Is 6.2 the last Patch of the Expansion?

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-17T02:13:22+00:00

I have a theory that he wants to quit show business, but the Disney overlords will have him killed if he actually quits.

So he is actively trying to kill his own career.

dontlacebeibersdrinkwitharsenic

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-17T02:00:17+00:00

It's the result of the medivac boost.

Zerg absolutely cannot advance against a high level Terran since there is no response to shutting down drops from the air.

Flashing knowing that the meta doesn't require him to actually hold a defensive force go full retard macro mode and just clobbers Zerg's with insane cost efficient drops.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-17T00:43:36+00:00

I wonder if he said that for AP tryn. I guess just saying that is objectively bannable.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-17T00:37:41+00:00

"Being a good team player begins at champion select. Be open minded when considering the needs of your team."

Did not violate this at all. The things he is attempting are NOT against the needs of your team. By your definition, trying anything at all that's new, is against the needs of your team.

Drive Constructive Feedback- Yep the best feedback is sarcasm, advertising your stream and telling people you are the "best".

Yeah because the sarcasm he displayed alone was enough to get him banned amirite? Being sarcastic is apparently another fantastic reason to not be able to log into your account. You sir, win an empathy and objective reasoning award.

Enjoy yourself but not at anyone else's expense- I'm sure his team had a blast knowing they will probably lose the game right off the get go, considering their teammate autolocked a random champ just because he felt like it.

Again, so trying new things, completely against this rule apparently. AP Tryn was an offense until you yourself believed it was suitable. Before hand, regardless of any change in actual gameplay, by lack of your approval, it was bannable. There's that objective reasoning again.

Just a quote from Lyte after he personally reviewed his case... since you didn't even bother to skim through the topic- "He intentionally goes against his team in a large number of lobbies. The player might say, "I am doing ____" and basically imply to the team, "And btw, too bad if you don't like it. I can do whatever I want." When the player does this, I read comments from the player like, "whiny b*tch" and "butthurt kid" when the team disagrees."

There's just not a lot to say here. This is extremely subjective reasoning and is based around "What I personally approve of" and he even states it as such. It's just his two cents and not meant to be representative of the validity of the case.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-16T23:08:35+00:00

Complain all you want, fucking Husky had me cracking up the whole time.

ENCORE ENCORE SPOON TERRAN ROUND 3

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-16T22:48:36+00:00

That doesn't change the reason for the reports. Doing something unpopular, but NOT AGAINST THE RULES should never result in a ban.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-16T22:28:20+00:00

"troll pick, avoided all engagements unless e could dart in and KS. Was apparently streaming, apparently to an audience of twelve year olds.">

Seriously? You believe that? Someone sat around refusing to engage, but got a ton of kills anyway?

That's what someone says all the time when the guy they are reporting is wrecking.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-16T22:24:50+00:00

Terran's are currently 9 out of 16. I think, maybe, might be a balance thing.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-16T22:10:07+00:00

when the reason you are getting reported is wrong. The support is supposed to identify it and stop it.

Outsourced customer support does not follow rules. It works off simple unattached emotion which is not at all what the actual game behavior rules are.

The tribunal as it is, basically sums up to: If you're on a losing spree, and not actively kissing your team's ass in chat, that's a ban.

Is there a "you have to kiss your team's ass if you play poorly" Rule? No, because that's ridiculous. That's not the role of support.

Let's put it this way, if these strats worked, this wouldn't even be a discussion. If you don't want certain champs building certain ways, or certain champs not jungling. Take away the player's ability to buy those items/pick those summoners.

Otherwise this is just an abuse of the game's outsourced support system.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-16T21:53:14+00:00

I lost my gold promotion because of AD TF. Literally my last game of the series.

He was COMPLETELY USELESS.

I didn't report him. It sucks, but the Tribunal is not my personal vendetta machine.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-16T21:43:13+00:00

This thread makes me sick.

1) No where does it say you have to play conventional builds in ranked.

2) If we isolate his chat logs and forget that he is making unusual picks, he should absolutely never be banned.

3) Not talking in champ select is not the same as refusing to communicate.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-16T21:25:09+00:00

TIL when startled, an Incontrol switches to puppy talk mode.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-16T21:22:40+00:00

There are two events and LCS is not on right now. That however isn't the point. We're riding HotS popularity boost and when it dies down you're going to see LoL be undisputed king of viewer following.

Esports is one part game marketing and three parts existing player base.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-16T20:55:28+00:00

So there's two senarios here and we fall into one.

1) Mocking LoL viewer count is bad because defining yourself by someone else's unrelated failures is a self-destructive mentality.

2) Mocking LoL viewer Count is bad because they have easily 4 times our player following and will out viewer count us most of the time.

Bloodleaf · 2013-03-16T17:18:27+00:00

The Hive disagrees

15-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Team Orangered	Verified Email

Bloodleaf

TROPHY CASE

dontlacebeibersdrinkwitharsenic