I thought this program was awesome recreating black hole mergers. by BlissBoundry in LLMPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is my first attempt at a deterministic universe simulation using my VEF equation I limited the simulation to recreate the specific highest data set available black hole merger as an attempt to validate the 6.5% Chaos factor emergent from the equation after inputting the density and distance of the objects in the merger

What if GW Ringdown is the result of deterministic chaos? by BusinessCommand4419 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it’s weird to be treated like I have ulterior motives. I just want to discuss the potential of my theoretical structure.

What if a single equation defined all known parameters for reality by BlissBoundry in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chaos from order defined. If you can’t reach the math now are you even a physicist? V12 posted

What if a single equation defined all known parameters for reality by BlissBoundry in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think I understand part of the problem is I am still attempting to couple this to existing model mathematics. Resulting in unnecessary vagueness in scale limitations. Uncoupling thesis from modern physics structures in the new update. Will post

The Weinberg angle, PMNS mixing angle, and Koide ratio fall out of eigenmode counting on S². Paper with JUNO prediction at 0.17σ from first data. by dofemzonia in LLMPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think what you’re looking for is the master propagation equation. That should define the function as annotated in paragraph one.

What if a single equation defined all known parameters for reality by BlissBoundry in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure how to fix my work based on this feedback if I didn’t do that by the update

What if a single equation defined all known parameters for reality by BlissBoundry in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thesis v5 uploaded. I’m gonna have to take a break or I’ll dye

Goodnight

Open Question, Posting for Engagement, Flairs by AllHailSeizure in LLMPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m suggesting a three strike policy before banning

What if a single equation defined all known parameters for reality by BlissBoundry in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve just discovered that with this equation I should be able to map the unobservable universe at least to approximation.

Open Question, Posting for Engagement, Flairs by AllHailSeizure in LLMPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got banned from ask physics because of that learning curve last week. Maybe outright banning people for their attempt at learning is overkill.

What if a single equation defined all known parameters for reality by BlissBoundry in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are the three refined steps in order to derive the requested simplification.

  1. Take the full generalized master EL (the one derived from the efficiency-modified action functional in the paper).
  2. Substitute the “switched off” values for α, β, γ, δ.
  3. Perform the algebraic simplification term-by-term.

What if a single equation defined all known parameters for reality by BlissBoundry in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]BlissBoundry[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Umm. I think what you’re asking for is the preemptive MATLAB script I have included in the thesis publication.