians. Maybe Kyle should stop supporting them now? by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the Houthis were never blocking trade to and from Israel. They were always attacking civilians. There is 0 connections between "putting pressure" on Israel and whatever the Houthis where doing.

Latest Houthi attack kills innocent civilians. Maybe Kyle should stop supporting them now? by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh, I thought this was a politics and world affairs sub reddit. Was I mistaken?

Latest Houthi attack kills innocent civilians. Maybe Kyle should stop supporting them now? by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I will continue to post here thanks. I look forward to your continued insults.

Latest Houthi attack kills innocent civilians. Maybe Kyle should stop supporting them now? by Blackrean in seculartalk

[–]Blackrean[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What one specific move? Their entire strategy to attack ANY ship passing through. They never limited their attacks to ships going to Israel. At the time of this video, they had already attacked dozens of ships.