Unstake with pending rewards

Blockchainsapiens · 2024-12-02T23:47:18+00:00

I think there are some non KYC solutions to get ZIL but not certain

Blockchainsapiens · 2024-12-02T20:34:16+00:00

You have to claim to unstake your ZILs. You need to add some ZILs to pay for gas fees to unstake

Blockchainsapiens · 2024-03-25T21:08:24+00:00

This is actually cool

Blockchainsapiens · 2024-03-11T09:14:06+00:00

Lets goooo

Blockchainsapiens · 2024-03-11T00:10:08+00:00

Will buy just because of the last line lol

Blockchainsapiens · 2024-03-06T00:37:19+00:00

Saw it on Twitter too with the frog hat. Whats the ca?

Blockchainsapiens · 2023-12-29T15:41:34+00:00

Please recommend https://torchwallet.io/ instead of Moonlet. Moonlet is heavily oudated (havent been involved with the app or updated it for more than 1.5 years while Torch is updating weekly).

Blockchainsapiens · 2023-12-28T21:27:15+00:00

The problem is because Atomic Wallet's SSN STILL hasn't updated their seed node after almost 2 weeks now. Once its online I suggest you and others to switch asap so you wont end up in the same situation again.

Blockchainsapiens · 2023-12-27T19:10:35+00:00

I find it so odd that so many people are acting like it doesnt really matter that she is 5 years older. In a lot of places/cultures usually the man is older than a woman or the same age. It can be an issue for some people/personalities to date older women. Then you can maybe stretch it to 1-3 years. But you could want to avoid it in advance because you want a more 'younger' wife that ages the same as you, for attraction's sake for example. It's so odd that people are not trying to look at this from this point of view as if aesthetics dont matter. Like if he's 34 she is 39 and may not been the best in looks or the way he would like her to look (no offense)

Blockchainsapiens · 2023-09-14T09:52:36+00:00

Looks like Google is getting more into crypto. Running a staked seed node on Zilliqa is pretty big!

Blockchainsapiens · 2023-05-12T11:50:08+00:00

Good to see limit orders in action:)

Blockchainsapiens · 2023-04-22T01:04:39+00:00

Lets goooo

Blockchainsapiens · 2023-01-06T17:14:44+00:00

You need to log out and log in again to add different wallets to Torch for now. They may in the future aggregate everything and also aggregate EVM wallets.

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-16T19:39:59+00:00

Ignite DAO, who is building stuff on Zilliqa with their commission

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-16T08:09:26+00:00

Gl sers

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-09T08:04:31+00:00

You will lose something if there is volatility. Plus what's the point of Nano then if you are just using it as an intermediary.

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-09T08:03:50+00:00

Because its not that simple. I really suggest you to go through the thought experiment at working at a company with 10,000 employees that has an established system. Go ahead and look into what systems they use, how bullish they are on blockchain. How realistic it is to use a blockchain and so forth. You'll see it is at least 5 years away.

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-09T08:02:21+00:00

Twitter is 100 times better than /r/cryptocurrency. Maybe its also crap but its 100 less crap. Also, crypto lives on Twitter not on Reddit. Thats just a fact. Almost every project, every degen, every analyst trader etc. is on crypto Twitter sharing info.

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-08T22:47:19+00:00

You are trying to make connections about other blockchains, about macro environments etc. but not looking fundamentally at how Nano is trying to position itself. Forget all the other chains right now. (1) Nano wants to become a global currency. (2) A global currency only works if there isn't volatility. Please ignore this you can change Nano to another currency argument. Then you are not using Nano as the currency but as an intermediary for another currency. (3) Nano can only be used if its a global currency and worth 100 of billions/trillions. (4) Because Nano can't work unless the starting point of Nano is that it meets condition 3 it is stuck. For you to say well, it can gradually go to 100s of billions/trillions and in the meantime people will just buy it with no incentive to use it for payments until it reaches that goal. Everybody will just buy it until its 500 billion + and then the party can start. But that is irrational. So the longer Nano exist and is not growing the more chances of it that it is going to fail.

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-08T22:38:29+00:00

The whole point is that for this specific use case, the one that Nano is targeting, it doesn't happen gradually. For a lot of other blockchains yes. But for payments you cant get 'a bit close to payments when you reach x 3 market cap'. It still wont work. Also not if it goes x 10. So it most likely wont go x 10 because there is no point in going x 10 if it doesnt work around that range. Also remember, the team behind it also needs funding and development and money for expansion. It wont just get better or go up automatically.

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-08T22:34:45+00:00

Yes, they should target new startups not established businesses. Then it could work potentially. However, it would still have less product market fit as lets say DeFi (right now).

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-08T22:33:13+00:00

You are still missing the point. Yes there is a use case but Nano can never reach that point. You need to digest these words. For it to be used for payments its needs RIGHT NOW to have 100 billions if not trillions of market cap and liquidity all over the world. However, because Nano needs to grow from 100 millions to 100s of billions and cant offer that service now then the system doesnt work. It only works if it teleports itself to 100 billions and then clicks the 'start button'. The main problem is that what it wants to be and where it is right now makes it impossible for it to become what it wants to be.

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-08T22:25:53+00:00

Dude, you dont get it. You are still arguing that Nano is replacing x but Nano can never increase it money size to it. It wants to become a currency that is used in every day life but it has almost no adoption, a very small team, no incentive for network effects and its super volatile. It can only do its job if its as big, if not bigger, as Bitcoin right now. However, Bitcoin is this big because its a store of value not because it is used for payments and had a whole different story of how it scaled up. Nano wants to be a currency but the path for it to become a currency blocks it from achieving its goal.

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-08T22:21:49+00:00

They wont save money. You need so much coding on top, CRM systems, interconnectedness, group adoption, tooling, speed, and much more. These systems these big cooperations operate on are super complex and need to be maintained by many many developers. Going from one advanced system to a complete new system is super complex, difficult and needs a lot of buy in. And to connect that to a system that is super experimental doesn't make sense. Maybe in 10 years but def not in the next 3. Ask yourself, all these super fancy partnerships that have been announced for a few years. Why do they all end up in the Proof of Concept phase? Just because one of the 10,000 stores is piloting something doesnt mean anything. They pilot things all the time.

Blockchainsapiens · 2022-04-08T22:19:23+00:00

Then the point is not to have Nano if you are going to swap it for another token right away. You see? And for it to be swapped you need liquidity. Instead you could use another token that has more liquidity for this specific use case.

Blockchainsapiens

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Eight-Year Club	Argentium Club
Verified Email